They copy rumors, hide the fact that its based on rumors in the title, others copy headlines and suddenly people think they have evidence - based on thin air.
There is a difference between a remake and remaster, SC1 was a remaster, slightly upgraded grapics and a few ui improvements, versus a remake that is suppose to be rebuilt from the ground up and introduces new story elements like new cut scenes, new animations, new ui, new graphics ect...
The probablem with reforged was that it was promised to be a remake but ended up being a remaster, and people were not happy.
it could have singlehandedly ruined all of Blizzard's plans for future projects as people will have lost trust.
People were unhappy because they delivered far less than annocuned at Blizzcon. They shdowed some things that peole thought "uh Blizzard plans something big". Then they cut a lot of those things (probably only due to lack of ressources because the game was missing base multiplayer features the old game had, some bigger bugs and they tried to make it impossible to play the old wc3).
In other words, they simply didnt even do a good remake. They replaced WC3 by a version ,that had better graphics, but missed some (important) multiplayer features and was cut heavily during development.
Officially it was always "due to player demands". But that doesnt make sense because cutting ressources would have meant they would have had more time for other features and bug fixing - WC3 Reforged sucked here completely.
AOE2 DE had extra campaigns, contained promised features, additional factions etc. It kept the old essence and improved it. AFAIK they even didnt make it impossible to play the old version.
Blozzard did everything to screw up players. I didnt even know up to release that you couldnt play the old game any longer as soon as they released it...
For me WC3 Reforged is a disaster for so many reasons - and that swhy i dont want a D2 Reforged. It wouldnt be any good with current Blizzard. They should probably outsource it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Well that is pure clickbait.
They copy rumors, hide the fact that its based on rumors in the title, others copy headlines and suddenly people think they have evidence - based on thin air.
People were unhappy because they delivered far less than annocuned at Blizzcon. They shdowed some things that peole thought "uh Blizzard plans something big". Then they cut a lot of those things (probably only due to lack of ressources because the game was missing base multiplayer features the old game had, some bigger bugs and they tried to make it impossible to play the old wc3).
In other words, they simply didnt even do a good remake. They replaced WC3 by a version ,that had better graphics, but missed some (important) multiplayer features and was cut heavily during development.
Officially it was always "due to player demands". But that doesnt make sense because cutting ressources would have meant they would have had more time for other features and bug fixing - WC3 Reforged sucked here completely.
AOE2 DE had extra campaigns, contained promised features, additional factions etc. It kept the old essence and improved it. AFAIK they even didnt make it impossible to play the old version.
Blozzard did everything to screw up players. I didnt even know up to release that you couldnt play the old game any longer as soon as they released it...
For me WC3 Reforged is a disaster for so many reasons - and that swhy i dont want a D2 Reforged. It wouldnt be any good with current Blizzard. They should probably outsource it.