yeh but the arey small they are river monsters, sea monsters would be huge
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
i enjoy fighting/killing dragons as much as the next guy, thats why i has the mods for BGII that put more dragons into the game.
but dragons just arent diablo, they werent in the previous games. if they are in the world of sanctuary and im not saying they are, dont you think with the vast size of diablo II: LOD we would have found one somewhere
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
even though they are old i would like to see several monsters from diablo 1 return;
The Knights
Succubi
mages
gargoyles
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
but dragons just arent diablo, they werent in the previous games. if they are in the world of sanctuary and im not saying they are, dont you think with the vast size of diablo II: LOD we would have found one somewhere
The Knights
Succubi
mages
gargoyles