- Atrumentis
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 6 months, and 15 days
Last active Thu, Oct, 18 2012 04:28:14
- 28 Followers
- 4,957 Total Posts
- 45 Thanks
-
Apr 12, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Server MaintenanceNope, the time marked on each post still doesn't update itself to your individual set time.Posted in: News
-
Apr 12, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Diablo 3 News Watchwhat banner?Posted in: News
I never understood Battlestar. It seemed cool, but it also seemed like it would never end and I would never find out whats going on. Reminds me of Lost lol. -
Apr 11, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Diablo 3 News Watchand why the hell would an ex-Blizzard North employee make a speech? they freaking quit because they were being treated badly! they aren't on friendly speech-making terms with Blizzard lol. and they have no reason to make a speech anyway. what would he say? "I'm proud of what the new team has done, I wish I hadn't have quit" ?? wtf lol.Posted in: News
everything about that post is wrong (except the important blizzard guy part)
its also wrong that he seemed to be talking friendly at the end, as if he knows us, but he doesn't know us at all. its his first freaking post.
I'll get the tar, you get the feathers. and someone else get a freaking guillotine. -
Apr 11, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchPosted in: NewsQuote from "Aussensaiter" »
"World of Warcraft Invitational."
You surely have no idea what you're taking bout, err?
Lol, I didn't notice that at first. Haha, biggest giveaway. I bet whoever wrote that is going 'oh crap' lol.
They probably copied and pasted the same thing on multiple forums.
and what the hell, 'working at Activision'? yeha, because a little activision drone hears important information when news reporters with real connections don't hear anything? ... -
Apr 10, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Medievaldragon Joins Diablo3.comlol, in my eyes, nothing has changed. Oh, except now his name is blue.Posted in: News
I mean like, he was practically considered a mod before anyway.
But still, welcome!
I like it when important people join in. -
Apr 9, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Server Maintenanceoh my god, preparing for an update, hmm?Posted in: News
-
Mar 31, 2008Atrumentis posted a message on Diablo 3 News WatchHas anyone looked back to before Starcraft II was announced to see what Blizzards reactions were to Starcraft questions? Or even before WoW? You know, its like when you watch a movie with a big twist in the end, and then you go back and watch it again to see where all the clues were...Posted in: News
-
May 14, 2007Atrumentis posted a message on Blizzard Posts Teaser Timeline!I'd say that they made it so that its a neutural design, which does not actually have any hints at any one world. That would be the smart thing to do. They probably figured that you would try to make something out of it anyway, no matter what they did. Which is true. But yeah, somehow I think that its starcraft. Also considering the recent patch update for starcraft.Posted in: News
-
Apr 19, 2007Atrumentis posted a message on Blizzcon 2007 Announced - Diablo 3 announcement please!But everything is always the perfect chance to announce something. Next year is also the perfect chance, and the year after. Though I do obviously still hope they say something this year.Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
And yeah, us going to hell in Act 4 was very confusing. We somehow managed to land at a heavenly outpost, while Diablo went straight past them. I think he was heading further into hell, but he got trapped by that angel that talks to us right before we go to fight him, remember? He didn't intend to stay there and wait for us. So yeah, Hell is definitely huge.
And yes, their 'dying' definitely needs to be explained abit more. I'm pretty sure they can never actualy die, only be ridden from this realm. But I want to hear it from someone official.
0
Maybe try,
Ordrem?
Talam?
Tilaem?
Taelam?
Lerando?
I'm making up names here. I personally like Taelam.
0
They still aren't much of one for material value, so having a 'vast city' would likely serve to practice their art without fear of scaring outsiders.
They never mention the name of the city, its only mentioned in the manual, but still never a name. So name it what you want.
0
The rogue from Tristram also went mad and tainted from the horrors of the monastary, so much that she is implied to have become Bloodraven.
The three Prime Evils have been weakened because a part of them was destroyed/fragmented when their stones were destroyed, am I right? But, haven't they simply been sent back to hell, because they no longer have a fleshy vessel that binds them to the mortal plane? Also, hell is still appearntly in a civil war, polarised by siding between Azmodan and Belial. If the Prime Evils return, the civil war would end, and Azmodan and Belial would likely suffer. They need to find a way to get human souls to side with them. I'm actually suspicious that their plan all along was to destroy the worldstone, which would somehow make their soul-capturing easier. Its implied that Sanctuary is now at mercy to Heaven and Hell, with no barricade to stop them. That also makes me think that something has happened to Trag'oul, because he is very much connected to Sanctuary. Or atleast, he has a part to play in regards to the Worldstone, considering neither heaven nor hell know about him.
0
They also seem to wander around sanctuary in solitude most of the time, only gathering for things like passing a test, or if it is something really important. They are taught to be independant. Though, I suppose, the elders still have to be somewhere. But then, they could just be in that same place as Trag'oul, which makes sense, cause thats where Rathma tends to stay and study.
0
LOL. Haha, aww thats funny. I like how you reacted, "I believe so sir".
When I first got Diablo II (with LoD) I only played single player. At first I was so excited about all the different characters that I wanted to try them all out at once, but they had too many skills, so I made a different character for each skill tree. So thats like... 19 characters lol! (not including passive skill trees of the Amazon and Barbarian). I wanted to play them all simultaneously, so each character was only like level 1-10, all in act one. It took me ages to get through the first few quests, it felt like Act 1 was the entire game. So I thought it was great, thinking that there's practically 5 games in one, knowing it would take me aaggess. But then my friend suggested to me, "Why don't you just choose one character?" haha, so I did. I don't know why I didn't do that in the first place lol.
I ended up being a fire druid and a lightning sorceress, making it all the way to Act 5 without repeating quests. I ended up killing diablo by myself with pretty crappy equipment at level 26-28ish, and killing Baal just over level 30. (both with alot of running back to town).
And then I went online, did lots of runs and stuff and got fully into the online community. But then a while later, after thinking that I can't even attempt diablo until a much higher level or with lots of other people, I realised that back in the day I used to be able to do it by myself at a lower level lol. I had become too dependant on other people, and forgot that the game is balanced so that you don't have to do runs or rely on other people or good equipment to be strong enough to get through it. I re-learnt that it is playable lol.
PS. Jumping up and exiting the game while in mid-air would look really cool.
0
Oh yea, and Kate Beckinsale would make a GREAT sorceress.
0
0
"Accurate reports on the nature of the horrors that lie below the church come to light more rarely than survivors. I have attempted to provide a base knowledge of what awaits you by searching through our vast libraries for historical and scientific tomes recounting the Horadrim's epic war against the three.
I have summarized the information that I discovered. Due to the length of time that has passed since most of the original accounts were written, and the uncertainty surrounding the present evil that plagues this land, I cannot guarantee the veracity of this information. I do, however, believe that this information is as accurate as possible under these trying circumstances."
- Vischar Orous
Cheif Librarian
Zharaesh Covenant
Brotherhood of the Vizjerei
That is part of the intro in the manual before describing the minions of hell, including the Overlords and including the part about Inarius. So we were right, the change in lore is more like a new discovery to update old information, rather than just scrapping previous information. Blizzard already covered themselves by having these paragraphs lol. Lucky.
BUT
there is one thing that really annoys me. They changed something that did not need to be changed. The symbol for Baal used on the LoD cover was originally the symbol for Mephisto. I actually noticed the change years ago, and it has been annoying me the whole time. This goes back to my 'upgrading is better than changing' thing that I said before. This is an unecessary change/swap. If however, Baal's symbol was upgraded, aka, made better, then it would be okay. But using something that was previously there is not okay. And what's the point? Baal's symbol looks just as cool as Mephisto's, its not like it was complete crap.
0
hmm, it seems that both Solomir and Phrozen Dragon have good opinions on changing the lore. Clearly, changing things is okay, as long as its efficient at changing. As in, making the story as good as possible with changing as little as possible. But yea, in the case of Inarius, I like the change. I suppose, our records just had it wrong, and we really had no idea how important Inarius really is. Though, the creation of Sanctuary has never really been mentioned before, so atleast they aren't changing the name of who created sanctuary, but instead introducing one for the first time. Addition/upgrades are better than changes/shifts.
0
0
0
Also, what about this quote from Knaak?
"Obviously, what happens after Inarius is turned over to Mephisto is up for conjecture."
Should we assume that all that torture stuff including the Overlords that was previously described happens, or something new? I guess it really is 'left up for conjecture' lol.
Yeah, I know that the classes are explained in lore, but they aren't on the timeline. If there is an official timeline somewhere (and that timeline seems to be pretty good), then I just want to see them on it. Also, there was a female Nephalem warrior fighting with the edyrem against the angels and demons, who is described as being similar to Serrenthia, but much more vicious (?) (or some other describing word). She could either be one of the starters of the Amazons (because they have three gods don't they?), or another class, or simply just a warrior-girl lol.
0
Hah, I can't think of a word either, and english is my only language. 'first-drafty' or even just 'drafty' makes perfect sense lol.
0
Old:
Inarius is but an angel that decends to the mortal realm
New:
Inarius is the mighty angel that created the mortal realm
Old:
He attacks Mephisto's temple, then is counterattacked and captured by Mephisto
New:
Uldyssian and the Edyrem bring him down, the Angiris Council deal with him, and hand him over to Mephisto as part of a deal to leave mortal men alone (for now).
In both versions he still has the same vain personality.
In the new version, we never found out what happened to Inarius once in the hands of Mephisto, but it seems reasonable to say that he suffers the same fate as in the old version - which then would also lead on to the creation of the Overlords.
So, really, there aren't that many problems. The Overlords can still exist, all that happened to Inarius can still exist, its just that Inarius is revealed to now be a hell of alot more important than he appeared to be before.
Also, both versions can exist, if you look at it this way:
(I filled in some gaps)
- Inarius creates Sanctuary
- All the events in the Sin War Trilogy take place
- Inarius is handed over to Mephisto
- Inarius somehow escapes Mephisto
- Inarius returns to Sanctuary and creates the "first" Cathedral of Light
- The Three know that he is weak and are only amused by his little escape
- Inarius builds an army and becomes more powerful than the Three expected
- Inarius gets revenge on Mephisto first for taking him in the first place (he also probably plans on getting revenge on the Angiris Council for handing him over)
- Mephisto hates Inarius for destroying his temple, and so he destroys Inarius' Cathedral and re-captures him, and turns his followers into Overlords
Where's the conflict now? Men regard his cathedral to be the first because the Angiris Council 'reset' the world and erased what Inarius had done, and thats why there are no records of him being the creator of Sanctuary or anything that happened. Only the Nephalem and Mendeln retained their memory.
And, someone needs to add into that timeline somewhere that the Nephalem (original humans, aka Rathma, Bulkathos, etc - not the edyrem) slowly rise and gain followers, creating the Barbarians and the Necromancers and the Amazon and stuff. Though, I suppose its not something that happens at a certain point, but rather something that happens over centuries.