Some of the people in this thread crack me up. Saying stuff like "one game for the price of three" and all that blah blah. You need to take that blah blah to the blah blah factory. (anyone get that reference?)
Either way. Who are you or any of us define what a "game" is or how much content a "game" should have? Last time I checked, Bejeweled was a game with almost zero real content... but StarCraft with only one campaign is only a third of a game? Seriously.
Blizzard makes the best games they possibly can, and while money will always be important, they had other reasons for doing this.
The single player campaign will have extra units, missions, techs and an in depth storyline. Not to mention, we'll be playing it in 2009, instead of 2010/2011. That's a good enough reason for me.
Either way. Who are you or any of us define what a "game" is or how much content a "game" should have? Last time I checked, Bejeweled was a game with almost zero real content... but StarCraft with only one campaign is only a third of a game? Seriously.
Blizzard makes the best games they possibly can, and while money will always be important, they had other reasons for doing this.
The single player campaign will have extra units, missions, techs and an in depth storyline. Not to mention, we'll be playing it in 2009, instead of 2010/2011. That's a good enough reason for me.
/thread
Vote:
http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17929