- TheBuzzSaw
- Registered User
-
Member for 15 years, 9 months, and 24 days
Last active Fri, Oct, 7 2011 16:25:27
- 1 Follower
- 228 Total Posts
- 1 Thank
-
Oct 7, 2009TheBuzzSaw posted a message on Is It Too Early to Pre-Order?Yeah, I'll pre-order when Blizzard posts a release date and no one else. I've been through this countless times with other games. Never ever trust retailers/vendors. They just want your money. They don't know squat about the game's release.Posted in: News
-
Aug 26, 2009TheBuzzSaw posted a message on Why Jay Wilson Lets His Daughter Play Diablo 3.Posted in: NewsQuote from "SNowfreak" »Overall he sounds very respectable and nice. I agree with what he says and how he parents is his own business of course, but personally i don't see how FPS's or even "any game with guns in it" is worse than diablo. I think GTA is a different story, but shooters in general aren't that bad, except for a few.
I believe he is referring to the fact that most FPS games have more direct connections to reality. Even though Diablo might be more violent/gory than a typical FPS, killing monsters in a completely fictional universe using completely fictional means has less likelihood to affect someone than a game featuring a gangster shooting people on the streets of New York (a real weapon killing "familiar" people in a real city). Granted, different people are affected in different ways, but I find his point valid. -
Aug 26, 2009TheBuzzSaw posted a message on Why Jay Wilson Lets His Daughter Play Diablo 3.Epic! Thank you so much, Blizzard! My wife and I were concerned with the extreme amount of bloody/gory explosion going on with every death. I love Diablo a ton, but I'd rather not have so much blood going everywhere. I have a kid too, but that is only a secondary excuse. I don't like exposing myself to so much excess gore. I much appreciate the ability to tone the game down. I am more about the story and gameplay anyway.Posted in: News
-
Mar 4, 2009TheBuzzSaw posted a message on Tell Blizzard Your #1 Diablo II Patch Note.New sets would make me very happy.Posted in: News
Nerfed rune words would be nice. -
Mar 4, 2009TheBuzzSaw posted a message on Bashiok on Runes.I wish the D2 gems actually scaled properly. They did not do nearly enough damage by the time Nightmare/Hell rolled around. It was high runes or bust.Posted in: News
-
Mar 3, 2009TheBuzzSaw posted a message on Tell Blizzard Your #1 Diablo II Patch Note.I want a patch to let me play the game without having the CD in the tray... Oh wait, they already did that.Posted in: News
Nothing. I'm good. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
LOL! At least Diablo 3 will be fun by itself. I won't be buying SC2 anymore. The whole point of buying that game was to have LAN parties with friends.
0
This is like selling a car without wheels. It just defeats the point of buying it.
0
The Internet is not perfectly connected to the entire planet. Where I live, slow/dropped connections are fairly common. Plus, I just prefer playing with friends in the same room. There is absolutely no good reason that our computers should have to connect to the Internet just to play with people in the same room. My friends and I all pay for our own copies, so we don't deserve be babysat/authenticated either.
I have absolutely no ill will toward Battle.net. It's a great service, but the addition of LAN play will not harm that community.
0
0
0
0
Nerfed rune words would be nice.
0
0
Nothing. I'm good.
0
"Hey, man. I'll trade you my Uber Windforce for 38 town portals."
We'll also start seeing common game names: "brg tp x8"
LOLOLOLOL
0
A town portal should take 4 seconds to cast and cost 1,000,000 gold.
0
0
0
0
Removing LAN play will not reduce cheating. Closed Battle.net was a radically different architecture than LAN play servers were. In a LAN game, the "server" trusts the clients with data. On closed Battle.net, virtually all important information is stored server-side. Regardless, people found ways to break in. Packet-sniffing is a pretty straightforward method.
I had LAN parties with tons of my friends over the lifespan of Diablo 2. It is not the same experience as creating a private channel in Battle.net. Personally, I prefer LAN play over online play. With LAN play, I am immune to the Internet failing (which it does often in my area), my group never has lag (or lag spikes), and we can all use our single-player characters we worked so hard to build up. It was also a positive experience for the friends of mine who owned Diablo 2 but had no Internet access at home (yes, there are people in this world who either have no Internet or still have dial-up).
Blizzard is making the right choice by making Battle.net a much more inviting place. The changes they have announced make me feel better about playing with strangers online. I disagree with the decision to remove LAN play, but I'll live (given the changes to B.net). Accurate statistics about how many people actually use LAN play are virtually impossible to gather since it does not happen online. However, it is incredibly naive to assume that "no one plays over LAN" or "all LAN-lovers are cheaters/hackers/pirates/etc.". I've lived in several states and have always been able to locate Diabo 2 LAN parties; none of them ever condoned cheating. The reason many people believe that LAN players are hackers is the vocal group of hackers on the Internet who did use the LAN play to learn something about the multiplayer protocol. The rest of them were silent, just playing the game offline.