I don't play wow and never have, I have played every diablo and read the books and I don't seem to think diablo 3's art direction is bad, but I guess I am not a "true" fan because I like what they are doing with diablo 3 along with many many other people. There may be alot of people who dont like what they are doing, but there is alot of people who do that are original diablo players whether you call them true fans or not, they helped make diablo the most succesfull hack and slash of all time and deserve just as much say as any of you.
Oh is that what you think there reasoning behind not changing the art direction is? Money?
They tried a darker diablo 3 and it just did not work, they gave various other reasons and explained why they went the direction they did. Bring something smart to the table, something they have not already tried and they might just listen to you.
(and i bet you buy "wowish" diablo 3 and play the shit out of it)
They already said they weren't going to change the coloring, and gave reasons as to why they feel this is the right direction for diablo 3. I do not mind that pic but i definitely don't agree that it should be that grey, to me everything looks grey and desaturated.
I think he said he cant go to blizzcon, he will just wait for the announcements and he has nothing else to do since he recently moved?!? not sure about the last part!
If they just limited it to the Sorceress ( I'm talking about Diablo II) and never put it on Enigma for every other character, immunes would act as the equilizer, thus the need for the Sorceress for speed and various other characters for fire power in fighting immunes.
It would not be fair at all to take it away- casting classes always have next to no health, very low defense, etc., while other classes get to have high health, defense, etc. Teleport adds the extra speed the sorceress needs to act as the ranged-attacker she was meant to be. Giving it to everyone else was not fair by any means- they got along fine before the introduction of Enigma.
Yeah i agree, if you took it away from the magic user in d3 it would give them a pretty big disadvantage.
Personally, Art Direction is the least of issues if any in Diablo 3. I will rather have them focus on gameplay, trading, itemization, boss events, stash and stuff that helps move items from alt-character to alt-character smoothly than mere art direction.
Art direction takes a helluva time -- which translates in game development going beyond 2011. No thanks. Shove the petition.
0
0
Oh is that what you think there reasoning behind not changing the art direction is? Money?
They tried a darker diablo 3 and it just did not work, they gave various other reasons and explained why they went the direction they did. Bring something smart to the table, something they have not already tried and they might just listen to you.
(and i bet you buy "wowish" diablo 3 and play the shit out of it)
0
0
0
Even if they do have an idea, there is always the chance of unexpected setbacks and blizzard is known for understanding that all too well
0
0
I agree, metals for names has come from a few other games already and would just look weird in diablo imo
0
Count me in :thumbsup:
0
0
Yeah it has, but still hes not going to be able to answer a large portion of these questions.
0
Yeah i agree, if you took it away from the magic user in d3 it would give them a pretty big disadvantage.
0
I agree, it would be worth the wait if there was more than enough gameplay/lore per act
0
0
0
If Blizzard puts this in the game im sure they will make it puzzles worthy of diablo 3 :thumbsup:
and btw very cool sig