• 0

    posted a message on Medievaldragon - Farewell
    Looks like he is at diii.net now, just read a fantastic review of D3 from him.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard Offended Me
    Quote from name="Elfen Lied" »
    About the SCII split, did they actually say the would be sold as separate discs?

    Red Alert 2 has two campaigns, Allied Faction and Union Faction, and has a disc for each side, but was sold as a single game.

    Why couldn't SCII follow the same suit? 3 discs, one for each campaign but they are packaged together when you buy the game.

    I do not recall them saying they would be selling them as separate discs with 3 separate campaigns on them.

    I have nothing against splitting up campaign/single player story mode onto more than one disc, I do have an issue with buying them as separate games almost, that seems over the top.

    Yep, three campaigns, three games. Each will be sold separately and apart. I'm assuming 2-3 months in between each game.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on To all who have played D3...
    I hope that unique axe was just a placeholder, hehe.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard Offended Me
    Quote from "Daemaro" »
    Hopefully those features they are talking about is just things like realm change, name change, sex change, maybe respec Nothing major and nothing month by month. I hope to god.

    That's what I got from it when they said microtransactions. But even if they did make it P2P, I will be their first customer.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Pay to Play D3?
    Quote from "russianKd"" »
    O come on dude, what kind of content would they add to Diablo 3 that would require a monthly fee?? Expansions are another story, we pay once to buy them. The only fee that people might have to pay is for some features that will be in the new battle.net, thats it!
    Paying to play in co-op mode with 3 other people is a rip off. Think of it as Diablo 2 with way better graphics, differnt classes( some), different story.. Nothing really changed in terms of playing online: Co-op mode with even less people, maybe its for the better, and chat and stuff like that.

    Who said a monthly fee? I sure as hell didn't. I just said a simple fee. It could be for ANYTHING. Maybe it's guild related? Maybe it's for more storage space. Maybe it's for just more additional content for weapons, items, runes, or anything else that the devs have to start from scratch. These things cost money. And personally, a small fee isn't that bad and it goes a long way. They did say microtransactions and that word 'micro' seems awfully small to me :D.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Diablo 3 Next Classes theory
    For some reason I think the "Light" class would be the most anticipated since people just love their Paladins. Now, I'm not saying that there will be a "Light" class but if there was, it will be the last class to be revealed for hype purposes.
    Posted in: Unannounced Class
  • 0

    posted a message on average game for D2 1.2 players - JW IS WRONG
    Quote from "Lestater" »
    You actually just validated his point, that everyone is playing by themselves, which isn't that what mfing is?

    True, but JW said it was for a different reason.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Pay to Play D3?
    Quote from "russianKd"" »
    This dude is right. Its kinda lame to p2p for a game you bought and especially a Diablo game, which isnt like WoW where a monthly fee is needed to keep the servers going and adding content and etc. But they said Diablo 3 will be co-op with 4 players per game.. I'm not going to pay a monthly fee for that, it's not worth it.
    They make so much freaking money with WoW.. I would buy it but only for single player if it is actually P2P.

    Who says that Blizzard won't add new content and areas? Maybe they will release TWO expansion packs because of the extra revenue.

    That sounds like a good idea to me. And since D3 isn't an MMO, and $15 is usually the price for playing one, I think Diablo 3 will have maybe $5 MAX for some fee.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Anyone other than me thinks the Firebat and Frog Plauge spells for WD is awesome?
    Both are awesome.

    And in before a mod merges this thread.
    Posted in: Witch Doctor: The Mbwiru Eikura
  • 0

    posted a message on Blizzard on Battle.net Subscription
    Quote from "angelmaz" »
    This was a fantastic post. Nice job man

    Just because you agree with him doesn't make it a good post. Blizzard is a business first and foremost and they are here to get ahead in their industry, albeit they are dominating it.

    But again, no one is forcing anyone to buy the game. If you don't want to play for a small fee or other micro transactions, you have the choice not to do so. Bitching about it on a forum isn't going to change anything at all.
    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on 4 Players Per game?
    Quote from "Kenelm" »
    And D3 will join those if the player limit is 4.


    Those are fightin' words, brotha :mad:.









    :D.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Pay to Play D3?
    Quote from "Ent1ty" »
    wow so much diversity..its split as far as i can see and frankly i wouldn't mind paying 15 bucks a month or 60 bucks a year.. i can't get a job but i can surley get money whenever i want and hey if it makes those hackers fly away then im all for it

    100% agree. When I played D2, hacks completely ruined my experience... Back in the day when Ethereal "Ith" swords were around and duped items up the ass ever... F that... I will pay whatever the fee Blizzard asks, because their games are that good.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Starcraft 2 Trilogy
    Quote from "Ent1ty" »
    the first part of SCII seems done almost and diablo 3 is well on its way especially since its been in the making since 06...i have no doubts sc will be released in the first half and diablo three late 09 to early 2010

    Whether it's done or not is completely irrelevant. It's called hype and marketing. That's like Toyota announcing two brand new cars that will have 120 MPG mileage and they release it six months apart. Wtf would be the benefit from tihs? That's right NOTHING.

    They want the MOST they can sell out of both of these games. It's safe to say that if S2 and D3 were released six months apart, not everyone will buy both games, whereas the likeliness of them buying both increases dramatically if the games were farther apart.


    Get it now?
    Posted in: Starcraft & SC2
  • 0

    posted a message on 4 Players Per game?
    Quote from "Kenelm" »
    Actually, I always thought Diablo III would get like 16-20 players online at the same time. I mean, come on, it's 2008! Hellgate, up to 5 last time I checked, Titan Quest, up to 6, Sacred 2, up to 16, NWN2, up to 100...

    But all of those games suck.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on More to the Rune System???
    Quote from "blizter" »
    Err, Minor, normal, perfect blabla etc. Who said unique and stuff lol

    No one, I was just guessing haha. But yeah, your way makes perfect sense since we've already seen "minor" runes in D3 gameplay...

    And Jay said there would be 6-7 different runes. We've almost seen them all. Power, Striking, Multi-strike, Lethality....HMMM :D!!
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.