• 0

    posted a message on For something so important to damage calculations, additive vs multiplicative buffs seem to be very poorly documented

    I'm making a spreadsheet to figure out which is the highest damage build for my DH, and this link is the only decent source I can find for this information, and that's touching only on wizard specific skills. Is there anyone who has a comprehensive (and TESTED! Not just what you remember) list including more class buffs and new items?


    So far the only things I've managed to glean on the internet is that Marked for Death is a category A additive buff, and that Cull the Weak and Ambush are individual categories (multiplicative).


    On the chance that someone doesn't have this laying around I'll ask about the biggest question marks for me:


    Focus/Restraint: Category A (additive), special category (multiplicative with everything else, but additive with each other) or individual categories (multiplicative with each other and everything else)?

    Unhallowed Essence 4pc: Category A, other or individual?

    Unhallowed Essence 6pc: Category A, other or individual?

    Marauder 6pc: Category A, other or individual?

    Natalya 4pc: Category A, other or individual?

    Natalya 6pc: Category A, other or individual?

    Convention of Elements: Regular elemental damage (Category B, additive with regular elemental damage) or individual?

    Posted in: Demon Hunter: The Dreadlands
  • 0

    posted a message on Interview with Alkaizer
    Quote from Defrag

    he can't write that (obv) but it's common knowledge that the account was leveled up by 3 people. Putting in 5-6h a day each doesn't sound as retarded as being wasting life playing 19h/day.

    Based on what?

    Obviously it's common knowledge that the blizzard development team is actually a team of crack commandos that were imprisoned for a crime they didn't commit. Just because you say "it's common knowledge" doesn't free you from the obligation to provide sources for such moronic statements. But you get bonus points for calling him "retarded" and accusing him of "wasting life" for doing something he enjoys.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on Little disappointed in diablo fans
    Quote from Trombone

    Quote from Joan_S

    But can you tell me who actually killed JFK?

    No but I could back my claim up if you wanna look like a bigger moron?

    Sure, because that "theory" is one of the dumbest things I've heard in a long time, and the same thing has been said again and again by someone displeased with the cheating situation in every game ever made. The truth is that detecting bots is HARD - every false positive will be a legitimate gamer you piss off, and just because someone won't talk to you while they are farming the same spot for hours on end doesn't mean they are bots, you need to programatically detect what is going on on the other end, and even when you DO manage to detect a specific attack vector, you always delay bans by a significant period of time from detection so that there's always a huge uncertainty about what exactly was detected and when. There is also significant effort to ban the accounts that "collect" from bots instead of the bots themselves - when a bot is detected, it's far more effective to watch someone bot up a million gold and then ban the account with all those ill-gotten gains in it instead of just playing whack-a-mole with bot accounts.

    If you think it's good business sense to let legitimate players suffer on the behalf of botters then I hope you'll never run a triple-A MMO studio.
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on Little disappointed in diablo fans
    Quote from Trombone

    Lol, that would be a nice way to piss of their userbase at least.
    Don't forget, Blizzard actually loves botters and cheaters. They make tons of money from all the cd keys they have to buy. They want us to think that they are terrible, and in some sense they are, but the bottom line is that Blizzard makes millions of dollars from them.
    Their warden software is deliberately ineffective anti-cheating system and is only in place to gather a ton of personal information, with the goal of making more money by understanding their users better.

    But can you tell me who actually killed JFK?
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on Simple Spell Tooltips Live, Blue on Patch 10,Beta Level Cap, Vote for D3, Weekly Roundup
    Quote from UberMey

    So the loot will be for each player, and I really appreciate it since I lost so many items long ago for Pickit players lol...

    But I have a question and not sure if this question was already answered, how will work the MF stuff? will it work for each player individual or some kind of math between all the players in party?

    Thanks

    Since each player sees individual loot drops it's fairly obvious to assume that each player's MF applies individually to that player's drops.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on Will my PC be ok for D3?
    Quote from WishedHeHadBeta


    Official Blizzard Quote:




    RECOMMENDED SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS: PC

    OS: Windows Vista®/Windows® 7 (Latest Service Packs) | Processor: Intel® Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or AMD AthlonTM 64 X2 5600+ 2.8 GHz | Memory: 2 GB RAM | Video: NVIDIA® GeForce® 260 or ATI Radeon™ HD 4870 or better


    what blizz means by "recommended" they actually mean playable. if you have the "minimum" system requirements you wont be able to play even on absolute lowest settings without major lag. you can very easily buy a desktop PC for less then $600 that is double the recommended settings for D3 if you build it yourself from newegg.com.

    No, these "recommended" specs almost exactly describe my PC and I run 1920x1200 with everything on high/ultra with perfect frame rate. Recommended means the game will run fine.
    Posted in: Technical Support
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.