DiabloFans

Why do people write something that isn't a question and just put a question mark at the end of it?

I think I agree with Gausti's 7/10. I would put the sword and stone in a different background. Imo.


I don't know why I like these kinds of threads so much. They are addicting!!!

Quote from "Turmobil" »

That's weird...
I only see girls in the picture.

Lol, you got me.







Here is a better one. Thats Sarah on the left. (my very awesome neighbor)

I am the guy. :thumbsup:

Hope the alcohol in the background isn't against any rules.

Quote from "Umpa65" »

That's ethics. He made the wrong decision about how to get the money. But in any case, those are human ethics. Those would not apply to a god. Ethics do not apply to a god if omnipotent because it is the one that makes the rules.

Evil is most likely (if it exists) merely the absence of a divine good.

Oh and the whole Mary thing is not far-fetched if you put it into perspective. Which should be relatively easy. Religious people believe in a higher being that can do anything (insert countless impossible tasks of the bible) so Mary being a virgin is merely the will of God. It's not that hard to understand really.


But we should really get back on topic now. This is not the place for this.

Did you just say if evil exists? lol

And I understand how Mary could have birthed Jesus according to religion but I just think it's incredibly ridiculous to believe in something so random and unproven by anyone. (It just makes you add more "faith")

The religion was not formed until after Jesus died so how could anyone know about his birth? They can't....

And "God" according to the bible has ethics. And if he made the rules, then what are they? Because I can do whatever I want, whenever I feel like it.

Quote from "Carloseus" »

Gandalf from the Lord of the Rings(best movie ever)
"You Cannot Pass!"

"You shall not pass." lol

and

From Boondock saints

"Brilliant. So now we got a huge guy theory, and a serial crusher theory. Top notch police work."

Quote from "Ivaron" »

Go sit in the corner.

Good constructive argument......:facepalm:

Every class can dominate a pub duel game.......If you know what you are doing.



I am no more....

D2 is pretty damn balanced for PvP. PvE is another story.

Just runewords destroyed everything.

The classes will be balanced. Remember, this is Blizzard.

This Forum is officially over run with spam. My idea to try and cut it down a little was immediately locked by a mod. Its like Seth is a police escort for spammers.....

Oh well.... this site was fun before it was flooded with flooders and moderated by teens.


Just ask yourself one question.

Why is spam rewarded and not controlled?

Buh bye meow.



P.S. Please delete this post if you have any self dignity.

Quote from name="Elfen Lied" »

there used to be lots, then we got the spam section, that reduced the amount of spam in threads dramatically.

Where is the spam section now????

Oh yeah..... Everywhere!!!

Quote from "Maestro" »

It is still a reward system that encourages spamming. I liked Phrozen's Idea for the time delay before you can do certain things.

Not so much with a sig or an avatar but a time delay before you can give reputation or whatever. By the time they can send rep they would be bored of it and give up.

Woah. Crazy Idea!!! LOCK THE THREAD IMMEDIATELY!!!!

Quote from "Zhar" »

With the seniority case, you can simply join early, and have a badass title for doing nothing.

You think having a much greater interest much earlier means nothing?

I find that a little naive.

Joining this site before the game was even announced should be rewarded in some way. It just shows a much greater interest in the game.

Quote from "Siaynoq" »

Blades, there are a lot of post count whores on the site. And ever since they were allowed to spam and get posts for it they've really been at it. I fought hard against it, but management felt it was the best decision and I won't go further into than that.

But then again, I've not seen you around much at all lately either and yeah, awarding people rank based on seniority isn't really the best idea. Even if the spammers are spammers, they're still more active and involved now than you, right? The good news is, titles don't mean anything anyway. The ones who build up their post counts primarily by spamming the site know who they are and know deep down that their titles are especially meaningless.

I understand your point, but I have been here, you just don't know it. I just have nothing to post about because there is no point. We now know they are making the game all I have to do is wait. I have posted occasionally to answer questions or to ask questions, not to speculate about an unknown character that will be released soon enough anyway.

People bashing on me saying that I just want my own rank up is quite offensive.

I don't want my rank to even go up, I just have seen an incredible amount of spam throughout the site and it is really pathetic.

This thread has already gone off topic.

Something needs to be done about the amount of spam even if this isn't the perfect solution.

Their may be other ways to reduce spam but I think this would be the most effective.

I honestly believe that these titles do mean something to the immature people who are continuously spamming.

Maybe just the combination of post count and join date could determine someones title.

I enjoy the feedback, but please keep it on topic.

I believe that having the title based on post count actually encourages :spam:.



I think if the title was determined on join date it would make much more sense. Why not reward the senior members for their dedication?


Maybe if there is enough support a poll is in order?

I've beaten the game with a zealer, frenzy barb, and wind druid. Druid was recent and by far the easiest because of cyclone armor.

Jager BOMBS!!!!!!!!!!



Ooooohhh, accidental resurrection!

High Def WW Barb, can roll through a pally, zon, sorc, and druid all at the same time. (scrubs of course) Haha