Quote fromYou are dumb.
This means that you can't hostile other people. So in order to pk we will probably have to create special games(arena kind of games) for pvp only. Which is gay.
This is wrong, all they needed to do was add a timer to stop tppk, which is the only real exploit in d2's pvp system.
Is it gay because you now require actual skill to kill other people? :rolleyes:
If you need a flawed pvp system where you can gank unwilling and lower lvl players to feel powerful then you are the f*ggot here sir.
0
Is it gay because you now require actual skill to kill other people? :rolleyes:
If you need a flawed pvp system where you can gank unwilling and lower lvl players to feel powerful then you are the f*ggot here sir.
0
I think a build around such skills would be very challeging and entertaining.
0
Also I'd like it if the monsters could tell when you are low on health and replace their defensive tactics for very aggresive ones so that you won't be able to escape alive.
0
About that, I was looking at the screenshot in your sig and just noticed that hotkeys 5 and 6 are different from the skill hotkeys (1-4), hotkey 5 even has scrolls in it so it's possible that hotkey 6 could work as a mini potion belt intended for serious emergencies maybe.
0
What? How could the video be rigged if it is an official release from Blizzard?
0
Basically the only thing we know so far is that not all skills will go to level 20, there are skills with maximum rank of 1, 5, 10 and 20. Because of this we assume that there will not be a synergy system this time because it would be weird that a rank 1 skill can synergize with a rank 20 one. I personally think that it will work pretty much like the Wow talent system.
0
I'm pretty sure that there was Starcraft 2 in blizzcon 2007 so the record sales are all because of diablo 3.
0
"As of August 29, 2001, Diablo II has sold 4 million copies worldwide"
"To date, the franchise has sold more than 18.5 million copies worldwide."
If you discount the 2.5 million from D1 then D2 sold around 16 million. So there's at least 16 million fans and you also have to factor there's a lot of people who share their copy of the game with their siblings/friends AND people who download the game through torrents or whatever.
0
0
0
0
Well I think that even if it's a little conflicting with the lore we could find a way around it. Also necromancers wont be returning and probably paladins too so there's no problem there.
Well I still think that you should be able to finish the random sidequests in more than one way to keep you from being the good errand boy so maybe Ill give it more thought and some other time make a new thread with the balance, order and chaos concept instead.
0
That could be an awesome random sidequest lol.
I like it, specially the red eyes thing, it would look fucking cool. Don't know about neutral being better than the other 2 though.
Again, please read the thread before you make yourself look more of an idiot. The concept of alignment doesn't have anything to do with siding with one faction or another.
Oh that sounds like an great alternative, even better than good and evil considering that some people are getting way too confused by the concept of alignment. We should also have "balanced" instead of "neutral" to get rid of all misinterpretations. Im not sure how the change in appeareance could be done though, maybe just forfeit it?
0
Read the thread before posting, we've suggested many ways in which alignment can affect your gameplay. Also there is no absolute good in this game, what are you talking about? Angels and demons want to destroy Sanctuary so they are both bad guys for mankind.
0
I bought warcraft 3 because of Dota.
If they sold it separately only a few people would buy it and the rest would download it. Also Blizzard would get a lot of hate for not including it with D3.