for epl, man u plays pretty, anderson, hernadez, rooney, cleverly, nani and young all have some creative juice, dont compare them to barca but for an epl side that isnt the failure of arsenal, its relatively attractive.
i feel like anelka, drogba and torres are all best as lone strikers and with wing/atmid help since they are all ballhogs when it comes to shooting. someone like modric would have fit in nicely...
remember, anelka was a big transfer bust for many years before reestablishing himself at chelsea. so alls not lost with torres.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Remember the String of Ears
"to the worm in horseradish, the world is horseradish."
What attractive football? Barcelona plays attractive football. United don't.
Well then it's just the matter of taste. I am personally like MU's style more. It's fast and furious yet elegant and creative (like last years Portu). For example in Barcelona there is not that much "fast and furios" and in German national team there's no elegancy nor creativity, though those two crush mostly everything...
And for me the problem of Chelsea seems to be in management. After Abramovich came there they just buying everything without thinking of how it would work together. They switched several coaches, bought few of the best in the world players, but there is no one solid playstyle these all would fit in. The same is going now in ManCity i wonder how their managers will handle that.