• 1

    posted a message on Closed Beta Players - "One of the Chosen" Feat of Strength
    To everyone following the game, it was well within their own individual power to obtain the class sigils. If they missed out on them, nobody is at fault but themselves.

    However, to everyone following the game, beta invites were outside of their personal power to influence. To the fans of the game, you fell into 2 categories. Those with beta invites and those without. You could help tilt the scales in your favor ever so slightly by participating in fansite contests and events, but ultimately the beta handouts were completely random and out of the fan's hands.

    That's the difference between the 2. In one category, fans had direct control over whether they get their reward or not. In the other category, fans had very little to no control whatsoever.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 1

    posted a message on Closed Beta Players - "One of the Chosen" Feat of Strength
    Okay, I'll chime in here.

    I was accepted into the closed beta, so I'm getting the feat of strength and the sigil. That being said, I'm very surprised by this move by Blizzard.

    When I got my beta invite late 2011, I was so stoked. I was fortunate enough to be one of the few chosen before they sent out the mass 100,000 and 250,000 invites and was able to play the beta for quite literally months. To me, that was reward enough and I did not expect anything else. To my knowledge, Blizzard has NEVER given out a cosmetic award for participating in ANY OTHER BETA (though I'll admit, I could be mistaken).

    So, I'm quite surprised by this move by Blizzard. I can't exactly complain because I was lucky enough to be chosen to participate. Not only did I get to taste the game several months before most, I'm also getting special recognition for doing so. However, a friend of mine was invited during their 100,000 player invite. He quite literally logged on once, essentially told me he after playing that he's more excited for Torchlight 2, then never played again. The fact that someone like him is getting special recognition when others never got the chance does irritate me. The fact that people that literally never even so much as downloaded the client or logged in are getting rewarded when people that would have loved to participate, let alone receive a reward, are getting the shaft. That bugs me.

    I definitely sympathize with those that are upset. At this point, I can only count my blessings and be thankful that I was one of the lucky ones. I love this game and I'm more excited about it than any other game since probably Final Fantasy VII. However, just because I got lucky doesn't make it suck any less for those that weren't.
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 1

    posted a message on DH "Perma" INVISIBLE cheesy build
    I agree that Jay wasn't taking into consideration an entire build dedicated to skipping monster packs when he made his statement. I have a feeling it's entirely possible for this build to work out and it's plausible that you will be able to skip monsters due to it.

    That being said, overall I don't think the build will be overly effective. The moment you get his with Nightmarish or get stuck by a waller/jailer or some kind of 'silence' ability we may not yet know about that prevents you from using your abilities, or getting caught in random traps on said lootable objects and you'll likely end up dying.

    I think you may be able to manage to get to some chests/corpses etc. but overall, you will eventually die and those deaths + time spent getting to those lootable objects successfully won't award you a net gain. It's relatively common knowledge that chests/corpses and other lootable objects are relatively inferior to killing monsters for loot and treasure. There is the resplendent chests and if you can manage to get to several of them with minimal collateral damage, it may be worth it. However, on the other hand it could actually be surprisingly effective and extremely viable. All of this is just speculation anyway.

    At any rate, +1 for coming up with a truly unique character build.
    Posted in: Demon Hunter: The Dreadlands
  • 1

    posted a message on RMAH Fees? What's your opinion? Cast your vote!
    Well, I can definitely understand people's desire to use black market sites because of Blizzard's fees, but with the exception of the very high priced items, there's not much incentive for buyers to use them.

    The black market sites pretty much will only benefit the sellers now, not the buyers. If you try to sell a $20 item on a black market site and other people are selling the same $20 dollar item on the RMAH, what incentive would I have to use the black market site?

    So, the only way black market sites will be able to compete with the RMAH is if the sellers are selling items at discounted prices. At which point, when does it become worth it/not worth it? The item itself has to be sold for cheaper than it would on the RMAH, but sum of the sale after the black market site takes their cut (people seem to think they're free) has to be greater than the sum of the sale after Blizzard would has taken theirs. For an item that sells for $20 on the RMAH, how much of a discount would there need to be for people to be willing to use the 3rd party site instead? Would selling it for $19 dollars be enough? If not, you're better off using the RMAH because going lower than that and you wouldn't be making more profit.

    The more expensive the item, the greater the discount on black market sites can be. Selling an item that would sell for $200 on the RMAH for $190 on a black market site 'may' appeal to some people. However, the question to the buyer becomes, is 10 bucks worth the peace of mind knowing you'll be guaranteed to receive what you pay for and avoid being scammed as well as the efficiency the RMAH provides?

    IMO, only the super rare super expensive high quality items will have a place on black market sites. Anything worth more than $250 will have a place on 3rd party sites IMO. We'll just have to see how things pan out.
    Posted in: Old Trading
  • 1

    posted a message on RMAH Fees? What's your opinion? Cast your vote!
    Quote from exoteror

    I remember blizzard saying early on they might give people some free auction each week/month. And when an item sells they take a cut, was this mentioned at all?

    I would love a couple of free auctions a month to sell my gold I might accumulate or that rare item I find on the floor.

    This was back when the original format had listing fees and each player would get a certain number of free listings every week. However, if any of your free listings sold, you'd still be charged a fee for it selling and an additional fee if you wanted to cash out.

    However, they removed listing fees entirely so now you are free to put any item up on the AH for free and if it sells, they'll take their $1.00 and if you want to cash out, they'll take 15% of what remains. So, we don't get any 'freebies' on the fees they currently have in place, but we don't ever have to pay a listing fee now.
    Posted in: Old Trading
  • 1

    posted a message on Without Ladder Resets, D3 Replayability is Doomed.
    See, I'm one of those people that did not play Diablo 2 for years and years. Diablo 2, at it's prime, probably kept me entertained for a good year at most, if that. When LoD came out, I definitely played it again for several months afterwards.

    However, it's not a game I can just play over and over and over again. When I beat Hell difficulty, I'm done and I put the game away. What I end up doing is play the game for about a month, uninstall it, then a year later I'll reinstall it and play it again for a couple weeks with friends, uninstall etc. In that sense, D2 has good replay value, but I also do the same for lots of old games. Hell, just the other day I played Rygar again on an NES emulator all the way through, but I wouldn't say Rygar has good replay value.

    Late last year (probably Oct. or so) a friend of mine, who is also waiting for D3 now, said he never played the other Diablo games. I convinced him to buy D2, convinced my brother to reinstall it and we played 3 player all the way through Nightmare difficulty over a few weeks. It was an absolute blast! I had more fun playing D2, which is a good 10+ year old game than I usually do playing something like Left 4 Dead. It was awesome! However, once we beat Nightmare, we were pretty much done with it. I don't think any of us has played it again since.

    D3 I think will actually have more replay value for a gamer like myself than D2 did. When I read how people claim they have played D2 every day for the last 10 years, I first think to myself that they're full of it. Then I think, if they are in fact telling the truth, how the hell were they not completely bored out of their mind after that first year? Hell, even that first couple of months? The ladder resets alone I don't think makes much difference. It just resets the playing field and eliminates any hacked/duped gear, but ultimately it's the same game.

    When it came to D2, I can play it for a few weeks but then I need to step away from the game and give myself breathing room and play something fresh. After a while, I can go back to D2 and really enjoy it again for a couple of weeks. However, I don't agree that D2 had all that much replayability and disagree with people that think D3 will have even less.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.