- Dimebog
- Registered User
-
Member for 15 years, 9 months, and 29 days
Last active Sun, Sep, 13 2015 14:39:03
- 4 Followers
- 2,004 Total Posts
- 32 Thanks
-
Jul 28, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Bashiok on "Encouraging People to Play Together"Can't some mod just pin an explanation that Bashiok does not frequent or post here? People are confusing the blues tracker as an actual part of this forum.Posted in: News
-
Jul 21, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Patch 1.13 PTR Forum is Up - Don't Get Excited, ThoughThe "Blue Tracker" should be updated to track those forums.Posted in: News
-
Jul 15, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Bashiok on "Encouraging People to Play Together"That doesn't really make sense. Drops are rolled individually, meaning that MF would affect your drops individually regardless of the killing blow, or whatever. That is the whole point, isn't it?Posted in: News
-
Jul 13, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Bashiok on "Encouraging People to Play Together"Posted in: News
It's simple. If a full game scales to a point where every player needs to participate in the fight in order to be able to even kill a boss (as it damn should be), then there can't be any "leeching".Quote from "Musica" »Awww, I was hoping they'd find a way to get rid of leeches but I guess that's not gonna happen. I don't really know what I think of all this. Is Blizzard sort of covering their butts? Is there any effective way where they could've gotten rid of leeches? Well, whatever. I'll be playing single player mostly anyway probably since I doubt I'll be able to compete with all those players with godly gear and whatnot.
If each player in a party has to damage each and every one in the group of 20 monsters which could easily die when only two of the players in the game use their AoE abilities on them, then it becomes a game of tag.Quote from "Musica" »Still, is it that hard for a player to just damage a monster to get experience from it? I mean come on. Even if you're only inflicting a little damage with your more experienced teammates finishing the monstor off, at least it encourages some kind of contribution on your part to the battle. Of course, I don't even understand why anyone would want to leech. What's the fun of just standing around and reaping experience? It just seems like such a waste of time and life.
Are you even listening to yourself? YOU GET YOUR OWN DROPS. YOU CAN'T GET "EVERYTHING".Quote from "Zhar" »Hmm, only thing that worries me is that the whole "drop range" may encourage players to rush ahead of the group to kill everything, so that they get the majority of the drops.
May not be doing much good for teamwork... -
Jul 10, 2009Dimebog posted a message on A bit of cool info about loot systemBless you, you actually think that information is new. It's only been discussed for a bit less than a year now.Posted in: News
-
Jun 9, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Battle.net Fee Conspiracies No More?And part for being fast on deleting excellent on-topic posts that disagree with your personal opinion, you are not really doing your job tracking the news, got it.Posted in: News
EDIT: Feast your eyes:
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/10/13/blizzcon-2008-rob-pardo-talks-battle-net-monetizing/
The original full interview (which I can't find now) is from October '08. Thanks to the idiot who gave me negative rep because of "bluffing". Maybe you will learn to check on news in the future before mod-trolling people who know more than you do. -
Jun 8, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Battle.net Fee Conspiracies No More?Posted in: News
I don't stash hundreds of links just to be able to "prove" something to people who don't follow the news. Two people told you that already, what more do you need? Look for it yourself...Quote from "Seth" »Do you have tangible evidence to support that claim, links, and quotes?
It's something that has been posted on DFans at one point or another anyway - I get all my news here. So you should know. -
Jun 7, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Battle.net Fee Conspiracies No More?Posted in: News
You are wrong, he is right.Quote from "Magistrate" »No. It was hinted at in several reports vaguely mentioning that fees *might* only apply to small things like name changes or such. It was not confirmed, however, the status of a Battle.net fee for normal use. That is why it's been reported all over the place. -
Jun 5, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Battle.net Fee Conspiracies No More?Posted in: News
The "definitive declaration" that D3 will be 100% free and that there will be no premium services or microtransactions for additional content has been spoken by the Blizzard CEO relatively long ago.Quote from "Magistrate" »Could this be a definitive declaration that Battle.net will be free for Diablo III as well? Would players be willing to pay for extended services if they are implemented? Does this increase the appeal of buying and playing Diablo III on Battle.net for fans?
That was newsworthy, this is speculation. -
Jun 4, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Bashiok on Rune Swapping.There will be no such thing as "premium users".Posted in: News
Get your facts straight. -
Jun 3, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Bashiok on Rune Swapping.Posted in: News
Yeah, if there were only ten or so high runes on the realm (due to no duping), I'm sure those ten runes would make a fine currency!Quote from "BryanM" »Hahaha, the guy thinks duping was the reason single slot, useful items became the currency in Diablo 2. Ridiculous.
All the duping did was drive up inflation, runes would always be the currency for LoD, as the SoJ used to be in the base game. They were basically designed to be.
Don't be an idiot... Try to understand what he said, instead of assuming that you are all-knowing.
Once again. Right... YOU KNOW that it will be useless. What if they make repairs so expensive that without gold you can't continue playing. Then it won't be so useless anymore, will it? And they make it so painfully hard to get from drops that you will be begging people do give you gold.Quote from "BryanM" »Ergo, gold will at best remain like water, instead of a currency. Which is okay, but the guy doesn't have to try so hard to razzle dazzle us...
I guess it's impossible, because you know better than Blizzard. -
May 11, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Bashiok on "Skill Trees" in Diablo 3.So why is everyone ignoring the fact that you will STILL have a pre-requisite of points until you can advance to the next tier? You simply can't pick the skills from the bottom of each 'tree', because by the time you can spend there, you will not have enough points to spend in three places. Why is that so hard to understand. Another thing is that they are still trees. That means that skills will have branches and progressions. They just need to put a progression arrow from skills in 4th and 5th tier of skills pointing down to 6th tier of skills and there you go.Posted in: News
Why is everybody more worried about balance than Blizzard is? You didn't even have 10 minutes to analyze the concept from your own imagination since you heard the news, and they have been PLAYTESTING the thing for months now maybe. But you still know better even though you don't know almost anything about it and didn't even put thought into it. -
Apr 28, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Fan Fiction ForumPosted in: News
That would be fantastic. Writing fiction was never my forte, but I'd try myself at composing and/or interpreting music.Quote from "Dauroth" »Too bad we don't have thing like this for music! -
Apr 16, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Diablo 3 Difficulty LevelsIron Maiden spell in A4 Hell was not nasty. It was beyond nasty. It was obviously buggy, or people who were in charge of balancing the game were eating some mushrooms.Posted in: News
-
Apr 9, 2009Dimebog posted a message on Fan-made Warcraft 3 / Diablo 3 game. Diablocraft III?I could 'somewhat' recreate D3 graphics in Wolfenstein 3D. Wonder what that would prove...Posted in: News
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
3
0
One legendary per two hours sounds like too much to me.
Sounds like too little to most other people. Everyone also seems to ignore the announcement of the hidden "safety net" that grants you a legendary drop in less than 8 hours of play of you were unlucky. If you are asking for this rule to apply equally for all legendaries including the most powerful ones, then you are just asking for things to be handed to you on a platter.
Oh well. it's never going to be a game for everyone.
0
The standards in gaming are shifting towards this trend of instant gratification - just look at the current complaints regarding the drop rates and remember the time a bunch of whiny idiots made Blizzard break their promise about keeping Inferno a near-impossible difficulty. People who have positive experiences with trading in D2 (and the annoying AH supporters who pretend to like trading because it nurtures the sacred ARPG tradition) just give themselves too much credit, not being willing to see the big picture.
0
I stopped watching after:
"...and my second account, which I use for auction house purposes"
There is almost nothing you can do with a second account (especially for AH purposes) that is allowed by the EULA you agreed on.
0
That's a great idea.
Also, OP, just because you can't grasp something doesn't make it bullshit.
0
Only not off of legendary items or gold.
I explained why that won't work in a previous post in this thread.
Selling random items which may or may not drop while the customer sits in town for hours? That's some wild imagination.
Nope. Any other ideas?
1
Awesome. If what you say is true, the game might actually have a longer life span than a week.
0
If they didn't do anything about RMT, you would use the same argument ten years from now and say how it never ruined D3 for those who still enjoy it. Just because there will always be people who have no problem with it doesn't change my opinion.
Oh? So people are just going to throw away their Paragon progress and restart their characters to play under the name PowerLewtDotCom198 because there's some items on that account? You can't even store 1/4 of the entire Legendary item pool in your stash and the seller can't mix and match the items you might need since they cannot be moved cross-account so yeah, you're wrong.
0
RMAH/AH was the best and quickest way to acquire items. Blizzard knows full well that by removing those, 3rd party sites will become the best thing which would be idiotic even if you restrict yourself from doing it because you realize it is idiotic. I don't care if people like to do it - too bad for them. No sympathy.
If you think getting items will be too hard - well too bad again - no sympathy for those who complain that something that should be hard in the game actually turns out to be hard.
0
0
Carry on.
0
Let's just agree on what you said in that paragraph and call it a day.
0
0
0
I gues I'd be willing to live with that risk.