• 1

    posted a message on Headphone Suggestions

    Don't buy headphones from mice and keyboard producers. Go for koss/akg/sennheiser.

    Posted in: General Discussion (non-Diablo)
  • 0

    posted a message on Halo of Arlyse - New Legendary Ring
    1) Frost armor is already infinitely less powerful defensive skill than Force armor

    2) Its like unity but just for melee damage



    So less defence for some frost novas that ANYWAYS wont protect from ranged attacks and this ring offers mostly melee damage reduction. Fuck logic?
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • 0

    posted a message on ***I noticed something Interesting in the latest PTR Notes...***
    Yes now ultra rare items are 2,5x more common. Enjoy.

    Personally I don't care about that as gameplay not rarity of items makes game good. And gameplay made me quit atm, so...
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I can't stand the Pony build crusader because....
    Quote from maratini»

    Quote from ElLucion»
    For me ponny build is ... strange? - Try to imagine somebody who is shooting .... horses? Weird
    I laughed at this. Conjuring up a horse is more wierd than say, conjuring a bowman? or a zombie dog? or shooting laser our of your hands? :D

    @OP: I agree that they can be dominating in the view. Personally I don't use that build in grps, mainly because of how it pushes mobs away more or less ruining the dmg of the rest of the grp, that and I also love condemn so much more. Blizz should definately edit the opacity of the skill, tbh edit it for all skills that aren't yours, cause stuff like DH ball lightning and even the endless waves of rockets can also be rather annoying.Aslong as the opacity doesn't go too low so you end up losing the feeling that there is actually a battle going on, apart from what your casting yourself.
    You can just use unruned version of skill - deal same dmg and doesnt knock back. LOL. Kappa. l2d3. And yes it is indeed much stranger than zombies and lasers xD If it wouldnt this thread would not exist. Ok thats shit argument. But its still weird. All runes of stampede should be tied to summoning avatars and "Stampede" build should be shifted to "blessed shield" build. Unrelenting Phalanx -> Bracers, belt or 2h weapon + effects of last bs rune and rework blessed shield to bounce on single enemy.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Can someone run scrip or something that will remove all "love problems solution"?
    Because seriously it is getting ridiculous.
    Posted in: Site Feedback
  • 0

    posted a message on What holds this class back from gr 50+
    Quote from raziael1»
    You misread that, yes I'm 100% aware that crusaders can use both a 2h and a shield.
    So why crus should have 10% cc, 750 str/vit/8cdr/15% skill dmg/leg affix for FREE over barb? It doesnt make sense to me whatsoever. (not "what so ever" btw.)
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 1

    posted a message on What holds this class back from gr 50+
    Quote from raziael1»
    Valid points, as anyone who's played a Roland's build knows we are married to the Akkhan set for reliable wrath re gen, as well as toughness.

    One thing that really stands out to me as well is the Heavenly Strength debuff. We are as of present designed around 2h weapons, BOP, Furnace,FOTF etc. I shouldn't have to say it, but each build has its own place in terms of T6 farming speed/GR viability. Considering this the 20% damage penalty makes no sense to me what so ever, as 2h weps were buffed for every class that could use them not just Crusaders.
    Wow, just wow. You didnt notice that crus can use 2h AND shield? >.>
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 0

    posted a message on PTR 2.1.2 - Why PTR Buffs Are Bad (Video)
    I think some people are completely missing the point, or 2 rather. So I'll reiterate why this is bad:

    1) Crazy buff hype means a large group of players who are simply bored with the game currently and just want to have some fun, but have no intention of actually providing feedback, flood the PTR servers. Blizz should have seen this coming and either modified the buff OR increased server capacity.

    2) A lot of those same people will soon (already starting) flood the forums here, d3, reddit, etc with QQ on why they can't get legendaries or ancient items fast enough, completely ignoring the fact that it's PTR. And, a lot of those same people who hopped on PTR because of the buff will stop playing the game shortly after once they realize it's back to grinding.

    I dunno, it's just a trend I've noticed, maybe some people just don't see it.
    Sounds like they actually care about feedback. Lol.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on PTR 2.1.2 - Legendary Gem - Molten Wildebeest's Gizzard Explained
    Thats true for +% damage. This is not +% its just %. % of hp regen into damage. Your hp regen dont deal damage to begin with ^^
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on WTB Blizz game that looks like this...
    Yeah, since they have no idea about balancing and creating diversity they could put some resources into better graphic effects. For example same images for travellers pledge/mara amulet or helltooth/jearam it is quite pathetic. And I can recall that hey said that legendary items will have unique models unlike in d2, despite that few weapons and MOST of chests are just reskinned white items >.>
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on WTB Blizz game that looks like this...
    Quote from ruksak»
    Even though my PC runs D3 on max settings in an acceptable manner, I turn my graphics all the way down to give me the smoothest performance at the highest FPS rate I can muster.

    I don't need eye candy. I need a game with depth, support and long term playability. I certainly don't need to be nickle 'n' dimed by some Korean knockoff with beautiful graphics.
    But it would be quite nice if game would have appropirate requirements to the graphics, isn't it?
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on WTB Blizz game that looks like this...
    Quote from mdcwdzies»

    [quote=Shiroiro;/members/243558-shiroiro;/forums/diablo-iii-general-forums/diablo-iii-general-discussion/97517-wtb-blizz-game-that-looks-like-this?comment=10]Games with 2 times better graphics than D3 have at least 2 times lower requirements dude. Blizz is just TERRIBLE at optimalisation. They could easily make much better graphics with the same requirements on other engine than their failed abomination. But it is too hard to buy damn source or ue4 >.>
    Source or I don't believe you...

    Source? Run d3 on lowest. Run far cry 4 on medium. Fps is more stable and HIGHER in fc4 for me. And im on lenovo y580. Ok actually its not 2 times better its infinitely better. But whatever. This whole talk about bad graphics like "they want to ensure that many people can play a game" is complete bullshit. It looks bad and it has high requirements.

    Oh my god, this site has best quoting system ever created. Kappa.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on WTB Blizz game that looks like this...
    Games with 2 times better graphics than D3 have at least 2 times lower requirements dude. Blizz is just TERRIBLE at optimalisation. They could easily make much better graphics with the same requirements on other engine than their failed abomination. But it is too hard to buy damn source or ue4 >.>
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New haunt in a ZDPS build ? (ptr)
    Yes thats pretty much no brainer :) Free 20% no even reason to think abou that.
    Posted in: Witch Doctor: The Mbwiru Eikura
  • 0

    posted a message on 2.12 PTR Notes - Something Missing?
    Its not. Will come later.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.