Lawful Neutral because I believe there are reasons we have laws and rules and believe that they need to be obeyed. People can't just do whatever they want to or nothing constructive would ever get done in a timely manner. I chose Neutral, though, because I wouldn't go completely out of my way to "chase down evil", since it will always exist along side its natural polar opposite, "good", and therefore would be a fruitless effort in the long run.
You never heard of bad laws?
Quote from "Jetrall" »
K not getting into this anal-retentive debate.
Elfen, I wouldn't have pegged you as Chaotic Good. Probably just because of your avatar. Then again, I also shouldn't judge a book by its cover.
I always saw Elfen as a more Lawful Neutral or Lawful Good person rather then Chaotic Good...
Quote from "Siaynoq" »
Mm, I suppose I'd be neutral/neutral. We're talking about just in games right?
No, I am talking real life, and I assume that the others were as well.
Quote from "Siaynoq" »
None of us are any of these things in real life.
Why can you not be these things in real life? You don't believe you can be generally lawful good person? Or a lawful evil person? (Example: I personally believe George Bush to be a Lawful Evil person. It just fits him perfectly.)
Why can you not be these things in real life? You don't believe you can be generally lawful good person? Or a lawful evil person? (Example: I personally believe George Bush to be a Lawful Evil person. It just fits him perfectly.)
Chaotic Neutral? Lawful Evil? It just doesn't work to describe a person in real life. Maybe if you had like a Sedentary Fats, or a Lethargic Housewife.
I could see maybe describe world leaders using this kind of categorization. But they're actions resonate far beyond ordinary people's actions.
That's why I put "there are exceptions" in there. And I, personally, regard any law that is unfair to the whole as not a law, but an idiosyncrasy with "good". Therefor, if it hinders "good", it isn't a "good law" and therefor not a "law" for me because I would be "good".
No, I don't feel like getting in to the stupid "but good is relative" debate because that isn't the point of this post. I'm typing this all assuming you mean "good" as allegorical and/or relative.
Neutral Good for me. As has been pointed out, these descriptions are a little hard to apply in real life. However I always felt that alignment fitted me the best in games with these alignments. I'm not much of a roleplayer, so I'm assuming that's how I am in real life. Of in the very least how I would like to be.
PlugY for Diablo II allows you to reset skills and stats, transfer items between characters in singleplayer, obtain all ladder runewords and do all Uberquests while offline. It is the only way to do all of the above. Please use it.
Supporting big shoulderpads and flashy armor since 2004.
I always thought of myself as Chaotic Good until I started killing people for bottlecaps. Fuck it. Three Dog still thinks I'm fly though, so it's cool.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
You never heard of bad laws?
I always saw Elfen as a more Lawful Neutral or Lawful Good person rather then Chaotic Good...
No, I am talking real life, and I assume that the others were as well.
Why can you not be these things in real life? You don't believe you can be generally lawful good person? Or a lawful evil person? (Example: I personally believe George Bush to be a Lawful Evil person. It just fits him perfectly.)
I could see maybe describe world leaders using this kind of categorization. But they're actions resonate far beyond ordinary people's actions.
Siaynoq's Playthroughs
Siaynoq's Playthroughs
edit: But if anything else, I'd might be chaotic evil, because most of the time, I just don't give a damn.
One becomes strong when they are fighting to protect someone close to them... - Shiro Haku
That's why I put "there are exceptions" in there. And I, personally, regard any law that is unfair to the whole as not a law, but an idiosyncrasy with "good". Therefor, if it hinders "good", it isn't a "good law" and therefor not a "law" for me because I would be "good".
No, I don't feel like getting in to the stupid "but good is relative" debate because that isn't the point of this post. I'm typing this all assuming you mean "good" as allegorical and/or relative.