WoW whining, if anyhwere, goes here:
http://www.diablo3.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22
Personally, I honestly think WoW may be the best game I've ever played. Not because of graphics, or gameplay, or story, or items, or anything else, but because of the total sum that you get out of all of it.
And because I haven't played it for 6 months but still find myself wanting to play it.
Will D3 be D2 with better graphics? maybe, but nothing is certain. Considering the big leap in time we have here, plus many leaving Blizzard, the chances of taht happening are slim.
- PhrozenDragon
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 6 months, and 3 days
Last active Sat, Jan, 18 2014 22:23:24
- 51 Followers
- 12,879 Total Posts
- 215 Thanks
-
Jan 2, 2007PhrozenDragon posted a message on Happy New Year Diablo Fans!It just has to come, I can't take this anymore if it doesn't. All evidence to the contrary though, thankfully.Posted in: News
-
Dec 28, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!From what I heard fourth quarter 2007 - first quarter 2008. So still a long time. But I really want to play it. So far the only problem I see is that all monsters look too cute no matter what you do.Posted in: News
However, I will still try to make a Diablo-race -
Dec 27, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Yes, but I see a trend in games, one I think is very good. Games are more and more focusing on player interaction, and PvP is one step.Posted in: News
The only notable exception I can think of is Spore, which is not going to have any multiplayer. -
Dec 27, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Posted in: News1) An intense story. maybe even a 2 tier game one from the role as a good hero the other from the evil side.
Already been suggested, and most people want to see it.
2) Obviously I'd prefer a M rated game. Allthough with todays games Im not to sure if violence and gore will get a M rating. Since its based in a fantasy world I don't see diologe with F bombs a flying.
Also what many people want, but I would not want that much blood. In my opinion that isn;t necessary to make a great game.
3) The Hack and slash of the old Diablo's was fun but as a more Mature gamer now I'd like to see a more involved RPG along the Lines of The Elder Scroll's series but still keep the Diablo feel in the enviroments, Monsters and items and everything the game is known for.
For this you will be shot, tortured, decapitated and your remains thrown to the dogs. Hack&Slash is what Diablo is famous for. And besides, there are no other hack&slash games out there anymore, so theoretically Diablo has that whole market.
But, if Blizzard manages to make a good Diablo without hack&slash, I will still play it. I just don't think that will happen.
4) A large and expansive game world.
Yes, we all want that.
5) I'd also love to see modabilty with built in user friendly tools. Like a diablo COnstrution set. (this though isnt a big requirment for me just would be cool to play Mods from all the twisted imaginations of the diablo fans)
Which is possible right now if you but just head over to http://phrozenkeep.it-point.com and check out the mods.
6) as far as multiplayer I rarely played Diablo online. I was into EQ so I am a big MMOer, but given that I enjoyed my few hours of diablo Multiplayer/ So coop and straight pvp in the game world would be a blast.
Personally i think most games are heading towards more multiplayer interaction in the gaming world, so this will most likely happen.
7) Evil, it has to be evil. I want it to be so evil and haunting that it'll send chills down my spine.
Possible, but I don't know. There's been some discussion here about it.
8) Amazing music and total emersion with sound effects and Graphics. (course, I'd not want a system hog but maybe U can't have both. So, I may wanna plan for my next upgrade of my upgrade that I am doing soon hehe)
So long as it doesn't take steam off the content, it will most likely come also. -
Dec 26, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!16 I think, but it doesn't matterPosted in: News
Anyway yes, when that is released we can start to expect something else coming from Blizzard (information-wise). -
Dec 26, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 Petition8.000 people? yeah, it looks great, but it's less than 1/10 of 1 percent of what Blizzard will expect of a fanbase for D3. So yeah, it probably won't work (never say never) but it's funPosted in: News
-
Dec 21, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!I'm not saying it won't come out, just that IGN is as clueless as the rest of us.Posted in: News
-
Dec 21, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!No, it was done by the designer of that banner without any connection to actual information from IGN.Posted in: News
And seriously, what would stop any repoter from relaying legit D3 info? -
Nov 21, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionHmm that's rough. Didn't expect that.Posted in: News
-
Nov 21, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionReally though, what is the motive behind that> If a post is well-presented and thourough, there shouldn;t be a problem, right?Posted in: News
-
Nov 20, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionThen we need something. Do some nice screenshots in Photoshop, make a custom video, spa...uh I mean, persuade other people on other forums.Posted in: News
-
Nov 20, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on "Official" Diablo 3 PetitionIt's nice to talk of goals when we're not actually doing anything to promote it. Or are we (other than just being here I mean)?Posted in: News
-
Nov 3, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on The Final Diablo 3 is Coming argumentUnfair is not a valid argument. Blizzard doesn't care if diablo fans get to wait longer for a game, it's not about that. It is about developing their franchises in the right direction.Posted in: News
-
Nov 1, 2006PhrozenDragon posted a message on Biggest Diablo 3 Information Yet!Though an MMO expansion? No way, an MMO is constructed in an entirely different way, not the least of which is the whole multiplayer aspect.Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
It is SQL based (I think), but all pages are jumbled together.
0
0
I understand that you want your theory to be true, but I don't give it much hope. The most telling problem is that Tyrael was with Cain during the whole of Act IV, and on top of that Tyrael has sworn an oath to protect the Horadrim. He would know if Belial was directly controlling Cain.
But could Cain be a servant without being controlled? Maybe, but there's no trace throughout the games that Cain would be a servant of Belial. You could argue that Cain is so good at covering his tracks that nobody suspects, but then you've created a theory that can't be disproved, a classic conspiracy.
0
I'll complement what Daemaro wrote. I agree with the siding with demons part, unless Imperious goes as crazy as Inarius does in the end of the books, he's never siding with Hell.
Could the meteor be Imperius? I don't know. Any theory involving that meteor has to be based on so many assumptions at this point that it becomes impossible to say anything definitive.
Extremely unlikely. It's very far-fetched, it requires Belial to leave the current civil war with Azmodan, it also requires him to remain in Cain for 20 years without doing much. That's a lot of time wasted that could be better spent elsewhere, especially since it likely means losing all of Hell to Azmodan. Plus it might conflict with Worldstone mechanics, but that's speculation based on speculation...
Why was Cain imprisoned? It could have been as punishment, instead of dying quickly you'd have to watch everyone you know become undead as you starve to death. This is also the area where game mechanics start directly affecting the lore. Cain had to survive for the story's sake, which has to be taken into account when considering why he lived.
Yeah that's a good point, it could very well work that way in theory.
Never!
0
0
0
If my theory is correct, or if D2 lore is true, then Tyrael shatters the stone to prevent a situation where only Hell can invade Sanctuary while Heaven can't do anything about it.
0
Adding D1 guides probably wasn't that important, but what about mod builds? One could select a mod just as one selects a game. They would of course require a unique keyword list, but otherwise it could well be incorporated yes?
0
The one problem that I see arising from this is that if the Three knew of the Worldstone, why didn't they run straight to it when they were first banished? But it might well have been that they did but were continually stopped by the Horadrim and other orders. And there's still the issue of Talic, Korlic and Madawc. Whether the Three knew of them specifically, they knew Arreat was guarded, and Baal appears very determined to avoid contact with them during LoD. Perhaps they needed to build up strength after being banished, or perhaps they needed an army to decimate any form of resistance.
0
I don't know, but welcome nonetheless
0
I would have to disagree. The fact that humans are the descendants of Heaven and Hell fits well into the universe. It explains why Sanctuary is special and why humans are of particular interest. There are hints of other worlds in the books, but this cosmological design seems to define the central point: humanity is at the heart of this conflict.
As for what critters are, that's a good point. I'd advise you to read the first cosmology. I argue that Sanctuary did exist before Inarius came, there just weren't no humans. It's not entirely accurate, as I've found some contradicting points, but I still think it's largely accurate.
Right... 1984 was such a blast, I'm sure humanity would enjoy strict angelic rule. And like Trag'Oul says in the books, humanity would probably choose order if they were presented with a choice. But the end result would not be much better.
Demons do not need a host to enter Sanctuary. There is not a single point in the books where a demon or angel ever take a host other than purely for subterfuge (and that's only Lilith). And you can cry foul at crappy book lore here, but even if we disregard the books there's little evidence to support that the Three needed hosts to remain on Sanctuary.
They needed hosts because they were trapped inside of stones, and moving or doing just about anything is quite hard when you're inside of a stone.
0
Blizzard knows what Knaak wrote and checked it. It's certainly not independent.
0
0
1
It's not entirely impossible that the Worldstone, or whatever provides the actual protection, is not capable of fully blocking out beings as powerful as Tyrael. But even so, it could be that the shield actively wears him down, or that his weakened state after fighting Baal and Diablo makes him more susceptible to it. The soulstones would of course protect the Three from this.
Thank you, but let us hope not! I'm counting on someone at BlizzHQ having a much more consistent explanation for these troublesome discrepancies