DiabloFans

He cheated because he doesn't like the game. He feels forced to playing it. He streamed the cheat because he's an attention seeking person. He was banned, while others were rolled back, because he streamed it and encourage others to do the same cheat(this is Blizzards biggest no no).

I only have one question regarding this whole thing. Why isn't he banned from Twitch.tv?

Cheating is never acceptable in life. Maybe when you all grow older and maturer you'll learn that cheating is bad and those who cheat should be punished appropriately.

Quote from BaronVonBeef

Quote from OnTwoFronts

Do people STILL think this is an MMO and it's going to get new content on the scale that WoW does, or even close to it? Not happening. We'll get an expansion and we'll get small things to do added every now and then. Pretty much everyone that played D2 knew this going into the game.

As soon as Blizz decided to give D3 online only DRM they forced themselves to carry on supporting the game, if they allowed offline games & modding this wouldn't be a problem.

Until then it might be best to keep your mouth shut, defending Blizzard at this point is pathetic to say the least.

Pathetic? How about realistic. This isn't an MMORPG where you get constant updates to the game every month. Hell, even the top MMORPG's don't get updates once a month. Being online only has nothing to do with their obligation to constantly update. They made it clear that they will update the game regardless of the online thing. Look at Diablo, Diablo2, warcraft2, warcraft3, and starcraft. All of those got updates after release even though they didn't have to.

The chart isn't going to stay the same. Period. The current paragon systems exponential curve is too steep after level 200. It's too exponentially out of wack to support more than 100 levels. It will be redesigned. Just let it go!

Do people STILL think this is an MMO and it's going to get new content on the scale that WoW does, or even close to it? Not happening. We'll get an expansion and we'll get small things to do added every now and then. Pretty much everyone that played D2 knew this going into the game.

Quote from wedgeski

Quote from Ryude

Content? That shit costs money to develop.

And you think all the support that's gone into the game since release doesn't?

@Rhye, totally agree. I'll say 'til I'm blue in the face: for new dungeons, new monsters, new quests, and new storylines, I'd gladly pay at least a WoW subscription to D3.

Compared to developing new assets, it's not even close. They'd need at least 10x the manpower they have working on d3 at this time. I wager they only have 3 programmers, 1 artist, and bunch of designers (the guys that call the shots). It's no wonder updates take forever.

Quote from Rhye

I find it hilarious that they celebrate the games first year live, and at the same time talk about security issues and AH exploits. That's something they should have been done with 1 month into the game. Also, I really thought we'd have some kind of random dungeon generator or custom maps by now. Maybe some kind of survival mode or a few more uberbosses.

Nono, it's all about "finding players near you" and "now you can have a message next to your name to broadcast to all your friends". Stop making this game into facebook and give us some content

Content? That shit costs money to develop.

No fix to the retardedly fast Elite Tremors? With their insane speed (after first shielding), you can NOT run away. It's pretty much GG for glass cannons.

That is one of the worst, most biased, ignorant, misleading and dis-informative article I've read in a long, long time. I regret reading that.

I'll hate on Diablo all day for things that went wrong / are going wrong... but this guy clearly sat down and thought "Okay, time for that article I was gonna write to smear Diablo 3 to the ground because I hate it...".

You can't say build diversity is superior when you know damn well that in every game people figure out SOMETHING eventually that is the 'best', it gets popular, and developers balance it out. Not that I'm saying Diablo 3 is awsome at this (I actually think there's been much failure in 1.0.4 'balancing'), but the dude's makin' TL2 sound like a magical fantasmical land where you can pick whatever is prettiest to your eyes and do just as good with it as another guy who has done his math and decided on something else.

He also praises TL2 for having no RMAH, proclaiming that that means people can't buy gear on TL2. This made me laugh. You can buy yourself to the top in any game. You can buy yourself to the top in almost anyTHING. Hell, if I was Blizzard I woulda done the same. They said to themselves "in-game goods sold for real money is gonna happen weather we like it or not... so we're just going to do it ourselves. We made the game... we're gonna cash in on this instead of playing police".

Guy proceeds to include the silliest things as well. Lots of loot vs. insane amounts of loot... that was rich. Also pets! Maybe someone should make a counter-argument, claiming that Diablo 3 has angel wings and armor dye while TL2 doesn't, therefore Diablo 3 is better. lol.

That article is so, excuse my language, retardedly biased towards TL2 that it is not worth a read. Really, like blizzard did every single thing wrong with their game? Even if you don't agree with the way some things are done in D3 naming every single thing less than TL2 is just plain stupid. It is a different game of the same genre.