sounds ok, but guns and futuristic inst diablo, so would people stop implying it is the next diablo.
guild wars was closer, it had diablo team members work on it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
correct how can it be the next diablo if it is a futuristic FPS
to be the next diablo it has to be an fantasy, medieval (years 1200-1500), 3rd person RPG, (or possibly a MMORPG)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
guild wars was closer, it had diablo team members work on it.
to be the next diablo it has to be an fantasy, medieval (years 1200-1500), 3rd person RPG, (or possibly a MMORPG)