-
- Sabvre
- Registered User
-
Member for 14 years, 8 months, and 2 days
Last active Fri, Nov, 4 2016 22:23:30
- 2 Followers
- 1,603 Total Posts
- 119 Thanks
-
Feb 5, 20142
RasAlgethi24 posted a message on Blizzard removes enchanting for "60 items", oh but 2.0.1 60s can be enchanted...Manner, I think you make some real informative videos on builds, but in the forums you get way too worked up and your arguing style is not constructive, it often ends up in a flame fest. They have reasons to ban you.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion -
Feb 5, 2014
2
RasAlgethi24 posted a message on Blizzard removes enchanting for "60 items", oh but 2.0.1 60s can be enchanted...Ah I agree with them. I've bought the items I needed to enchant in RoS but I didnt spend much because I knew this was a possibility.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
And manner, no one's going to take you seriously when cant ague a point without resorting to "LOL", "Oh I got banned again". Stop creating multiple accounts here just to troll. -
Jan 21, 20143
Finder posted a message on BOA's purpose is bullshitPosted in: Diablo III General DiscussionDoes anyone else read these anti-BOA threads and posts and just hear AH Tycoons desperately trying to find anything to cling to to protect their ability to sell items?
-
Jan 12, 20144
ShoMi posted a message on Тhе problems that present 【INVIS】Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
me tarzan you jane ? -
Jan 10, 20144
Bleu42 posted a message on Can we please have torment on patch 2.01?Posted in: Diablo III General DiscussionYea, ACT 5, The Crusader, Rifts, Bounties, Gambling, The Mystic, Enchanting, Xmoging, Level 70, New skills and passives, New legendaries, ect. I can't believe they have the stones to charge $39.99!!!
Wah.
-
Dec 21, 2013
2
lorien1973 posted a message on blizzard a big disappoinment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Posted in: Diablo III General DiscussionI'm more upset with your English teacher.
-
Dec 21, 20132
miles_dryden posted a message on blizzard a big disappoinment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
2/10, not angry enough. Need more ragetears.Quote from myfirst
i am very upset with blizzard because they never fixed d3 and what i am suppose to b happy there coming ouy with an xpansion,that doesnt make it write and wrong is wrong.i have to buy ros because loot 2.o is a joke another 40 dollars,but w8 i dont think i am spending anymore money on them,very disappointed with them,and i will not sweep this under the rug.alls they did is created a small bandade on a very big gashing open cut hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm whats up with that? -
Dec 20, 20134
Slayerviper posted a message on Reaper of souls Witch Doctor T6 AZMO world record? In 2 min 7 second kill by TUrKBeta world record builds using glitches... damn everybody wants their 1 second of fame, what a sad world this is. I should go for the world record of the biggest shit, you know just because we need a world record for everything in existence.Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion -
Dec 20, 2013
4
NoxiousGLHF posted a message on Reaper of souls Witch Doctor T6 AZMO world record? In 2 min 7 second kill by TUrKPosted in: Diablo III General DiscussionIf you're using Creeping Death, it's a bug. The splash damage total is calculated based on the damage dealt for the total duration of the DoT, which is insanely long with Creeping Death and thus creates insanely high numbers. I reported this to Blizzard, so I'm not sure whether or not you were aware of how silly and dumb this glitch was.
Since you didn't post your build, I can't really say for sure you're using the "bug", but an 11 Billion crit kinda makes me wonder.
This has to be a glitch, otherwise there is absolutely no viability to be found ANYWHERE but in the DoT skills + Splash Damage + Creeping Death.
-
Dec 19, 2013
4
miles_dryden posted a message on RoS - Overpriced in EU?Posted in: Diablo III General DiscussionI like how when Maka has run out of arguments or counter-points, he resorts to sarcasm.
That, or changes his mind on what was being argued in the first place.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
1
This whole "don't tell me how to play" bullshit argument is tiresome.... it's a fucking game.. you know.. with defined rules... and defined intentions.
If the developers want you to play, or not play a certain way, then accept it or fuck off.... This game isn't for you.. move on.
It's THEIR game.. they created it. Blizzard decided to NOT make Diablo 3 a sandbox... sorry.
5
Blizzard just gave us:
Character permanence - you can't just flip item builds at the drop of a hat.
Unique characters - FOTM item builds will be less frequent.
No hacks/bots/third party sites
Chance of balanced PVP - there can be assumed strength progression based on time played vs statistical chances and std deviation.
Defined character progression - you can't just stack your little brother/ neighbor on their first day playing.
Additional reason to party up - 4 friends playing together is 4x the drops.
Yet you guys still whine and bitch. You guys will never be happy with this game.... if blizzard changed this to an exact D2 clone, people would scream about all the problems that were part of D2....
1
Trading end game items is the path of least resistance. Especially when you eBay all your gear on your next rage quit ruksak ;). Now someone else just went from zero to sixty in 1 second flat.
Again we just eliminated spam, botting, account compromises, third party sites, and overall pay to win.
2
1.) No bots
2.) No third party sites
3.) Sub prime drops will now appear good as players are now on an even playing field. No more players such as Athene that get fed and make everyone else think their gear sucks. No more trade scams/tycoons.
4.) PvP can finally find a center of balance. Just like esports, everyone has an even playing field. No ability to use real money.. no ability to use social connections to stack up.
5.) FINDING items is actually the end game like it was meant to be....
1
When you have a structure of varying data sizes, your math is not correct. Each data element has a defined size, regardless of whether or not it's fully used (store a 1 in a long int).
Element one is a bool, element two is a long int... you don't take the starting address + average the two to find its position in memory... it's the starting address + index looping through each element's size.
In the above example the address of a third element would be: starting address+ size of bool+size of long int (again varies on the system)
2
No. It only means you could wear that that leather bra (tier 1) on your she barb with max level stats.
1
1
No -- They haven't said anything at all themselves, the xpac website states "Coming 2014".
2