Who cares? You know that we are all going to play the game anyway. Regardless of the stat allocation system.
It's Blizzard we are talking about. When have they ever failed to please their fans?
-
- DiabloFanUser12055
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years
Last active Thu, Jun, 11 2009 17:10:19
- 1 Follower
- 162 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
-
Jul 1, 2008
DiabloFanUser12055 posted a message on Diablo 3 Items and InventoryPosted in: NewsQuote from "Kwic" »Oh, i got it just now lol. Am i interpreting it correctly? ^^
It means that for example 8 people are fighting against some boss. I'm one of them, we kill him, and there is a DIFFERENT loot for EACH player?? SO it means that it's certain i will get sth? It would be soo cool, coz sometimes you got lag, and you are screwed.. lol.
But how could it work? They will see my loot as well? If they do, then they won't be able to pick any of it? Don't get that
But the info is very promising 
cheers
Yeah means that different info will be sent to each player's computer. Only you will be able to see and pick up your loot. -
Jul 1, 2008
DiabloFanUser12055 posted a message on Diablo 3 Items and InventoryI love the new loot system. Each player will see there own randomly generated loot so no one will be racing to get that unique that just dropped on the ground.Posted in: News
Q: With the loot system in Diablo II, the player with the fastest connection often got the loot. Will this change?
A: We're changing the drop system. Monsters will drop multiple items, each player will see loot generated for them.
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/06/30/wwi08-diablo-3-design-fundamentals-part-2-qanda/ -
Apr 30, 2008
DiabloFanUser12055 posted a message on Diablo3.com becomes Diablofans.com! Blizzard acquires diablo3.com.This was the BIG announcement?Posted in: News
I don't know that any of us are "shaken".
Anyways. Oh well. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
I pray to God that if Diablo III comes out the graphics don't go 3-D. It would be terrible with modern graphics. They should just use enhanced Diablo II graphics and keep the isometric view and what not.
0
Yes I know there is a purpose behind all this. I was just saying it would be funny. Don't take everything so literally.
0
That I realize, but WoW has nerd appeal and it appeals to some normal people. However Lost Vikings would only appeal to the geeks who want to relive the glory days. All in all no one would buy it except the guys hanging out at the comic book store.
0
I don't even like or play WoW.
0
My mistake. I am not childish so I own up to them.
I thought you meant there was red in the area where the ice had melted (i.e. around the apparent "eyes"). Sorry we were on two different pages.
0
0
I see no red. None at all.
0
Exactly. 'Nuff said.
0
Not really. The entire pictures is drawn in different shades of blue. I don't think that an actual red Diablo is drawn under the surface. The creature will only appear in the final image. They are all separate and none of the previous ones or the current one have the full creature.
0
That would be hilarious if all these people spent hours coming up with idiotic conspiracies and these splash photos had nothing to with anything.
0
Why does matter what colors show up in the picture anyways?
0
Hmmm some people don't have the time to visit forums and post things all the time.
Where did you get the word "nub" anyways?
0
Haha, I have been here longer than you, and I bet I have been playing Blizzard games longer than you as well. I just never post. Hence my small amount of posts.
0
I shall quote myself. Once again - None of this will matter.
By the way - Why are you arguing over colors? Geeky much?
0