Quote fromI miss mockery.The list said he was "removed". I don't think it was voluntary.
Yes, but I'm also assuming it was him that gave (probably sold?) the site to Curse. Don't quote me on that or anything but I'm just inferring that from the post. If he hadn't done that he never would've gotten removed and everything would've stayed the same. That's what I meant, I don't get why he handed it over or whatever to them in the first place. Now we have a cookie cutter design that falls in with their other sites and upper level leadership that wasn't even around during the sites creation or high time in activity. It's not really an insult to the new owners because I'm sure they're all good people, but it's just weird, different, and not "homely" like it was. (and in case anyone's wondering based on my join date, I had a different account on here that was registered in 06)
0
But seriously, this game is going to be ridiculous. This could quite possibly turn out to be the greatest game of all time.
0
Yeah, sure, let's turn the Sorceress into the only legitimate MF'ing build. That'd do wonders. Who needs balance when you can just make one king?
Yeah, and someone will mention the Hammerdin. I don't care about damage that build gives. It's about the practicality of the speed teleport gives an MF'er. If only the Sorceress had it, then that would be the most run build for MF, so you're just creating a new problem.
0
0
0
0
1
Blizzard: [Professor Farnsworth] Good news, everyone! [/Professor Farnsworth] We're going to create a new patch for Diablo II! It's going to be super awesome!
Fans: HORAY!
Blizzard: Hey, go ahead and make a big list of things you want to see in the new patch on this thread on our forums! We'll look at it and take your suggestions to heart!
Fans: HORAY!!!!
Blizzard: Cool, well, it's April now and it should be out really soon! A few weeks at the most!
Fans: HORAY!!!!!
-Months go by-
Blizzard: Bad news, everyone. Other games are getting patched now, so we're delaying Diablo's. But don't worry because it's going to be super awesome and worth the wait!
Fans: Horay!
-Months go by-
Blizzard: It'll be here eventually! Still going to be super awesome!
Fans: Horay.
-Patch releases out of nowhere at almost the end of the year, almost 8 months after it was originally supposed to be released-
Blizzard: We've finally released the patch! It has almost nothing that most of you wanted, but it's still super cool!
Fans: ..... ASS!
0
Get them all from the Act bosses, transmute them, and you get a respec amulet.
Oops, I spoiled the big mystery for you.
0
Nothing but a re-spec, as other people have said.
I'm disappointed by that. I was really hoping they'd add some more lore content.
0
Diablo II was ugly, man. Change is not always bad.
1
0
0
You can't really find better images on google for DA that are isometric. I tried to keep the images smaller for respect for people with slower internet ... leme test out a fraps ...
Hm, seems my images automatically resize on here (I think I left the option checked), but I guess I'll take some isometric screens later and post it this size so it doesn't take forever to load (1850x1200 regularly)
0
Alright, quite simply, I've never had a problem with the art style of the game. In fact, I've always been one to bitch at the people bitching about the art style.
But I recently bought Dragon Age, and at certain points in combat I'm forced to go to the isometric view to get a better view of the battlefield. As I was playing I began to notice something: This is how Diablo III needs to look.
This is a game (Dragon Age) that is not a dark depressing game color palette wise (which is what the D3 devs said they wanted D3 to be like; non-dark depressing). One of Blizzard's main things with the new art style is that they wanted to use color to make it express the mood and what-not of the levels and game. But honestly, I think the art style of DA does this just as well as Diablo and actually looks more like Diablo should than Diablo III does.
Thoughts?
(EDIT: I actually noticed that those two screens of D.A. are an early version of the game ... but I don't think it should matter since the art it pretty much the same.)
Diablo III:
Dragon Age: Origins:
0