If a class has a choice between 1H+1H/offhand and 2H(+offhand) and one is vastly better than the other that isn't great, but not broken, but if a class has the same option and that classes damage output and survivability is significantly better than all other classes that's a whole differnt ball game (and AFAIK Heavenly Strength doesn't require a Flail so not subject to the 2H bow treatment).
2H Bow+Quiver is balanced damage wise with other class' options, whereas from what I can tell a Crusader with a 2H weapon+Shield will have higher damage output and defence than the other classes?
Well, it's been the same with the DH for over a year now. There are quivers, you can use a 2h on top of them. You don't ever need a 1h. Doesn't even cost a passive.
But IIRC 2H Bows have lower damage than 2H melee weapons to balance this out?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
But then that further gimps Crusaders that choose not to used 2H+Shield.....
The only real options seem to be that HS gives a bonus to 1H or the negative aspect of HS is made greater.
Because that seems the most sensible comparison?
If a class has a choice between 1H+1H/offhand and 2H(+offhand) and one is vastly better than the other that isn't great, but not broken, but if a class has the same option and that classes damage output and survivability is significantly better than all other classes that's a whole differnt ball game (and AFAIK Heavenly Strength doesn't require a Flail so not subject to the 2H bow treatment).
2H Bow+Quiver is balanced damage wise with other class' options, whereas from what I can tell a Crusader with a 2H weapon+Shield will have higher damage output and defence than the other classes?