DiabloFans

I don't get Felyron either, but he may be referring to Hex, who sounds familiar to me.

The max level 85 doesn't include throne of destruction. I think that was just referencing straight D2. I want to say Baal on Hell was higher then 85.... anyway. Venator: The idea behind Inferno is that it is all a flat difficulty. Meaning that Act 1 inferno is just as difficult as Act 4 inferno. I imagine the majority of the difficulty difference between monsters will be the amount of abilities they have. There may be some level variation, but I would imagine Inferno Diablo is probably level 65 absolute max in a solo game. Now depending on how scaling works, he could be level 75 or 80 in a 4 player game...though I doubt it would be that high. While inferno will be hard to solo, I don't have any fears of a level 61 fallen 1 hitting me. seriously at that level, 1 level advantage on a cannon fodder will not suddenly make them a huge threat. Now, a pack/horde of fallen at level 61 would be a much bigger threat, but I think a solo lvl 60 could handle it. A group of Unburied/hundred pounders or the skeleton king surrounded by a bunch of skeletons would be a bit more difficult. But I would imagine still doable.

Otherwise you have the Raid idea from MMOs start up. I can see it now "Need full group for inferno run" messages everywhere. You will be able to solo, it will be hard, and whenever someone joins your game it will scale even harder.

II would imagine you would have to play through. I still say if the scaling works, you should be able to have a challenge solo or in a group o 2,3,4.

As long as they stick with the idea of avoiding cheap difficulty i am good. No 4 immunes or iron maiden. I think you will be able to solo hell. Jay has said they want to encourage party play, but not deter those who prefer to solo. I think inferno might require partying to an extent, but I don't think it will be impossible to solo.