• 0

    posted a message on Discussion: The last class is NOT a ranged class
    Quote from "blackcat0" »
    I think blizzard might actually not put bows/crossbows into game at all and surprise people. There might be some kind of alternative range weaponry in which new class might specialize. Example,
    Soul Summoner (shooting souls at range, colecting weapons as souls) or..
    Niggerian (obvious jk, but showing possiblities, using bumerangs of some sord)

    And actually in D3 it seem that every class shall specialize in certain weaponry anyway. Not that much weapon trading inbetween classess ..



    bows are already in the game
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on Battle.net - now 5$ a month (from "trusted source")
    THIS JUST IN FROM MORE TRUSTIER SOURCES

    I am awesome

    Confirm/Deny?
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on deleting threads (original post)
    Quote from "emilemil1" »
    1. Did you change the default subscription settings to "no email notification"?

    2. Does all subscription have a "none" to the far right?


    ...

    I can program in 5 different languages but I can't set forum options :confused:
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo III Release "still a long way to go"
    Quote from "Royalkin" »

    I'm no marketing wizard, but I would think announcing a year out from release would generate plenty of excitement and hype for a game. I guess the suits at Blizzard HQ disagree.

    Sad...


    hmm

    do you have an mmo with 12 million subs?

    or an arpg series that sold 18million?

    or a rts that sold 10million?

    I'm thinking blizzard HQ disagrees because they have proven themselves
    Posted in: News & Announcements
  • 0

    posted a message on Discussion: The last class is NOT a ranged class
    Quote from "vl" »
    The 5th class should be a dunpeal, or half human/half vampire. Reasoning for fighting against hell would be that its corrupting all humans into demons, therefore eliminating their food (human blood). Not good nor evil, a mercenary type character that can use both ranged and close attacks with special abilities including those of a traditional vampire or super human senses.


    considering there were vampires in d2....

    and they were on the side of Diablo and Baal....

    I don't think they are concerned with lack of food

    and I thought vampires were 100% human, or humans were 100% vampire, idk how you can be both
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on deleting threads (original post)
    I tried that too but I still get emailed randomly

    and in my 3 years here it has never happened

    I reported it but I was told I was dumb and you just click do not sub but it still gives me subs
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on since i cant send this to bashiok i hope he still sees this.
    Quote from "-Zod-" »
    Dude i dont care what you say, i just dont agree with auto stat points... that is all.

    ps...


    yep, people who can't argue because they have no facts to stand on usually don't

    it is ok though, you and moke are going to have fun playing diablo 3 with autostats!
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Discussion: The last class is NOT a ranged class
    Quote from "emilemil1" »


    And we should not look at the Amazon and think: "The Amazon sucked in D2, so a ranged class in D3 would probably suck too."


    zon wasn't bad, just, it wasn't a necro
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on since i cant send this to bashiok i hope he still sees this.
    Quote from "-Zod-" »
    lol the people who agree with these wowish features clearly are new to the diablo series, and have no idea what they actually old schoolers prefer, a generation has gone by playing the game.


    lol your level 40 with a cleglaw set is not old school, and since you are defending the OPs statement, I consider you to be new at diablo since none of the classes required one extra point in mana
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Discussion: The last class is NOT a ranged class
    Quote from "Laio" »
    do you really think there is this almost sick need for a ranged class on d3?

    i do understand that in Wow and other games, but i'm not sure about diablo's need for a primarily ranged class.

    specially if there is going to be a more number of monsters on screen, and you won't have time to use potions and you have to run into health orbs...


    how does that make sense?

    as a rdps you will be taking less damage and you won't need to run into health orbs as often
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on since i cant send this to bashiok i hope he still sees this.
    Quote from "Pryda" »
    Just so you know.. the D2 stat system is pretty awful!
    Character customization with stat points is the past, we have better systems now.


    yea I don't think spamming vitality after u got enough str and dex to use weps and armor was really "customizing lulzolzl"

    and OP, there was really only 1 way to spend stats, a mathematical "best" choice, something the diablo 3 team wants to avoid (which also gives them a chance to focus on trees so they don't take the WoW route of "This spec is best dps by 5%")

    also, LOLyou put stats into mana
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 3 - my 2 cents
    Quote from "SFJake" »
    So, you come back years later to bump a 2 years old post to prove yourself to a community that isn't even the same anymore? And these are 50% of the posts you ever made?

    Also, was the game even announced back then? I really don't remember hearing much about D3 2 years ago.

    Anyway. This is in violation of the forum's rules. You have no valid reason to bump your old topic.

    double :necro: !
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on A poll from..
    ign.com is filled with consolekiddies and people who <3 mainstream

    and even though blizzard sells games better than any other company, they still aren't "mainstream"

    like say, EA and m$

    poll does not factor in people who have standards and do not view ign
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on tyrael evil??
    it would be more of a "Tyrael was corrupted" thing, not becoming evil for no reason thing

    but Tyrael was probably being played by Belial in the worldstone (so he could destroy it and lulz at everyone) just as Baal played Tyrael to get his soulstone

    but no one knows till d3 comes out 2020!
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Old UI vs New UI
    Quote from "Valtonis" »
    if they are gonna have influences from WoW i hope we get to have custom GUI


    they already said no to that

    several times

    in several interviews

    I feel bad for the mods here who work hard in posting interviews and getting news for all of you and you refuse to read it
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.