DiabloFans

Awesome! Boubouille is *exactly* what this site needs, s long as he isn't spreading himself too thin.

/me is so excited.

Quote from Aerisot

I'm hoping we get Azmodan taking over Tyreal making the new form of Azreal.

Its too cliche if all 5 of the lesser evils rejoin Diablo's side after banishing him.

Remember, the Primes wanted the banishment...the Lessers just didn't know at the time.
http://diablo.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_Exile#The_Masterplan_Revealed

When you unknowing do exactly what your master wants, it makes sense to come crawling back into the fold telling him how awesome he is for tricking you and pulling off such a masterful plan.

Quote from Moxx

It's Fetlock, as seen here:
http://diablo3dungeo...ait_Fetlock.png

And Fetlock, as you know, is the codename for Azmodan.

and what does that mean man? don't let it hang there @_@;

Sorry, didn't think I left anyone hanging.

Since DiabloFans doesn't take their spoiler stuff seriously (as demonstrated by their last cast), here's the breakdown:

So the guy in the still (and therefore the video it's from) is Azmodan:
http://diablo.wikia.com/wiki/Azmodan

He's one of the 2 Lesser Evils that took charge of the Burning Hells after the Prime Evils (Diablo, etc) were banished to Sanctuary. Since the video takes place on Sanctuary, it shows that Azmodan (and probably Belial too) have come to Sanctuary.

Assuming the Prime Evils are still here somewhere, that would bring the list of epic super-powerful demons that are on Sanctuary to: Diablo, Mephisto, Baal, Azmodan, and Belial
...at least.

This lines up with the data-mined speculation that Belial is a boss in Act 2 (codenamed Saddle) and that Azmodan is a boss in Act 3 (codenamed Fetlock).

Ask..and more can be covered.

It's Fetlock, as seen here:
http://diablo3dungeon.com/uiimage/Portrait_Fetlock.png

And Fetlock, as you know, is the codename for Azmodan.

Quote from PhrozenDragon

Quote from swooshxx

You were the correct one PhrozenDragon, it was distasteful and immature for Sixen (or whoever) to post a spoiler into the TITLE of a NEWS article. Even if it is speculation, I can not think of a reputable site that would do something this retarded.

Well that's not why I opposed it. It's not a spoiler, it's speculation, and I opposed it because I'm not sure it would give the correct picture of the content of the cast. Though I couldn't come with anything better at the time.

There were some spoilers in there though that probably do tell what will happen in parts of the game, but those weren't in the title.

I know you're really into lore, and as such, really don't understand the impact of a 'spoiler', so let me help you with an analogy:
Your best friend is looking in your Mom's purse for cigarettes one day, and comes across a random car key. It's not on your Mom's key chain, but instead, is the only key on a ring with a car dealership advertisement on it. He looks and realizes that the make of the car it belongs to does not match anything that you family drives.
Being your best friend, he realizes also that your 16th birthday is next week.

There's several different things that could explain this, but the "you're getting a new car for your birthday" explanation seems most plausible.

^ pure "speculation"
Would he "spoil" your new car gift by telling you about his speculation? Any reasonable person would say YES.

You followed the above almost to the letter. You were looking around where you weren't meant to be, found some information and/or concept art that lead to a plausible conclusion, and you posted "Diablo's a Girl" as fact -- there's no "maybe" in there, no "possibly", no "could be" -- IS A GIRL.

You think the Cast fixes this? You hid the fact that this was speculation **behind a spoiler alert**. So assuming someone doesn't want to have spoilers...follow me here:
- You post a definitive statement as the unavoidable TITLE in a NEWS post.
- You hide the explanation that it is only speculation behind a spoiler tag in a video.

^ how the hell do you expect people who avoid spoilers to do anything but accept that Diablo has now been announced to be a girl? Do you see the problem here?

Not only was it spoiled for them, but they also believe it more than the speculators do (they don't know it's speculation).
I agree, that's ironic and quite funny. Still doesn't give you the excuse to use content behind spoilers tags as the titles for your news posts. I'll let me first post stand -- you are all infantile and should have you "official fan site" status stripped for incompetence.

Quote from PhrozenDragon

Quote from OmniNom

Is no one else curious about the title? D:

I fought long and hard, and although it was a bloody battle I eventually lost out in what title to pick.

You are right however, the title is a reference to the popular lore theory that Leah will somehow be possessed by Diablo. We talk about it during the cast.

You were the correct one PhrozenDragon, it was distasteful and immature for Sixen (or whoever) to post a spoiler into the TITLE of a NEWS article. Even if it is speculation, I can not think of a reputable site that would do something this retarded.

This site has rarely been 'on the ball' with news, and I accepted that because you filtered out the garbage (that takes time) -- but if this is your new attitude towards being a Fan Site, then you have lost any respect or trust I had. Good luck being just another rumor site...

Please note that the online item database is pulled directly from the game files (yeah, cool huh?), so the existence of unattuned runes only suggests that the build they are playing with has the item in it, not that they are being used or plan to use them. It does not mean: "The presence of unattuned runes on the item page seemed to suggest that the team was going ahead with the implementation of the system".

It's like taking a look at a beta and seeing a feedback button on all the new features and concluding, "Oh, this feedback button must be a part of the application when it's released!"

Gallery link:
http://www.diablofans.com/gallery/image/3351-oct-1st-diablo-iii-beta-entry/

Oh...thought you stopped doing these since it'd been a full week since the Demon Hunter one. Should we expect only one each week?
(note also that the demon hunter one is out-of-date since the resource system was mostly redone, and links a Barbarian playthrough at the end :/ )

Thanks for all the content on the youtube channel though -- the play-throughs were very awesome and appreciated.

Yes, we all saw this 2 weeks ago. Please just remove Sixen's post rights, so we can get this show on the road.