• 1

    posted a message on Am I the only one for whom the introduction of ancient items basically ruins the game?
    Quote from MONK_P100»

    Sure RNG is an element in this game. But luck can't make you fully geared in ancient. Look at the videos, top players are those dedicated and skillful.

    No matter how the game has been changed since D2, there are always those well-known guys in this forum staying at top leading the game.

    Correct. It's the same argument for Hearthstone; If RNG was more than a small factor, you wouldn't see the SAME guys in legendary EVERY season. Skill > luck. In D3's case, it's knowing what build is most optimal for the gear you having while knowing how to optimally PLAY that build to maximize your loot gain.

    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Diablo 3 Issues
    Paragon isn't supposed to be WHY you play, it's an extra on the side benefit OF playing. Pretty much there so when you don't find any good loot for awhile you can know at least you got some paragon XP.



    I'd personally hate that change to Kadala, and honestly I don't really like her as it is. It's my own opinion but I hate knowing that I'll get most of the gear I want from her rather than actually farming.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Legit Players
    My instincts tell me OP might be a console player, which would explain his use of modded gear, which is abundant on consoles.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Purpose of Elemental Weapon Damage
    Originally the elemental type had an additional effect to all your attacks, such as holy did more damage to undead, poison did a dot, cold slows ect. Apparently internal testing found that players will always pick the one that increases their damage the most, and if all the damage was equal, they would always pick the one with the best CC.

    In other words, if it was between cold slowing, and fire adding a dot, everyone would want fire. If they made cold do the same damage as fire as well as slow, then obviously cold is better. Thus the dilemma.
    Posted in: Theorycrafting and Analysis
  • 1

    posted a message on patch release date question
    My money is on the patch releasing right as season one ends. Then a week later, season 2 starts.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Next Expansion Speculation
    Quote from mKrotiFy»
    Could that be the new expansion logo? This image was shared on the official diablo facebook page today and the game logo is way different than the one used in the previous facebook posts.







    ooooo, good eye.

    I'm tellin ya, skovos isles would make a fantastic environment, with an actual forest / light jungle / beach + ocean vibe, with of course old ruins spread about. Plus it could be the place that the Druids retreated too, because we all know Droods are da best and NEED to be in the next expansion!!1!
    Posted in: Lore & Storyline
  • 1

    posted a message on Bring back trading - Clan trading only - Diablo is missing certain social dynamics within the game
    "Bye guys for 30 days, brb"



    *Bleu has left the clan*

    *Bleu has joined the clan SuperBotStoreYay*

    *Bleu buys all the best BiS items from the superbotstore*



    "Bleu rejoins old clan" Hey everyone I just got BiS gear
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Travis Day Interview by Diablo IncGamers
    Quote from Darkrealmx»
    In Flux's defense these are the same questions that have been asked and not just by him. Seeing him poke Travis for an actual response is a good thing. I get a bit tired of reading the corporate line from fanboys. Good for Flux trying to make edgy comments to try and get some reaction.

    Don't you all get tired of NO ONE ever saying anything that has real value? "we feel this is in a good place(insert 6pc sets, barbs, monks, etc)" - how many times have you seen and actually AGREED with that statement? Are we not the customer? Do we not have input beyond "designing a legendary item workshop"? Did everyone forget PVP? Has everyone forgotten the "millions" of builds?

    That said, I am grateful for even the smallest scraps of changes that lead to something better because this isn't going to change anytime soon.
    Actually, no, you don't have input beyond that. Getting to even do the legendary workshop is actually a plus, because you're a paying customer for THEIR product. This entitlement attitude is just exponentially growing and it blows my mind. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Don't, however, try to claim that you've got some God-given right to decisions made for the product.

    And @ Ruksak, I completely agree. I'm honestly embarrassed to be a part of the same gamer base as that guy. I can't believe they couldn't get someone more professional in there.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Something Special at BLIZZCON for Diablo 3!!!
    Quote from ruksak»
    The big surprise for me was that they spent 2 days and a ton of money engaging the fans of a game that has already been sold. I expected them to discuss the direction D3 was heading, their intentions etc, discuss season 2 and maybe show a few new items. Instead, a full smorgasbord of offerings and discussion. For free. For a game already sold.

    They walk the walk, I'll give 'em that. Agree or disagree with their philosophies, like the ideas or not, they care. They have little reason to poor such effort into a game they sold 6 months ago, but they do it anyway.



    Pretty damn cool. I especially enjoyed the part where they discussed Josh effectively confronting the whole group at a meeting about the AH's. Where he just sat there saying nothing until the president asked why he wasn't speaking. He apparently chimed right in with "Kill it. Kill the AH's".

    Josh is a fuckin rockstar IMO.
    Oh yea for sure. I love Josh M. and I think he was the perfect replacement. I thought Jay was really nice, and probably had really good intentions, but they just tried SO HARD not to be D2, that it screwed them up.

    And yea, I'm totally stoked for Ancient items, that was something I didn't see coming. Same thing with the whole new area, I expected maybe new rift maps, but this sounds like an actual area, with a WP and everything, so that's really cool. Brand new sets? Yes fuckin sir. New stand alone legendaries? Hell yes. Better goblins, one of which will drop blood shards? Pretty please. There was a lot of good announcements, and I'm pretty positive they kept saying patch 2.1.2 would be really soon, with some of what was announced to be in a later patch. So all in all, a good times for D3 at blizzcon, when they had Hearthstone / Hots and OW take center stage.

    But, I really wish they wouldn't have built up some 'surprise' for Saturday, when everything that was talked about was already pretty much announced.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on (2.2) Delsere's Magnum Opus Possibilities
    Quote from Drgreenthump»
    It's an alternative for Firebird's.. Will probably be better at easier content and groups, but when you get to high GR's the dot of the Firebird's is still way superior to this.

    Though it's all still in development and there will be more items that might make Firebird's less of a requirement for those high GR's. Not that am complaining, this seems pretty sweet at least at first glance.
    IDK, the numbers are there. 1250% per sec, plus 5x the normal damage on ET / AO and MM. I think the set could beat firebirds. Especially at single target
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.