wth, pregnant witch doctor...
thank god the 3d model is not
-
- Skaarj
- Registered User
-
Member for 15 years, 9 months, and 20 days
Last active Mon, Aug, 24 2009 13:36:49
- 0 Followers
- 311 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
-
Nov 26, 2008Skaarj posted a message on Blizzcast #6 - Diablo III Senior Artist & New Monster ArtPosted in: News
-
Aug 24, 2008Skaarj posted a message on Jay Wilson Interview for www.grytv.plPosted in: News
wth!? you also dont have limited time to reach the end of the gameQuote from "radiant_knight" »i don't have hours to play at a time.
the acts better be reasonable like in Diablo 2. -
Aug 18, 2008Skaarj posted a message on Bill Roper Shares Diablo III Thoughtsi dont get what so awesome with the wall of zombiesPosted in: News
its very cool concept, but it looked very cheap (zombies attacking the air) -
Aug 10, 2008Skaarj posted a message on Diablo 3 Items and InventoryPosted in: News
you can add more space to the old inventory system just as easily, and the biggest con imo is how items look tiny and boringQuote from "EtheriChaos" »In a logical sense, yes it would make more sense that items of larger size would take up more inventory space. No, it does not make logical sense that someone could fit an item like a halberd in a back pack. . . At all. Making the game less convenient for the sake of some sense of realism is a bit odd to me. The new inventory/bag setup will make it where you can carry more items, meaning less town trips, meaning more gold per trip that can be earned. Everything about the new system is pro pro pro. The only con to it is people arguing that it's too wow like or it's unrealistic. Hey, if I wanted it to be realistic, I'd go play a video game where I'm not gunning down hordes of demons with fireballs. I want the game to be fun and with as little down time as possible. All this fear mongering about it being like wow is just ridiculous. -
Aug 8, 2008Skaarj posted a message on Diablo 3 Art Director ResignsPosted in: News
will armor shrink to their normal and reasonable size as the game progresses, along with stone statues getting to look more serious and mean? will the color actually make some sense as the game progresses unlike the green in tristram cathedral?Quote from "rblittle" »Here is the deal, all of you fanboys will get pissed but oh freakin well, i have played the diablo franchise since 6 months after the first one came out, and i know a bit about the development of video game, so i can thoroughly say that many things in the game are destined to change, however......
!!!!HIS QUITTING HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FANBOY PETITIONS THAT SOME OF YOU THOUGHT WOULD MAKE A POINT!!!!!!!!!
Here's an idea, unless you want to sign up and program and code this game into completion or help with the Art Direction, hows about you Shut your pie hole?
I happen to know that the lighting of this game was done bright in the beginning to give the game depth. That way when evil is let loose it REALLY has a effect, plus this game is starting in daylight, the others began at night.
Maybe we should all wait for more than the first maps to be created before we criticize.
the petition also points these thing out, its not that simple
i thought fanboys are people who belive blindless in game comapanies if they were some almighty god
i think blizzard is just a bunch of talented humans that can take some advice sometimes - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
edit: lol, a mod was faster than me and deleted the post i was comenting on
0
and huge pauldrons (along with all cartoon inherit of exagerated proportion) are in games other than wow, warhammer for example. If wow didnt exist i would still think disproprortionality sucks bad
0
waht bugs me is blizzard "strong sillhouets" philosophy if this means shoulderpads that protect not just your shoulders but your head and arms with the cost of being HUGE (cartoonish)
hunter wolf, i was eagerly waitng for your reply to my postcan you tell me why you are not responding?
Parkinsons disease!!! i was trying to remeber that name
i dunno, he looks weaker than the the necor did back then, but that may be just me
0
0
that barb up there is awsome imo, im not so very happy with the wd thou. he looks so physically weak, i dont like hes pose , dunno
0
0
and for the most part of your last big post and no this one, its clearly all about YOUR opinion, and i will respect
i for instance and many other think improvements on graphics are improvment overall, and they can be turned off you dislike
to me realistic=interestingness
0
as for blizzard knowing waht they are doing and our "whining" being imature...
we all have been waiting long for diablo 3, and im very happy for its announcment, but i am part of the audience, it is WE who gives money for their work, without us, blizzard would be absolutely nothing, as every other commercial company. And you say we know nothing about what we WANT? you say constructive critism is immaturity? they have the choice to not hear us, but our satisfaction is their guarantee of money, if a considerable number of people are complaining about one thing, i think thats a sing something is wrong
now, im propably going to buy D3 (though i felt the same for UT3) but we have the gift of communication for christ sake, COMMUNICATION. If they are going to have my money, i want to every single cent to worth it
We are just expressing our opinion for our own satisfaction, other people have all the right to disagree
the same thing happened to SC2 and the graphics/art improvement are obvious, how can you denie that?
and admit it calling everyone 15 years old suicidal emo girl is NOT imaturity? im expecting you to be more respectful form now on and to be sorry for that
0
just wondering what do you mean by saying it wont just be light medium heavy?
i know the armor in diablo 2 were categorized as that, but that 100% irrelevant anyway........
0
they WERE doing sc2 all bright and clean, the fans disliked, voiced their opinion
and now blizz is improving the graphics, and im really impressed with the result
if only i had the links to the images comparision
0
new runewords
new places
new items
0
0
is this arguement ever gonna die?
we want diablo to look like diablo simple as that
diablo 2 is not perfect(as any other game out there), thats where diablo 3 must focus
thats teh meaning of sequels, diablo 2 and 1 were great games, thats why they are making a third, but some of us are unhappy with the way blizzard took
no one wants to play dialbo 2 again, that would imply in 2d graphics, dupes, borked systems like chat, inventory... and things like that
we want a true sequel, and this does imply in evolvment
0
0