Quote from AcidReign
Let's face it, we've all been addicted to Diablo II. And Diablo III is way more customizable in terms of character development, a.k.a. the core of the game. Now take that, and add a more tactical and thought-provoking combat system, new resource systems, better means of crafting, better vendors, dedicated PvP, and other new systems, Diablo III is shaping up to be one Hell of a game.
Pun intended.
Alas 'cept story wise, but that's another aspect which will go off topic.
But yes Diablo III is looking to be a great game
0
From what I've read there's no mention of a firewall, thread title misleading.
Edit: And what's this about there being 2 bills? If this is true can I have a link to the second one?
0
I remember back in the RoC era of WC3 where maps such as Curse of Time, DotA (the original by Eul), Footman Frenzy, Line Tower Defense, DoBRP, and Real Life where popular. And of course Lordaeron Tactics, Azeroth Wars, and DAoW. Damn...
But yeah WC3 was gold for its time.
0
Welcome to DFans
0
0
0
0
Or still has omnipotence but is apathetic for whatever reason, this also ties in with the "grand plan" mentioned earlier
0
Even if said being was all-knowing what is to truly know something? Perhaps instead of viewing someone's life journey as a road map think of it as a large tree with endless branches. Say God knows and fully understands this tree of someone and knows all the infinite conclusions on where the branches end, but as said God is is apathetic then it is up to the person him/herself to choose what path lies ahead of him/her no?
0
Then explain to me how omnipotence and omnipresence without beneficence or any other factor affects the concept of a person's free will in any way.
0
Haha the A) option
0
Yes you have the gist of it, this is part of the Catholic/Christian faith.
0
I argue to gain knowledge. This is why I prefer people back up there own opinions/arguments by themselves so the discourse can be mutually beneficial to all parties involved. If one party decides to piggyback upon another there is no benefit to either party as it will become a stale argument of repetition of points.
And 'sides, the purpose of a forum is to read and express opinions no?
0
I don't see the reasoning behind this, if anyone is to follow a plan they would have to know that the plan consists of AKA telling them what to do. What I see in Catholicism/Christianity is that they know God has a grand plan (as told by Jesus) said plan will be beneficial to all (IE getting into Heaven). Anything beyond this is all speculation and teachings from Jesus.
And nice to see you again Link
0
Omnipotence and omnipresence have no affect on "fate" I believe the term your looking for is beneficence which deems God will use said omnipotence and omnipresence to care for his creations yes?
Going more into your point, Catholics/Christians deem that God has a "Grand Plan" for everything, there is no dispute to this. They believe even though he shows apathy today, even though he's omnipotent, omnipresent, and beneficent, everything still is in accordance with his "Grand Plan." Basically, God knows all but he doesn't dictate what people do in how they die. If a person dies by lightning bolt God knows, if that same person instead gets shot by a gun God knows. This is what Catholics/Christians refer to as "God cannot be understood by mere humans/mortals."
You brought up the example of associating "free will" with "free rights" thus bringing in the variable of another human being with free will, not just God/Human relationship.
Also I'd appreciate it if you strengthen your own arguments instead of "piggy-back riding" onto others. It's really annoying and makes this discourse seem, well frankly stupid if you can't support your own stance by yourself.
0
You're still not understanding how free will works.
Everyone has free will, we both agree on this.
Free will is the ability to make conscious decisions or voluntary decisions. If another person uses free will to harm or constrain you this does not override your free will. If someone points a gun at me and tells me not to move or I'll die, I still have free will in deciding to move or not. Sure one choice wouldn't be the most prudent one but I still have the option to do so.
Let's go back to the police/citizen example. If the police arrest me and I'm pinned down to be handcuffed, I still possess free will in deciding whether to fight back defensively (IE move around alot) or just stay still and wait to be handcuffed.
Free will is constant not variable.