1
Hi guys, I made a channel for those who want to make their own collectibles.
my first video is..... Sculpting Witch Doctor Set Mundunugu's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbfSqhFpB40&t=512s
Help me make the channel grow.
Don't forget to like and share to help me make more videos.
Next week I'm going to make the new demon hunter set which is very beautiful
3
From D4 I want to see superb isometric engine allowing high interaction with the enemies and the environment. Besides smashing skulls in all possible directions, I want to cut tunnels in mountains with a soso beam, destroy trees near the battle with my barb swings, bring the dust and sand in the air with my monk, make holes in castles with my amazon arrows and I want all of this to have an EFFECT on how the AI adjusts to the battle. That will be D4 for me. Anything less will be milking of the old cow again.
1
Don't you mean... "credible"... #derp
1
Just for info 2.6.1 is live on US, so hopefully coming later https://us.battle.net/d3/en/blog/21115840
2
I'd also like to echo that these are the initial numbers heading into a PTR. And from my recollection, though there are exceptions, Blizzard intentionally over shoots and then reels back. That has been their maxim historically for better or worse.
By employing extreme changes they generate more interest (if only superficial) to play test the 'thing'. Higher numbers of people play testing, potentially brings in more feedback, which in turn provides them with more data to decide where to go. If the changes were minor out of the gate I believe the interest to play whatever it is they're testing wanes. Philosophically speaking their take on modifying existing content might look egregious but I believe there's intent to get it right by generating buzz. Otherwise, yeah, they are in fact pissing into the wind and I hope they would invest their time more wisely.
This is all specious reasoning on my part. So please take it with a grain of salt.
TL:DR; Just bear in mind these changes are in the PTR precisely because they don't rightly know where the numbers should be. And that they are high most likely on purpose to get more people testing boundaries.
1
@truerasp,
I agree that primal ancients are not visual at first, but when hover over a primal it does a give a cool red border with teeth braided in, and therefore visually stands out in a cool way. But the most important aspect about primal ancients is that they are rare and potentially perfect, the best you can get, end game gears. Because of this, they will be coveted and worthy to be sought after. I've been around this game from the beginning and see how people grind out even the smallest improvement or advantage. Primal Ancients will be no different, players will want them and grind till they find them.
1
Well if i had to choose from:
- primals and no other changes
- no changes at all
I will choose primals.
4
I believe there is going to be a couple new zones as well, though I am not sure how that is supposed to work? perhaps the new zones will be released to everyone in a content patch, and then unlocking the Necro requries the pack purchase?Quote from UncleDan2017»
I'm curious to see what you guys think about what the Necromancer should have and what items they should bring back.
I'm wondering if they will bring back Runewords. Fortitude, Heart of the Oak, Call To Arms, Enigma, Exile, Etc...
It would be interesting to how they work. Of course they would have to be normal items with many sockets. They can be socketed with 6 gems. Though that would give them a max amount of 1680 of any stat gem you put in there, and a max of 468 All Resist, but it wouldn't have any ability for anything else. So I think that would balance it out.
As near as I can figure out from what I have read all they are doing is adding another class. No runewords or any other major changes, although I would've loved to see a major change like that. They've been careful to refer to it as a pack rather than an expansion to the game.
They appear to be just running a new class through the same existing content. So, some new skills and passives. I'm sure it will be strong enough of a class to have either 1 or 2 Necs Meta- Mandatory so they can sell as many Necs as possible.
3
it's pretty weird though that this guy posts just these pictures.. for the last 4 years.. on a diablo forum. I checked and his last diablo-related thread was in 2012.
2
It is only seen as a failure by time-frozen D2 fan boys, and PoE players. For the people that actually play it, D3 is a very successful game. I bet after D4 comes out, there will be people who finally appreciate D3 for what it is.
1
Really great ideas for both QoL improvements and expanding on end-game aspects such as ubers and item crafting. I hope Blizzard does see this post.
1
Sticking rune combinations into then to make them. The suspense of seeing how it rolls after you stick the runes into place. The fact that runewords harbored some of the most powerful and original / game play changing items. (Enigma for teleport, etc..). The fact that you get to choose your base, so superior or crude base items actually made a difference. Versatility of common runewords early on during the leveling process. Different runewords featured for different seasons, incentive to play season, and differentiating 1 season from another. The adding of interesting future runewords to help fill itmlemization gaps. Giving the player a feeling that they have collected all of the required items, and manually forging your runeword rather than just gambling or forging at the blacksmith. I can go on and on if you want me to.
1
Hi, I recently started receiving mails at my new apartment, and I am in need of a cool letter opener. Other than Slipka's Letter Opener being a totally useless Diablo 3 item, I would really love if you guys added this to your merchandise store. I would certainly buy it, and your item would no longer be useless. Think of the possibilities Blizzard, think of the $$$$!
1
While they are making the game easier, they are shifting the scale. There are going to be 3 more torments added, and probably more because 13 would be a strange number to stop at. Let's stop obsessing about the current state of the game and focus on the evolving product that the devs have in store for us. Ever since RoS launched, D3 has not been the 'what you see is what you get' game for longer than 3-4 months at a time. These changes that are making the game easier are not in fact making it easier (achievements maybe), just shifting the scale. T13 will be as hard as T10, greater rifts have no cap, so the change in achievement requirements barely changes the endgame at all, it just makes it faster for certain casual players to get things like portraits and stash tabs more easily. In my eyes, they are simply making the game more fun and appealing over all, and maybe this will bring some more desperately needed new players to make the servers more lively again.
2
I'm sure this thread only exists so that top streamers have a written account of: "hey look at me Blizz, here is written proof that I don't bot. Please never ban me thanks. PS we are making money off your game just from streaming it" oh the sarcasm of it all, and so many unrealistic expectations of Blizz coming from the already spoiled playerbase.
1
Now I'm not here to support botters or anything, but are you really prepared to see the player base get cut in half? Also, everything in this game is player bound and betting only really provides someone personal benefit. The only exception see to this is players complaining that the leader boards are ruined by botters. That part is definitely true.