Ever in diablo 2 you are not that faraway.In this camera your a little more they could have mad the armor more real and the weapons and they would have not have to made it more faraway. Because as of now they look like crap and don't till me you don't want your armor to look super sweet when you play diablo and weapons.
I really want to see the other art desgin blizzard came up with .With Diablo 3 so i can compare what was the best choice for the art desgin in the end and what could have been improve on bet blizzard didn't want to do so they want a good start .I guess bet hopefully this game does will because when this game comes's out there are going to be a lot of mix feeling on how it will look on the final day.
They had huge financial backing from a number of korean parties, so finance wasn't an issue to be fair. Also, they were developing the game for 4 years or so.
I personally believe they tried aiming for too much in the game, and they simply ran out of time and money to include everything. The finished product is something of an empty to shell because of this.
Oddly enough, pretty much the only people on the Hellgate team who are ex-Blizz are all in the Art department ;).
Yea it's 2008 graphic bet this looks compare. To other rpg game look's werid to me there are a lot of graphically improvements and.I am pretty sure blizzard can get some tools for making a realistic in some ways
in diablo 3 so it's really should not be a probably with blizzard so .
I mean at last make in a little more real . In weapon's and armor because they look like crap as of now yea it's hard to make thing's come out clean and crisp bet. I am sure they can make thing's look a little more believed to the diablo universe graphically in a way.... Really its those weapon's and armor that bug me so much damn close up or far away.In Diablo 2 you can see the armor and weapons clearly with great detail for it's time bet.. .and the camera is to pulled back as. I see it hopefully they will make things more real in a way by armor and weapons are my main probably .
They tried to carry on the spirit of Diablo, minus the franchise, and falled falt on their faces.
The game was incredibly drab, with uninspired gothic 'hell' areas that just simply didn't work in 3D.
You no why because they were on a budget and .They didn't have a good lot of time something for movie games there always rushed and .They just rushed for release it was a good concept bet the game play and heart of the game (Hell gate) was lacking. I guess flagship was thinking to fast of making a game just because they got the dudes from blizzard and wanted to see what they could do pretty much they lost there touch with that game bet .I am pretty sure they will come out with same amazing next time.
Yea we no what the really world looks like.Like they said diablo is a fantasy... fantasy means's not really so why male the weather real and not the area?or the character .
in diablo 3 so it's really should not be a probably with blizzard so .
ARMOR AND WEAPONS PEOPLE!!!
You no why because they were on a budget and .They didn't have a good lot of time something for movie games there always rushed and .They just rushed for release it was a good concept bet the game play and heart of the game (Hell gate) was lacking. I guess flagship was thinking to fast of making a game just because they got the dudes from blizzard and wanted to see what they could do pretty much they lost there touch with that game bet .I am pretty sure they will come out with same amazing next time.