To me it seems like you argue with the goal of elevating your own ego. My wordings where flawed, but it matters only to a douchebag. This is why I insulted you, not only because you deserved it, but also because I wanted our "discussion" to come to an dead end, I predicted nothing insightful would come from it. I am not here to challenge your ego, loosen up and just move along.
So I'm not only childish but a douchebag as well?
Thanks for the heads-up. But I guess I have been expecting too much here and was really hopeful you would man-up, grow some balls and admit you committed a mistake without having to resort to petty insults. We are on a forum, so words express mostly everything here. Thus if your wording is flawed, your argument is flawed. Simple as that.
You are indeed very immature. It's not an insult by the way. Your comebacks are worthy of a youtube flame war and that's as low as it can get. If I have an ego issue, you have serious self-esteem problems to think you need to insult anybody to prove your argument.
Also, it's written 'were' and not 'where' for future reference since you fail as much at Mathematics as at English.
Please do yourself a favor and refrain from posting again.
I pointed out the simple inconsistency of your first post in the thread. I showed no disrespect whatsoever. I chose to quote you because I read Emil's (Ophion) posts about two words names and wanted to add something to that and just then you posted about your one word thing. Now sure, if I wanted to go all trololo, maybe I would be all about how you need to learn to count.
But now you decided to make a super comeback by saying that my post was childish. Makes me want to troll for real.
But hey this could go on forever. Don't know if you are that immature or you are on a bad day or whatever but have it your way.
Also if you had the decency to read through a few of posts in this thread, your so-called point was explained much more clearly and without ambiguity. Since two-words names was an argument raised earlier, it actually makes my point in highlighting your mistake a valid one.
Get over yourself and grow up.
Think of it this way, if only allowed to use one word, which word would the classes use to define themself by?
Demon hunter. That's 2 words.
Anyway, now that Emil mentioned it, 2 words for classes is kind of annoying.
Witch doctor? Ya...annoying name as well.
No major gripe with the whole business though.
This thread is more like a compilation of personal-taste/preference-kind-of-thing rather than actual reasons why this name is good or bad.
Personally, I find it a silly name but I doubt D3 will suck because a character got named 'wrong'.
For people using childish rhetoric to look past logic:
*If only allowed to use two words.
Wow you made everything so mature all of a sudden. Too much for me to take.
Damn.
Edit- Eh..wait. Barbarian, wizard and monk are all one word definition.
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....
Let me guess. Your next post will be:
For people using childish rhetoric to look past logic:
*If only allowed to use up to two words.
Think of it this way, if only allowed to use one word, which word would the classes use to define themself by?
Demon hunter. That's 2 words.
Anyway, now that Emil mentioned it, 2 words for classes is kind of annoying.
Witch doctor? Ya...annoying name as well.
No major gripe with the whole business though.
This thread is more like a compilation of personal-taste/preference-kind-of-thing rather than actual reasons why this name is good or bad.
Personally, I find it a silly name but I doubt D3 will suck because a character got named 'wrong'.
I agree with the OP- the name is bland and boring. But I don't see how it is a problem. Fits the character perfectly well.
Don makes also a very good point. The name is simple and easy to grasp which is the key thing here I believe. Case in point Shelledface, seeing you had no alternative suggestion to make for Demon Hunter.
Personally, I would have preferred they'd called her Christina Aguliera but then the male version would have to have a different name you see...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Thanks for the heads-up. But I guess I have been expecting too much here and was really hopeful you would man-up, grow some balls and admit you committed a mistake without having to resort to petty insults. We are on a forum, so words express mostly everything here. Thus if your wording is flawed, your argument is flawed. Simple as that.
You are indeed very immature. It's not an insult by the way. Your comebacks are worthy of a youtube flame war and that's as low as it can get. If I have an ego issue, you have serious self-esteem problems to think you need to insult anybody to prove your argument.
Also, it's written 'were' and not 'where' for future reference since you fail as much at Mathematics as at English.
Please do yourself a favor and refrain from posting again.
Let me clear things up for you.
I pointed out the simple inconsistency of your first post in the thread. I showed no disrespect whatsoever. I chose to quote you because I read Emil's (Ophion) posts about two words names and wanted to add something to that and just then you posted about your one word thing. Now sure, if I wanted to go all trololo, maybe I would be all about how you need to learn to count.
But now you decided to make a super comeback by saying that my post was childish. Makes me want to troll for real.
But hey this could go on forever. Don't know if you are that immature or you are on a bad day or whatever but have it your way.
Also if you had the decency to read through a few of posts in this thread, your so-called point was explained much more clearly and without ambiguity. Since two-words names was an argument raised earlier, it actually makes my point in highlighting your mistake a valid one.
Get over yourself and grow up.
Wow you made everything so mature all of a sudden. Too much for me to take.
Damn.
Edit- Eh..wait. Barbarian, wizard and monk are all one word definition.
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....
Let me guess. Your next post will be:
For people using childish rhetoric to look past logic:
*If only allowed to use up to two words.
Demon hunter. That's 2 words.
Anyway, now that Emil mentioned it, 2 words for classes is kind of annoying.
Witch doctor? Ya...annoying name as well.
No major gripe with the whole business though.
This thread is more like a compilation of personal-taste/preference-kind-of-thing rather than actual reasons why this name is good or bad.
Personally, I find it a silly name but I doubt D3 will suck because a character got named 'wrong'.
Don makes also a very good point. The name is simple and easy to grasp which is the key thing here I believe. Case in point Shelledface, seeing you had no alternative suggestion to make for Demon Hunter.
Personally, I would have preferred they'd called her Christina Aguliera but then the male version would have to have a different name you see...