You ferret are one clever man, baldurs gate was one of the great games when it games to iso-rpgs. An updated Bg graphics style would be wicked for d3 but they would have to keep the centered character.
It would be nice if there will be 3d graphics to enjoy Diablo's new environment.But the most important thing is the main storyline of Diablo 3.Would it be the continuation of the Worldstone's Destruction or the start of something new???Think of it guys!!!!
COME ON YOU GUYS!!!! You can't be die hard diablo fans unless you want to keep it original. How many people would go back and change the gameplay and really be able to say it's just like the old times. I don't want to be doing any kind of first person summoning or first person casting in a ALL NEW 3D world. Forget that noise. I want the old school. That's what it's all about. Remember your roots. If they make it the old diablo style it will be out of this world. New characters.
New story. New twists.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
All power resides in the mind, let it be unleashed, to those unsure let it overwhelm and eventually, destroy
I think that if they changed D3 to be a 3D game not unlike that of WoW then it would take away from what had helped attract gamers to the first 2 Diablo games. It just wouldnt feel the same playing D3 if it's graphics werent similar to Diablo 2 and the original.
Discuss, what do you think would be best for the new Diablo 3!?
i think they should keep it like other diablo but bether quallity and you can sroll out and in toward the character more 3d but same like diablo 2:cool: .
i think diablo 2 is the best game ever well almost
couz of the grafic if its better grafic more people would come thats for sure.now. ...... i think the old way of diablo2 is better.
If they change the style, it will no longer have the hart of Diablo. It is all in 1 against many battles...good story...great characters...many way's to finish the game. And i think they should at least leave a barbarian and a sorceress with litle diferent skills...and add few new characters.
They can continue with the Diablo franchise, but the remainder of the team has been moved to the Irvine headquarters so they can be more closely moderated. The original team was further north of Irvine, therefore having the division called Blizzard North.
That's also why they are hiring new "Lead" jobs for the team behind Diablo I and II because it's difficult to make a new game without solid execution and supervision.
The leaders of Blizzard North have gone on to form their own companies and make new games, such as Guild Wars and Hellgate: London.
I think that the "Diablo" style is very unique and should stay that way. If they use the WoW 3d style then everyone will say it looks like Wow, to steal a quote from someone Diablo is Diablo, World of Warcraft is World of Warcraft, keep it seperate.
Well, I guess all you can do is hope that whatever they choose to do, be it 3d or 2d is that it looks good. They could just hybrid it so you could choose first person or third person like what someone said, sorry I can't remember the name of the person, but I know it was said.
i think they should keep it as it is cous if you do like warcraft3 it wouldent be the same then it would be warcraft styel wich is not an good idea . so its just better to keep in d2 style just add better grafic and make no dam shit hacks and add more item and new sword and stuff.maybe make it harder . oh yeah dont forget it be better if you can go higher then lvl 99 then we can spent more time on it . i hope most of people agree with me ty.