Quote from Simca
Quote from Diktat
Quote from Simca
Quote from Diktat
Completely doctored stats. They take ALL chars into account for their stats. Given that probably 50-60% of all characters are mules, or under level 5, it's complete BS.
I'd estimate about 30-40% of all players are in Inferno. Probably more.
LOL. You have no perspective about any kind of gamer other than yourself (hardcore/skilled gamer) if you honestly believe what you just said.
Most of the people clear Normal and never continue. The other people probably couldn't make it through Nightmare.
You have to understand that most people are not you. We are the 1% (well probably more like top 5%) of gamers, and it wasn't hard to get here. It just happens because there are so many other gamers gaming for so many different reasons.
Blizzard may or may not be inflating their statistics but the real % in Inferno is not even half of what you suggested. Not even close.
Sure, if blinding yourself and feeling "elite" makes you all warm and fuzzy. Why don't they show the percentages of ACCOUNTS that have unlocked Inferno then?
No, the stats shown are chosen very carefully, in order to push a point.
You just don't have any perspective on the gaming population if you honestly believe anywhere near 40% of accounts have unlocked Inferno. That's just absurd.
Have you at least thought for a second that people in hell act 4 just don't want to go inferno seeing how hopeless it is? A little more than 1% that made it to inferno is nothing for blizzard to boast about. They think it means, 'oh you didnt make to inferno, then you have no reason to complain', wait what? DAFUQ? Need a slap, blizzard? There are so many messed up things in Daiblo 3 right now, that it's not just inferno. Almost everything is f*cked, except for graphics and pretty WoW spells. Even at that graphics are kiddie.
0
I wasn't even active on here during the beta and how would you know being registered today? Nerve? Blizzard is the one that had the nerve to release a beta game, you prick. What nerve?
0
Nothing is keeping you here
0
Like other posters on here stated, Diablo is a franchise that is meant to be replayed. What is the point of AH and RMAH then and the different builds and randomized events? Why would someone be expected to spend real life money for a one-time run through game? Seriously, do you think the whole content is worth the $60? Let's be reasonable here. The game does not have the replay value like it's predecessor, imo, no scratch that, it's a fact.
0
0
I'm a milsim freak. I don't think a COD kiddie would last long in Arma 2 or Project Reality.
Btw, to the people that are bored with D3 and want to try something new for less try the ultimate Zombie Survival mod with an open persistent world, 'DayZ'. That thing is addictive as hell.
0
Yes, I hope your head explodes.
0
But is Diablo 3 a singleplayer game? I don't think so.
0
Wrong, this game is made to be replayable and not for a one time run like Mario. Games are different today, especially Blizzards. Besides, it is their policy, they accept return within 30 days. Wtf did I pirate? They should thank me that actually had some hope with it, that I gave it so much time to try and enjoy it. And I'm even overlooking the fail launch day and the never ending maintenance, lag and bugs. It's almost as though I paid for a beta.
And the point of me sharing it is so that other Diablo fans that are completely disappointed with the game can still have some hope of not letting their money go to waste,
0
More interested in FPS games now and no, not COD.
1
Why do you people keep using that argument. Just because that happened to Diablo 2 twelve years ago doesn't justify Diablo 3's bad release? It's so annoying to hear that. Diablo 2 was in development for 3-4 years and it actually defeated Diablo 1 in gameplay, story, mechanics, content, replayabilty, everything even if it kinda sucked. Diablo 3 team inherited some work from the Blizzard North team that was working on it 6-7 years ago. So the current Diablo 3 team had all those 6-7 years to develop it, they had experience. And I did play Diablo 2 from the start, even the demo and I loved it, I did not get bored for some reason.
Problem is that Diablo 3 is fundamentally flawed with things like linearity and game mechanics. I just don't see any real changes coming, apart from nerfs and some changes to itemization issue, which blizzard is still in denial of. So your argument, 'just because D2 sucked in the beginning, D3 has the same right to suck'. Your argument is invalid. All the new team did was simplify Diablo 3 into a more mainstream game. The game no longer feels like a Diablo game, yet it still has the title. It didn't improve from it's predecessor except for the graphics(Still WoW-ie) and to some extent gameplay(I give that a pass). But overall, it was dumbed down.
0
It was a hopeful grind, I was trying my best to be optimistic that it will get better and enjoy the game. Unfortunately that never happened. Besides, like I wrote, I lost items on the AH due to the idiotic bugs, too laggy etc. But that was just technical things, I'm sure you'll understand why I REALLY don't like it. Anyways, I thank Diablo 2/LOD for good teenage memories, it was a simpler time.
2
Btw, I had 65 hours clocked in on my barb, inferno and it was no problem. Just be really nice to them, that's all. I made my purchase on May 12th, so you still can get a refund guys.
Those that are still enjoying the game, more power to you! And now back to DayZ
0
No... but if he'll serve me shit food I'll tell him the food sucks and I want a refund.
0
0