• 1

    posted a message on Stop Freaking Out
    Edit* People ARE freaking out on here, just less :P The "worst fears" thread or whatever it was is ridiculous.

    Flux strikes me as someone who shouldn't be in a writing position.

    Frankly he comes off as the worst kind of D2 purist. Unwilling to believe any changes could be made in the new game that would improve the old one. And he can get kind of snide about it in his posts.

    Sometimes some of our writers here can be guilty of that too, but usually very mildly. You can tell they are trying to remain neutral. I appreciate that :)

    I for one am pro anything that makes the game better, be it from the old games or brand new. Blizz has an excellent track record in that respect, so there is nothing to worry about.

    Also, I'd like to point out that since this is a beta reveal, none of the changes are going to be significant enough to push the release back. The only thing that's gonna change that at this point is if there are major issues during the beta, which is unlikely :lol:
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 7

    posted a message on Stop Freaking Out
    Edit* To be fair, there's a lot less freaking out over here than on incgamers, but I don't have an account there :)

    There's a lot of rumors flying around about the NDA lift on the first. The most important thing to remember is that it's all unfounded bullshit.

    As far as I've seen the only thing any of this is based off of is a quote from Flux regarding a bashiok post on easy vs accessable:

    "The first topic that leaps to mind in terms of “too easy vs. accessible” is no longer valid, since that game feature has changed a lot since we last had public info about it. And there’s a new changed/feature that excellently illustrates this point, but I can’t comment on it yet."

    These are not words to send you running outside and screaming at pedestrians. Every time there's a Blizzcon or any other even we get features that have "changed a lot since we last had public info about [them]." This is not something new.

    Hell, the last big one we had was the new rune system, and it's freakin' AWESOME.

    Even if some of the weird things people are saying were true (though of course it's still almost certainly totally unfounded bullshit), they don't have the full story. It's far more likely any significant changes are going to be incredible and badass like the rune change than some sort of apocalyptic game-destroying nightmare.

    That's all, you can go back to fear-mongering now, I doubt most people will be reasonable enough to listen.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Blizzard, give us back the old UI !
    +1 for new UI. It's better. Even if all the rest of your reasons weren't bullshit, the fact that the new UI plays better trumps all of them.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Naughty boy leaking information.
    Quote from Cybersuicide

    Quote from OmniNom

    Wow, someone throws out a number as the date of the beta and it's legit? Y'all are gullible.

    I'm not denying the possibility that it's real, but it's pretty unlikely. There have been several fake leaks before this. They do it just to troll.

    There's no reason to leak it like this is the thing. These people are given press kits. If someone wanted to leak, they could give real screenshots, video, etc to someone else to post, or post it themselves in a discreet manner. They wouldn't need to speak vaguely on a twitter account.

    If he follows this up with media maybe it's worth buying into.

    SSSSHHHHHHH It gives us something to do! It is fun to think about, it is something worth clicking on!!

    Hey now, I'm refreshing the page every few minutes too :P

    I'm just highly skeptical.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Beta Content Discussion
    Quote from ScyberDragon

    I am really surprised by the limited scope of the beta. I am not even entirely sure why they need a public beta at all if they can test everything internally.

    Balance requires a lot of data to get just right. They can probably tune systems and mechanics balance from PvP for the most part, so I imagine it will be the biggest focus of the beta. Resource costs, weapon damage, ability damage ratios, range, cooldowns, every aspect of each class's abilities will need tweaking.

    Internal testing probably got them in the ballpark for most of their numbers--which is generally good enough for PvE--and with the beta they'll fine-tune them, so they'll be reasonably balanced for PvP.

    I know they're not trying to super-balance PvP, but even with minimal balancing they'll need the number of people the beta provides.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Amy Winehouse dead at 27
    Think of the worst, most stupid thing you've ever done in your life. The absolute worst thing. You don't have to post it, I know I never would. I would rather forget that it ever happened.

    All of you have something. Contemplate it.

    When you did it, you were probably either ignorant of how stupid it was, or you ignored the people that told you it was stupid. You decided to do it anyway, most likely because you were young and reckless. People do stupid things, in their formative years especially. Pretending like you never make terrible decisions is lying to yourself.

    You "chose" to perform that stupid act, just like a drug user "chooses" to use for the first time. It's pretty much unavoidable that someone does something desperately stupid like that at some point in their life.

    If you do something dangerous and injure yourself, or damage someone's property, or ruin some opportunity you had, you are punished by virtue of the act. You get the stick instead of the carrot.

    For someone that their stupid thing was some form of hard drug, you get the carrot. It doesn't feel like a stupid thing at all. You are rewarded for that first stupid ignorant decision. So you're that much more likely to repeat that mistake, and each time you do it's harder to undo it. Worse, if you try to stop you will feel violently ill for days or even weeks.

    Imagine if that were the case with the stupid thing you did.
    Posted in: Off-Topic
  • 2

    posted a message on Amy Winehouse dead at 27
    Quote from Hpnot1Q

    Quote from Aleatoriedad

    Quote from Hpnot1Q

    Being a fan or not does not matter to me, i have 0% respect for drug addicts/junkys, even if it was MY family. and dont care if someone has a problem with it, ur not family of hers so stop whining,
    Addiction is a disease. Regardless of your poor notion of what it means to lose somebody, she did more for people than you will ever do, in all likelihood.

    As an artist, she was appreciated and loved by millions, and, as I'm sure you will fail to understand, they felt a connection to her. Be it a disease, an accident or suicide that causes their death, you should have respect for somebody like that. She wasn't Hitler, she wasn't a dictator, and she never did you any wrong. She was a poor soul who happened to have talent.

    God help you when your lost loved one is mocked by someone else. And God help you if you or somebody close to you ever falls victim to addiction. You'd better not... whine.


    Right my post got deleted, so let me break it down for yah in a way less offencive, even tho im dieng to offend but i wont, not worh it.

    Adiction is a choise YOU make, it is in YOUR hands. Whiles on the other hand, a desease is something that tends to come againts your own will. There for saying these 2 things are the same is... ehm how do i say this wel mannerd, Out of the loigical, if you wil.

    OK first, you have a spellchecker in your browser. It's underlining all these words you're typing for a reason.

    SECOND, it's very easy to dismiss addicts as having made a choice. Not everyone is born in suburbia and educated on the dangers of drug use. If you have a genetic predisposition, and you are born somewhere that doesn't have information force-fed to you about the harm drug addiction can cause, it's not so clear cut.

    Not everyone is privy to the knowledge you are. This may be difficult for you, but try to put yourself in someone else's shoes. Imagine, for the sake of argument, that you had lived your life up to this moment without knowing coffee was an incredibly dangerous substance.

    You might have heard vague hints as to negative side effects, but nothing substantial. So that one time, back when you were in your teenage years, you tried a cup. For all you knew, it was just another thing adults did.

    Well, that was pretty good, so next time it's available you have some more. And the next time. Pretty soon you're buying it yourself. And then it's a daily ritual. All your extra money starts being poured into acquiring more. Any time spent without a hot cup in your hand is spent thinking about the next one. Finally, when your job won't let you drink it constantly during your shift, you quit.

    Broke, homeless, and still trying to get that next cup whenever you can, you finally realize how fucked you are. So you decide to quit.

    The first day is almost fine. You want to get a cup, but it's tolerable. You try to find something to distract you but it's all you can think about. You have trouble sleeping that night, thinking about the taste.

    The second day you start to feel sick. Your stomache tightens and loosens constantly, and any food you try to eat winds up on the ground again fifteen minutes later. It's OK though, food isn't really appealing. As night falls you try to sleep, but your thoughts of coffee and your rebelling stomache make it impossible. You feel exhausted and your eyes are grainy and painful from lack of sleep.

    The third day you start shivering uncontrollably, and sweat pours off your body no matter how cold you are. You can't sit still, and you still feel sick constantly. You try to eat again, but now your throat is so tight you can't swallow. You simply huddle in a corner and hope think about how much better you'd feel if you had one more cup.

    The fourth day it only feels worse, so you finally drag your ass back to your supplier and hand over the few coins you've collected over the last few days. The coffee makes everything go away--you feel alert and healthy almost instantly. But the feeling starts fading almost immediately, so you go back for another cup. And another. And another.

    You can't afford rehab if you're broke, and you can't avoid a trap you don't know exists.
    Posted in: Off-Topic
  • 1

    posted a message on Amy Winehouse dead at 27
    Quote from Aleatoriedad

    Quote from Hpnot1Q

    Being a fan or not does not matter to me, i have 0% respect for drug addicts/junkys, even if it was MY family. and dont care if someone has a problem with it, ur not family of hers so stop whining,
    Addiction is a disease. Regardless of your poor notion of what it means to lose somebody, she did more for people than you will ever do, in all likelihood.

    As an artist, she was appreciated and loved by millions, and, as I'm sure you will fail to understand, they felt a connection to her. Be it a disease, an accident or suicide that causes their death, you should have respect for somebody like that. She wasn't Hitler, she wasn't a dictator, and she never did you any wrong. She was a poor soul who happened to have talent.

    God help you when your lost loved one is mocked by someone else. And God help you if you or somebody close to you ever falls victim to addiction. You'd better not... whine.

    I'm personally not a fan of the "disease" label, but there's definitely a genetic component. There's a reason why certain groups of people and families have histories of substance abuse. American Indians, for example, have comparatively high rates of alcoholism due to a genetic predisposition.

    I think it's ironic that people are so quick to judge drug addicts when drugs are basically traps with little hope of escape. Once you're hooked on some of the harder stuff, the recovery rates are miniscule, because withdrawal is so incredibly painful and unpleasant. By comparison, the more subtle trap of obesity, is allowed to run rampant, and called a "lifestyle choice."

    There are so many psychological addictions with just as harmful ramifications as drug addiction, but lacking in the horrors of physical dependence. These addictions can be defeated without feeling sick and unable to sleep for days on end, pissing blood and sweating uncontrollably, or any of the other wonders of withdrawal. They can be defeated by a fraction of the self-control and support needed to defeat a physical addiction.

    But they keep doing. They keep feeding their obsessions that destroy their health and turn them into dull societal deadweight, same as the junkies, and then point and laugh at those drug addicts and mock them for their weakness.

    Personally, I think that's pretty messed up. Take a hard look at your own faults before you mock someone else's.

    *Not that I think the death of a singer is some huge deal. Not to be insensitive, but there are more important things going on. But this "holier than thou" attitude about addiction is ridiculous.
    Posted in: Off-Topic
  • 1

    posted a message on This is how Diablo 3 Should look
    You guys realize this dude is trolling right?
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 1

    posted a message on Storyline Diminishing?
    Quote from Aleatoriedad

    What do you mean it doesn't really continue where Diablo I left off?

    The rise of the Lord of Terror is the direct result of the events unfolded in the first game... in fact, the Dark Wanderer himself is the hero from Diablo I; the player.

    If anything, the story's gradually becoming more intricate. In Diablo I, the story was restricted to Tristram and its undergrounds, yet in Diablo II we have the Rogue Encampment, Lut Gholein, Kurast, Harrogath, Mount Arreat... Also, since Diablo I was released, there have been several books released, all of which give extra depth to the story we know from the games.

    Can you explain what you mean by drifted away?

    +1
    Posted in: Lore & Storyline
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.