Who lied to you?
Quote from LinkX
You are talking about how you dislike DRM...on a forum dedicated to a game that is one of the most DRM intrusive games to date?
Also, if you have a meteor landing and it hits that sky bridge, you will get barely any meteor. Just an fyi...
Yeah, I'm weak when it comes to Diablo. Sue me.
Doesn't mean that I'm not vocal opposing this online-only bullshit whenever I get the chance. Lord knows it's made me a few enemies in this site.
Yeah, I know about the meteor. How else can I explore the skies, though?
That sticker is cool. It should be colored in army camoflauge colors then you will be a militant athiest and go debunk all sorts of lunatics.
I would never get a bumper sticker though... it's too label-ing
Yeeeeeah.......bumper stickers. A bit too much "this is what I believe and I'm making a point on you knowing it". No judgement, though (<--- is this one?)
Also, I can't check hours played, since I don't play via Steam.
Judge me all you want, you fool. I just dislike stuff like that, I don't need all that 'fluff' just to play games. It's cool that people like it, but I resent it when it becomes mandatory. That's why I reserve the right to crack and hack my way through it until the games I payed for can be run standalone.
Also, it's DRM (amongst other things, I know), and DRM can suck it.
EDIT: I'm building an aerial platform! Which made me inadvertently find some sort of floating island.
Quote from "Equinox" »I don't think our mods require such a test.
Quote from "Jetrall" »If you really want to be this disagreeable about a simple usage of semantics then we can do it via Personal Message. If you want to let it go and try to be a mature adult who is capable of reading just a little bit between the lines rather than being spoon-fed an explanation of my word choices, then by all means - please do.
Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »The rule exists to emphasize the difference between a healthy debate and one which is just flaming. It signifies that debating is not against the rules, and that disagreement is not forbidden so long as you adhere to the flaming rule.
Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »I was talking about way back, 2007 and before.
Quote from "Magistrate" »Sorry for the double post, but if I edited my last post, I don't think anyone would have ever read this, because it wouldn't show as a new post.
So, anyway, my question:
Say I have an image in my signature (which I do), but I want to add a bar- I'm not sure what they're called- like this:
I figured it's about the size of one line of text, and it's not really a signature "image" since its so short- is it okay if I have that and an image in my sig? The rules don't really say anything about having these little things in there, it just covers a main image and 3 lines of text. So I'm not sure if I'm supposed to interpret it as "only these are allowed" or not.
Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »Honestly, do you think anyone of us could ever muster the energy needed to run a project like this if everything we did and every ounce of work we put into it would be nothing more than an empty charade to keep up appearances and make people think we worked? I know I couldn't.
I think you're way too cynical. However you could probably call us too optimistic instead and change your idea of us from scheming manipulators to ihopeful moderators
Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »It's a little bit of both actually. Who said we can't develop the most extensive diablo wiki on the net?
Quote from "Faustuss" »Diablo I was released 12 years ago, you guys are kind of late in creating a wiki.
There's already a large and established Diablo wiki:
Having multiple wiki's for the same game just makes the quality of each worse. It's best for everyone to come together and focus on just one.
Quote from "Siaynoq" »I already see some entries I'd like to edit.
Quote from name="Pablo Riser" »What about site like this diablowiki and others. He have many interest information about game..
I dont undestend.. Why this project need us?
P.S. Anyway it is goood.
P.P.S. Sory for my grammar.
Quote from "Murderface" »It is possible, just very lazy. Anyway, I'll definitely be contributing with the sin wars being fresh in my mind.
Quote from "Zkid" »Merry Christmas all ^.^ not happy holidays...never happy holidays..:rolleyes:
Quote from "deathMars" »No no no. I said that to Equinox after he made a comment to me about me being a spammer.
But now when I actually think about it, I think this entire idea of X amount of posts and Y amount of months for an avatar seems kind of pointless since it kills the entire sense of identification which an avatar is supposed to bring. And I'm not just saying this because then my avatar privileges will be taken away.
Quote from "kefka666333abc123" »I think there should be a post/active time requirement for an avatar.....but w/e its not that big of a deal
Quote from "Thasador" »And I understand that as well. But if it is a concern about bandwidth..having a post requirement would help out greatly.
Quote from "PhrozenDragon" »Can it be combined? Like say, you both need to have been a member for two months and have 200 posts?
Quote from "Equinox" »Which is not a problem. First of all, it doesn't happen that much, nowhere where I posted. Second of all, mods are there to control spam...
Quote from "deathMars" »If you think so, may I have an explanation why?
Quote from "Thasador" »Yea, i post requirement would probably help out though a 1000 seems a bit extreme. maybe along the lines of 500 would do.