As I said it was an OK game but I would not call it Fallout because of the differences they made in it, for example: making a pipboy 3000, they said in the previous games that they never made a newer version of the pipboy 2000. And why are children immortal, why are there vampires in a post-apocalyptic world, why are supermutants yellow? If FO3 and oblivion are not RPG why are they awarded RPG of the year?
It is a OK game, but it is far from good enough to be called fallout. I have been playing fallout 1 and 2 almost as much as diablo. I did not expected much from this game since it was bethesda who was making it (I did not like oblivion), bethesda did huge mistakes in for example making it a FPS game with pause And the quests are already very linear in the first run, doing all the fetchquests again (collecting mines, bottlecaps, nukecolas, certain weapon etc.) can not be fun. The high replay value from Fallout 1 & Fallout 2 was done through its different solutions to problems and by playing it with a diferent character, none of that is possible in F3 For people who are thinking of buying Fallout 3 I reccomend that you buy yourself a copy of Fallout 1 and 2 and play those instead of fallout 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2. Deep Purple
3. Lynyrd Skynyrd
4. Pink Floyd
5. Bruce Springsteen
and all that is country and rock
0
0