The bird isn't a "penguin" at all. It's a condor. Condor = Blizzard North.
Blizzard North = Diablo creators, Diablo creators = Diablo 3, Diablo 3 = 10/10 IGN 10/10 PC Gamers, voted most epic game in history of computer games.
We have a thread winner guys, and it's me.
Thanks
/Win
That actually make sense
Except: Diablo creators( those who left)= Hellgate:london
I think everybody here would love to see Diablo 3 Tomorrow... Lets hope thats what we are going to see
No.. It's really not .. From now on evertime you post I'm gonna put FINAL FANTASY XI in big red letters so that hopefully you reply to them.
FINAL FANTASY XI
IX YSATNAF LANIF
Quote from "skeaser" »
No mine is telling you to shut up, which would do us all a favor.
Your posts are babble that serve no purpose other than to prove you have the IQ of mayonnaise. Either you are entirely stupid enough that breathing should be considered a modern miracle or you really suck at getting thoughts across in written form.
Its simply an observation that the picture that _BLIZZARD_ provided us with maybe be throwing us in the wrong direction as they've been known to do in the past. And yes, after Blizzard North's disassembly many of its employees were retained and moved to Irvine supposedly because the project they presented to Blizzard was subpar. This is also, supposedly, why Bill Roper and many other project leads left the company.
I don't know, looks a hell of a lot more like a condor than a penguin to me...
.... Have you ever heard of Final Fantasy XI.. You are pwned.. Get over it, and please leave if this is all you're going to contribute... And, YES THEY CAN!! If they really wanted to, they could make Diablo 3 an MMO.
Final fantasy XI? Is final fantasy those games that have absolutely no link between them whatsoever?
No but WoW does continue the WC3 storyline...therefore...stay with me here...it could be considered a sequel.
2 a: subsequent development b: the next installment (as of a speech or story); especially: a literary, cinematic, or televised work continuing the course of a story begun in a preceding one
Also, big red letters don't make you right, they only make you an asshat.
Im going to repeat: Is WoW named Warcraft 4? No.
That mean: MMorpg diablo can't be named Diablo 3. Therefore, IF they make a Diablo mmorpg they are going to call it World of diablo or something similar because they can't call it Diablo 3
[Edit] Found a previous post of mine. May help you understand
Let me resume. You make an apple from your apple tree. You give it to somebody, he like it. Then you get another apple from your apple tree and you give it to somebody else. He like it too. Then, you get an orange (from your apple tree) and you paint it in red so people believe its an apple.
See? Do you understand what that mean? That mean Diablo 3 will NEVER be a mmorpg since Diablo1 and diablo2 wasnt. Making a MMORPG Diablo3 would force Blizzard to rename it.
It cannot be Diablo 3 if its a mmorpg
If they want to make Diablo3 it will have to be an apple, not a painted orange
Diablo 3 can't be a mmorpg neither a pay-to-play game. HERES WHY
Diablo 1 and 2 werent mmorpgs neither were they had monthly fees. Diablo 3 is a sequel which mean is supposed to look alike ( not identical). Making a mmorpg as a sequel to a Isometric ARPG would be completely stupid with a little touch of non-sense.
That mean: IF they make a mmorpg (which seem they are) IT CAN'T BE A DIABLO SEQUEL NAMED DIABLO 3
Diablo 3 can't be a mmorpg neither a pay-to-play game. HERES WHY
Diablo 1 and 2 werent mmorpgs neither were they had monthly fees. Diablo 3 is a sequel which mean is supposed to look alike ( not identical). Making a mmorpg as a sequel to a Isometric ARPG would be completely stupid with a little touch of non-sense.
That mean: IF they make a mmorpg (which seem they are) IT CAN'T BE A DIABLO SEQUEL
0
Dont even try to deny that the Diablo 3 models have at least 2x more poly
0
Ill include a Diablo3 wallpaper i edited slighlt ( to remove the enter button)
enjoy
0
0
That actually make sense
Except: Diablo creators( those who left)= Hellgate:london
I think everybody here would love to see Diablo 3 Tomorrow... Lets hope thats what we are going to see
0
I love you btw ♥:cute:
0
0
I love your humor:D^_^
0
Nice observation
0
What is that crappy edit of Diablo foot with the penguin?
0
0
0
0
Im going to repeat: Is WoW named Warcraft 4? No.
That mean: MMorpg diablo can't be named Diablo 3. Therefore, IF they make a Diablo mmorpg they are going to call it World of diablo or something similar because they can't call it Diablo 3
[Edit] Found a previous post of mine. May help you understand
Let me resume. You make an apple from your apple tree. You give it to somebody, he like it. Then you get another apple from your apple tree and you give it to somebody else. He like it too. Then, you get an orange (from your apple tree) and you paint it in red so people believe its an apple.
See? Do you understand what that mean? That mean Diablo 3 will NEVER be a mmorpg since Diablo1 and diablo2 wasnt. Making a MMORPG Diablo3 would force Blizzard to rename it.
It cannot be Diablo 3 if its a mmorpg
If they want to make Diablo3 it will have to be an apple, not a painted orange
0
Diablo 3 can't be a mmorpg neither a pay-to-play game. HERES WHY
Diablo 1 and 2 werent mmorpgs neither were they had monthly fees. Diablo 3 is a sequel which mean is supposed to look alike ( not identical). Making a mmorpg as a sequel to a Isometric ARPG would be completely stupid with a little touch of non-sense.
That mean: IF they make a mmorpg (which seem they are) IT CAN'T BE A DIABLO SEQUEL NAMED DIABLO 3
How many times have i wrote that... 10? 20?
Also: WoW != Warcraft 4
0
Diablo 1 and 2 werent mmorpgs neither were they had monthly fees. Diablo 3 is a sequel which mean is supposed to look alike ( not identical). Making a mmorpg as a sequel to a Isometric ARPG would be completely stupid with a little touch of non-sense.
That mean: IF they make a mmorpg (which seem they are) IT CAN'T BE A DIABLO SEQUEL
How many times have i wrote that... 10? 20?
Also: WoW != Warcraft 4