DiabloFans

Okay, so I'm not taking credit for this Idea, but I'm building upon it. Somewhere on here I saw someone suggested the Valkyrie. Well, IMO, I think that could be the perfect class to bring in as the 5th class (sorry if this was already stated here, but I'm too lazy go go through all 21 pages). So here's why:

1) The Valkyrie could satisfy the need that some people feel for a "holy warror". Yes, Valkyrie's aren't the standard and archetypal Holy Warrior that we all know and love, but they fight for a Greater Good, and serve the souls of the warrior who died in battle in the mythological location, Valhalla.

2) The Valkyrie could be a versatile warrior, fighting both with ranged and melee weapons. Since Valkyrie's protect and aid the souls of fallen warriors, they have access to some of the best training possible, and could be knowledgeable in pretty much any fighting/weapon technique. This could easily solve the "we need a ranged fighter" problem, as well as sticking to the belief that all the characters will be balanced enough to fight with both ranged and melee weapons.

3) There are some people who really want to bring back the Amazon and/or the Rogue. This could take that spot as it is very close, yet oh so different.

Despite these reasons, there is the big problem with this theory, which would be the dual-sex of the class. Valkyries are typically female. I don't know of any male Valkyries, so Blizzard could possibly make up their own Valkyrie/Valhalla lore, or they could just use a different name but use the idea.

I personally would love a Druid-Amazon/Rogue mix, but something that I can't wrap my head around is if the new class were to be ranged and have shapeshifting...how could you be ranged in Werewolf (or any other were-thing) mode?

Your clouds looks good and all, but another way you can do them to get them to looks really wispy and stuff is to paint the entire sky, and when the paint is still damp (not soaked. The paint should just have a shine to it) you take a clean brush, dip it in clean water, and scrub out the paint. Not too hard though, because it'll damage the canvas.

Edit: When you dip the paint brush in water, get the excess water off of it first.

I hate anime as well. I personally hate that there's little realism in anime, and all the characters look like they're brothers and sisters. I thought it was cool when it first became popular, but now it's just gone overboard.

I definitely agree with Repeccing. With me having a mild-form of ADD and not having the patience to go to the doctor, I would always get bored with a character or a character build halfway through nightmare. This way I don't have to start all over again.

They've already stated that the Necro isn't going to be in D3, but they said that he will appear in further expansions. It's also speculated that the expansions will hold to D2:LOD where after a while, Blizzard will think up a new class then release it for people to go through the game with. Necro's the only pretty much confirmed class.

i can't really see a wizened spell caster walking about hitting armored creatures with a thin wooden wand without instant breakage. From a realistic perspective It's ranged attack wand or no wand. Of course, this game isn't famous for its realism.

That's why to look real bad ass, sometimes I'd have my Sorc or Necro not have a weapon. Especially useful with a maxed out and fully synergized Enchant, so my Sorc could actually contend with a lot of enemies barehanded.

But on topic, I guess having wands ranged adds another layer of depth to the game.

I just said it in spite of what you said. haha. I thought it was Diablo, just that with him being re-vamped and changed around that he could be a handful of other things too.

Ahem... Trag'Oul

Sorry. Wasn't really into the background of Diablo and stuff until like a month ago...

I thought the movie was better than the others in consideration to sticking to the book. I would say GoF was better, but I really wanted to see the Sphinx...but they cut it out. But personally...I didn't like the Burning of the Weasley's house...I mean...where are Bill and Fleur going to get married...IF they get married since it wasn't even mentioned. Also, I'd have rather had Harry been restrained when Dumbledore was up in the Astronomy Tower. I think that's imperative to the guilt he feels all throughout the seventh book. Instead, he sat there and just watched Snape do it (And they revealed his allegiance pretty much). But whatever. Better with respect to plot than the other movies.

No need to apologize! To be stubborn is sometimes good! Look at me! If I wasn't stubborn, some people would still think that the demon from the end of the cinematic is not Diablo!

I don't think the demon at the end of the cinematic is Diablo...

But anyways...umm... well i've got nothing now that the issue was resolved.:D

Who would go to all that trouble just to rebuild a bunch of dungeons that were once inhabited by demons and undead?

Maybe it wasn't the townspeople? Perhaps the demons and undead that resided deep in the depths of the catacombs got bored and started tinkering with hammers and nails?? But in all seriousness, I think that the evil presence beneath the Cathedral has gotten stronger since the destruction of the Worldstone, therefore by magical means the catacombs were rebuilt/expanded.

That was the same way with me. My neighbor and his grandson were avid Warcraft fans, so I decided to try it and was completely disappointed in it, thinking it was just wasting time that Blizzard could be using to work on D3. Ha. Whatever though. The time has come, and I just can't wait until it arrives.

This is why I hate playing Nonladder, every time I play nonladder, something gets fucked up, whether it is killing Duriel but not getting quest complete, not being able to pick up cube because I apparently already have one, which I don't, and now this cow mess.

I understand you. This is why I'm kinda on the wall about D3...it's a whole new set of problems.

But on-topic...I'm completely stumped. Idk what to do. :confused:

A lot of people are overexcited about Diablo III, and many still cling to the whole "Blizzard makes great games" idea, I'm not sure how true that is anymore, not after WoW, and not with how much time they take while deleting features instead of adding them. We need to remember that Diablo II has been done quite a while ago.

True, True. But I'll cling on to that idea, because I've been waiting for Diablo 3 since I beat Diablo II: LOD the first time. And Honestly, I wouldn't care if it was a bad game anyways since I don't play that many games. I have a few PS2 games, Gamecube, and Diablo. That's about it. So I'll play whatever they decide to market as Diablo 3, and so far...me likey.

Are you sure you "Save and Exit"ed? Like, that you weren't kicked off sometime after killing Baal, and when you went back on you tried Cow Level. There have been a couple times where I've been kicked off and it resulted in the last quest I finished not saving.