Alright it turns out i was alittle misinformed. The radio station I was listening too (the segment; nights with alice cooper) said what i said implying that the death of the jaguar was punishment for the kill it made earlier. While trying to find more info on the subject i found this site and it states differently. It says that they shot the jaguar to protect the dying women.. Its kind of vague so i suggest you read it to make your own conclusions.
on a side note, just because of my misinformation it dosent mean you should stop your theological arguement on account of my new information. But here is the site:
Angus the peasant saw the necromancer raising the rotting remains and ran away. Since then he told the tale of how he narrowly escaped the necromancer he called "juicy bones".
very insightful yet cynical perception of life murderface..
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Angus the peasant saw the necromancer raising the rotting remains and ran away. Since then he told the tale of how he narrowly escaped the necromancer he called "juicy bones".
yeah i know. But yeah I think its time for a new topic.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Angus the peasant saw the necromancer raising the rotting remains and ran away. Since then he told the tale of how he narrowly escaped the necromancer he called "juicy bones".
I need not faith to lean on. I've been independable long enough to see that the faithful have no better luck than I. When people talk of religion all I hear is the flawed science of the Dark and Middle ages rambling in my ears. There will be a paradime shift in the way religion is viewed in the coming decades, the future is realisim. Debate knowledge and be left behind...
I can go way deeper, a barbarian war is the reason why most western civilizations adopted christianity. A war lord by the name of Clovus adopted the religion because he belived that the christian god sided with him in a great battle and his nation followed suit. many of us today might have been pagan if clovus had lost his war.
What im trying to say is that all we precieve as "good" has its roots in "evil" that if you look at things from an educated standpoint all seems neutral and only a lack of infomation can alter the subject to "good" or "evil".
Humans like making things simple. They also dont like not knowing stuff. What to do? create a religion where God created everything. You have a question? ask god (pray). something good happen? thank God. something bad happen? God damn it. or it was the devil! Im oversimplifying things and if you havent realized yet im a full out athiest. God was created by man to answer the deepest relevent question to our existance: why are we here? to walk in the light of God? i dont think so. I think you have to walk your own path..
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Angus the peasant saw the necromancer raising the rotting remains and ran away. Since then he told the tale of how he narrowly escaped the necromancer he called "juicy bones".
Good and evil were created to control people. Clovus, or Peter (Christianity was adopted in many different places), or anyone has nothing to do with it, he was just the one to pass it over, it could have been anyone else. Christianity came over and it was there to stay, and it was there to be embedded into the society in one shape or the other.
God is deeper than that. The non-church God. For the simple people, it's just an explanation of everything, a direction to live in, the reason to be "good", something to diminish one's fear of death, something to explain the reason for existance of man etc., but for the less simple people, God is something different.
One Clovus did bring Christianity to Western Europe which affected the Americas greatly via Britain, France, and Spain (the Byzantine Empire is another story). Second There would be no christianity if Jesus had not been prosecuted (out of "hate"). All of that is irrelavent, my point [above] overshadows the previous statements that you are debating.
One Clovus did bring Christianity to Western Europe which affected the Americas greatly via Britain, France, and Spain (the Byzantine Empire is another story). Second There would be no christianity if Jesus had not been prosecuted (out of "hate"). All of that is irrelavent, my point [above] overshadows the previous statements that you are debating.
I would agree about Jesus, but not Clovus. Clovus was any other person. It could have been anyone else, and it would have been, eventually, because of Jesus.
Your point overshadows anything only from your point of view.
The Barbarian nations saw the Christian god as a warlord that would side with them in battle. They saw Romes past millitary achievments as an act of god. You have a lack of information.
"What im trying to say is that all we precieve as "good" has its roots in "evil" that if you look at things from an educated standpoint all seems neutral and only a lack of infomation can alter the subject to "good" or "evil"."
The Christian (not Catholic) God is not a source of power for a battle, only the unfaithful have used God in that way, and they are not the ones who brought true Christianity (not church Christianity) to the people, and the reason why people are the way they are now, (but not after now), is because of the true Christianity, or, rather, true collection of morals, Buddism isn't any different from the medieval God, it is the churches that began to separate them and say "you worship God the wrong way". Well, I AM a deist, after all.
Why do you bring that citation up? I already read it before, and considering that I don't treat good or evil more than a collection of concepts, I don't understand why are you quoting that to me when it has nothing to do with my point of view.
You cant show me anything solid. I gave facts and a concept of thought and you chose to debate the facts? I'm not saying religion is all bad, just that it has its "roots" in "evil". I have a revision to the concept though. War is the reason for our comfortable lives in todays society. War pushes economy invention and ideas (political religious or moral). If this is true does that mean war is "good" and peace is "evil" in the long run?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
on a side note, just because of my misinformation it dosent mean you should stop your theological arguement on account of my new information. But here is the site:
http://newsfeedresearcher.com/data/articles_n9/idn2007.02.26.06.41.32.html
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
the issue with the jag has been cleared up i think with the real story behind it being revealed
dam murderface that was deep and i think i kinda understood it
I guess so.
That was regular, and you can go a LOT deeper if you want to. Our existence doesn't really make sense.
What im trying to say is that all we precieve as "good" has its roots in "evil" that if you look at things from an educated standpoint all seems neutral and only a lack of infomation can alter the subject to "good" or "evil".
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
God is deeper than that. The non-church God. For the simple people, it's just an explanation of everything, a direction to live in, the reason to be "good", something to diminish one's fear of death, something to explain the reason for existance of man etc., but for the less simple people, God is something different.
And I am a deist.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Your point overshadows anything only from your point of view.
And you are forgetting Russia.
1. Goths
2.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
"What im trying to say is that all we precieve as "good" has its roots in "evil" that if you look at things from an educated standpoint all seems neutral and only a lack of infomation can alter the subject to "good" or "evil"."
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Why do you bring that citation up? I already read it before, and considering that I don't treat good or evil more than a collection of concepts, I don't understand why are you quoting that to me when it has nothing to do with my point of view.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.