DiabloFans

I would rather say that HG:L Art direction was the perfect theme for Diablo despite the modern twist of modern gothic.

Hellgate could have been a great game sadly for the poor background.
but no doubt Hellgate: london art direction should had been In Diablo 3 which what the Royal fans love about it mainly the Art theme of it.

Why I was amaze about HG:L because the theme & art direction which caught me playing it.

The author hates HG:L , n at some points i do agree when at times it became too draggy

On HG:L despite the weakness , ill give FULL credit on the the art direction a 5 Star flat out on that!

Diablo 3 hopefully n should be much better unless player can adjust their lighting & theme.:cool:.

Q: How long have you been working on Diablo 3?
A: It's been in dev for quite a number of years. We had it up at Blizzard North for a couple of years and it's been at Bliz South for a while. Probably about 4 overall. (Blizzard North closed in fall 2005, nearly 3 years before the WWI. It's known that preliminary work began on Diablo 3 back in 2000 and it was well underway by 2002, though almost all the work the Bliz North guys put in was thrown out when the project moved to Irvine and started virtually from scratch.)

I wander how was that work art direction went ... i bet it would had been way more gothic ...;)

Quote from "Asynchronic" »

I realize they are living things, but Diablo doesn't ever have armor. His scaley, rough hide IS his armor. The Lord of Terror wouldn't be running around exposed and vulnerable. And what would the angels look like without armor? Blobs of light? The two are one in the same, not in form but in function.

Anyhow i just luv ur Signature Image . That looks freaky scary, diablo or someone should look more like that. lol

Yeah believe so ,Diablo may make a cameo but I believe this game is reserved for the two unknown evils.:confused:

Wow then shall get the book soon then ,yeah indeed how old is Cain gonna be ? he is like immortal or sumthing?lol

1 January 2010... or... 10 October 2010
01/01/10... :confused:r... 10/10/10

1 January 2010... or... 10 October 2010
01/01/10... :confused:r... 10/10/10

I Would guess....hmmmmm..[01/01/10] ..
or
it would be ridiculously On (10/10/10)

(either this would be abit to long but if Bloody so! the final product better be HELL GOOD! ;-)