- Registered User
Member for 3 years, 9 months, and 5 days
Last active Sun, Aug, 18 2019 11:25:04
- 0 Followers
- 272 Total Posts
- 31 Thanks
Mar 30, 2016Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
I use it just for EB (not for diamond skin or anything else. i adjusted my farming for that reason)Quote from Psyborg
Well, statement such as "makes life easier" is not enough when u hit 1 key in order to cast more than the binded skill
It is programming --> not playing as intended, EXCEPT IF Blizz stated that autocast and macros are legal.
I know that it's probably not allowed. But if I would get banned for something that should be a feature. So be it. it would just be plain stupid and probably that's why they won't do that
Mar 29, 2016Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
when promoting gameplay where you need to click a key every 0.3 sec non-stop it would be stupid to ban macro users just for binding an autohotkey to a certain skill. (e.g in-geom / explosive blast )
Isn't the automatic way of game play (auto casting, macros) bannable ? Binding a key to do 2345243 skills is legal?
Well, if that is legal, then there is huge gap into bannable policies apart from the obvious (bots, 3rd party progs)
I even play without it in grifts but farming rifts with my wizard would be just stupid to spam that button for hours. it's not even an unfair advantage. it just makes life easier.
probably even that is not allowed but tbh it's so much more important to ban botters with unfair advantages. cus that is what destroys the game and not simple small things which could as well be promoted as a feature in a future patch
Mar 15, 2016Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
you mean ww/rend.
in vanilla hota was trash when using with skorn. well in fact hota was trash overall in vanilla. it was maybe somehow useful for farming demonic essences vs. yellow elites. but like ww shined when using dual wield.
skorn was clearly a rend weapon (and ofc ww cus it was the most op thing in vanilla (beside of maybe cm))
Feb 3, 2016Posted in: Hardcore Discussion
yeah you basically have 2 cheat deaths with each a 60 sec cd.
but beware. unstable anomaly is a much better cheat death skill.
beside of knocking enemies back it gives you a big shield buff which last a few seconds, the firebird 2 piece bonus only gives you full life after a short delay (gray screen for 1-2 seconds) and the meteor revives you.
I'm only playing softcore (since my bad pc cant handle any other fancy things ^^) but it happend several times that a molten explosion is building up while I'm in the "freezing gray state" and then the 2pc will do absolutely nothing for you. you just die another time.
probably it would be better if the firebird set procs first, since it's really not that reliable when it comes to saving you from death.
Feb 2, 2016Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
Yeah, I'm still playing Titan Quest IT every now and then. Somehow I like it alot more than the "new Titan Quest" Grim Dawn.
Much more fluid and the classes are more interesting. But that's just my opinion
It's my offline game of choice
Dec 28, 2015Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
completed it. but this survey just scratchs the surface.
when a new patch comes out i play alot longer and lose interest almost every time half through season. also i think alot (maybe even more than 50%?) of D3 players are 25 years or older.
also yeah after years of playing D3 more or less intensely I probably play it mainly cus of friends nowadays but i wouldn't count out things you've listed like new content and stuff...
Dec 23, 2015Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
on the wizard solo leaderboard there is in the top 10 a para 800ish guy cleared 69 in 1:28. This is impossible. Seems bugged. Just for the record
edit: it also seems to use the current paragon lvl as indicator. and not the paragon lvl with which the grift was completed (in some cases this is kinda not "fair"). in the game the paragon lvl of the clear is snapshotted
Dec 22, 2015horrax1 posted a message on broken promises; what does "consectuive non-critical hits" mean.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
the only time this is useful is when you don't need unity on your follower. oculus ring is even if you only stand 1 time each rift in the circle better than BP.
Yeah and since they have a base crit damage of 50% and the follower unique item can give you 100%. All is left is stacking attack speed. Rings of choice for me are oculus ring and Broken Promises.
and then there's hellfire ring and leorics for a small xp boost which i still would prefer over some non-exsistant follower dmg.
Dec 3, 2015Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
This is way too powerful. IMO it would be the best gem for almost any build that utilizes ATS and CD. Just movement and increase the stacks to 20.
GOGOK OF SWIFTNESS
-50.0+x% chance on hit to gain Swiftness, increasing your Attack Speed by 1% for 4 seconds. This effect stacks up to 15 times.
-Gain 1% Cooldown Reduction per stack of Swiftness.(Requires Rank 25)
-Each stack of swiftness grants 1% Movement Speed, 1% Critical Hit Damage and 1% Critical Hit Chance. (Requires Rank 50)
- This would be a nice bump to the gem, allowing it to be more widely beneficial, but not too overly broken
Other than that like already mentioned the idea itself is good but your suggestions need alot of tweaks
Nov 24, 2015horrax1 posted a message on The State of PARAGON and an example how to fix it (Paragon Leagues)Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
I rather like the OPs ideas but I agree that a simple filter would solve many problems regarding leaderboards. You can truely see where you stand in your "brackets".
Well i don't like it very much, it would be kinda bad to be pushing for let's say 600-900 leaderboard and when you are getting there you lvl to 901,It would be simpler if you could filter out everyone that has a specific paragon, say remove all paragon 1500+ from showing up on the leaderboard for you, no need to create a new ladder when the data shown is already present in the current ones, we just need options to filter it.
But....oh well, paragon needs to be revised again anyway. The suggestions for +1-2 mainstat for each plvl beyond 800 is also decent but I would prefer a complete rework which deals with the current plvl problems regarding leaderboards and powercreep.
You don't really customize your character with paragon which is the actual purpose for it. The stats shouldn't capping out and somehow not break the game. I think a system which revolves about diminishing returns would be kinda the best solution.
1 plvl point for increasing mainstat +5 (value can be as high as blizzard wishes, just to keep it simple we stay at +5 mainstat for each increase)
2 additional plvl points for increasing mainstat to +10
3 additional plvl points for increasing mainstat to +15, and so on and so forth... just to give an example.
also blizzard should give people more options to spend points in. 4 for each category is simple not enough and my suggestion would not help much with only 4 for each category.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Dec 11, 2015horrax1 posted a message on New PTR Patch datamined! - Patch 2.4 December 11thPosted in: News
i tried to make a woh build work. but it was just trash with either tal rasha or with delsere. thanks to blizz i can start trying again. So much theorycrafting in my head. Didn't had so much fun in D3 for a while. Many possibilities. Unfortunately they all were pretty bad compared to the top end build but now with that offhand it could be closer
Well, but....this offhand is obviously mandatory for a woh build. So on the other hand it limits my theorycraft possibilities. Well lets see if it makes it live exactly how it's worded right now
Nov 19, 2015Posted in: News
500% damage reduction is impossible since 100% is already being invincible
50% damage reduction + 50% damage reduction = 75% damage reduction. pls learn maths people.
sweeping wind will just give you 50% damage reduction when it's active regardless of stacks. the wording is just incorrect.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.