i would hate to have too many expansions. i got so sick of WoW when they announced WotLK and so i quit. WoW is a dying star, so if blizz wants to replace it with diablo, meh
the reason is because the WD is a very hard class to make skills for. with the barbarian, its easy. anything that bashes monsters faces in is fair game. same with the wizard, shes a pure spellcaster, nothing more. but the WD is not a total spellcaster, so it will take blizzard a while to create perfect skils for him.
To understand this thread, I'm going to backtrack to the release of the barb and WD
As I was reading some articles and forums that occurred when the gameplay vid was released, Jay Wilson commented that the WD was not like the necromancer. Similar in a few ways, but not meant to be a remake of a beloved class. I read a few polls, and most people predicted a MAGE class for the 3rd class release. the wizard, Wilson says, is not a "mage" character. she doesn't only have elemental skills (read the skill tree people. shes not a sorc). Of the 3 classes, only the barb is a copy (DUH!!!).
To the point - most people think that blizzard is following a strict class guideline from diablo 2. news flash - they're not. sure, they look like a necro and sorc from just a glance, but imo the wizard and WD are quite unique classes. so why should blizzard make a new amazon and paladin?
In your eyes, this may be completely false. but i'm just trying to make a point, blizzard is much more creative than you think.
i know it came out a while ago, but did anyone else think that Brisingr was a total disappointment? i mean, i could have read 5 pages of the book and understand what happens. half of it was Roran and Katrina talking, and the ending was so anticlimatic. "how to make and kill a shade in 30seconds". really?
what do you think about the new GnR album, Chinese Democracy?
I say that Axl is an idiot for replacing everyone in the band and still calling them Guns n' Roses, but if it is good music I'll buy it and listen to it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
As I was reading some articles and forums that occurred when the gameplay vid was released, Jay Wilson commented that the WD was not like the necromancer. Similar in a few ways, but not meant to be a remake of a beloved class. I read a few polls, and most people predicted a MAGE class for the 3rd class release. the wizard, Wilson says, is not a "mage" character. she doesn't only have elemental skills (read the skill tree people. shes not a sorc). Of the 3 classes, only the barb is a copy (DUH!!!).
To the point - most people think that blizzard is following a strict class guideline from diablo 2. news flash - they're not. sure, they look like a necro and sorc from just a glance, but imo the wizard and WD are quite unique classes. so why should blizzard make a new amazon and paladin?
In your eyes, this may be completely false. but i'm just trying to make a point, blizzard is much more creative than you think.
0
0
0
0
0
I say that Axl is an idiot for replacing everyone in the band and still calling them Guns n' Roses, but if it is good music I'll buy it and listen to it.
0
2) Velvet Revolver
3) Audioslave
4) Coheed & Cambria
5) System of a Down