Quote fromAre the 5 classes final or will there be more classes to choose from?
I can answer this one :D! Classes and number of them is undecided.
-
- TychusFindlay
- Registered User
-
Member for 15 years, 9 months, and 22 days
Last active Thu, Mar, 26 2009 11:47:12
- 1 Follower
- 437 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
0
0
0
0
I love your signature, topic creator
0
0
Have you played ANY other games that use DirectX 9.0, but only use DirectX 8.1 features? Almost ALL games from 2002-2004 that used these features looked like that. It's in the engine, and the choice for system requirements, more than the art style choice.
0
If you play only on one side (Factions: Horde/Alliance) you are getting only about half of the game. Add to that different paths; different characters; getting items; just exploring the world. I would say it has as much, or more replay value than Diablo 2. You, sir, probably have never played WoW. EDIT: I KNOW you haven't played it enough to know what you're talking about.. Or else, you're a hypocrite. I, myself, have only spent casual time playing it (On free private servers.), and I STILL know more than you about the game. Try giving a game a chance before you bash it in your ignorance. That being said; I'm not a WarCraft fanboy. WarCraft 3 was a horrible disappointment compared to StarCraft for me. So, don't start with that B.S., which I know you were going to do.
--- Johnny.. What are we gonna do with you? The change in StarCraft 2 was negligible. The only people that were satisfied with it were the ones that only partially thought that the game was too "Wow-ish". The people who were most vocal about it were never satisfied with the change. I should know; I frequent all major StarCraft 2 forums. It was very negligible, and was even less of a change than the "How It Should Look Like" pictures that plague this site.
0
WTF? Play Single-player ... Or just work your way up to being the first level 100/99 with the best items
0
WTF? Play Single-player ... Or just work your way up to being the first level 100/99 with the best items
0
-- Also, by looking at the two monsters, and the other monsters in the game, I have come to the conclusion that "Seige Beast" is more likely a class of beasts. Rather than an individual monster.
0
I agree. Doing the same dungeons at the later levels (90+) shouldn't be the same dungeon I did at level 60, in my opinion. That gets old especially considering how long it takes to raise those levels.
0
Did you PLAY patch v1.10?
True. I had no problem with grinding the first couple times I played the game until about level 80-85, and that was with 1-3 players. Now, I have a hard time staying focused 40-60 with 8 players
That's good. Just because you don't plow through the monsters, and never stop unless your stamina gets low doesn't mean it isn't as fast paced. Fast paced, to me, doesn't just mean how fast I get through a level; to me it means keeping the adrenaline going, and the interest. So, since they seem to want to be adding strategy, and actual skill the game, I think that'll be so much more for the better. And, definately not "slow paced".
0
0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
0