now if we could just work on the (active) members milestones. Members List says there are 2304 (at the time i posted this). wonder if we will get to 3000.
i remember at sorcerers.net things got pretty interesting the nearer we got to 10,000 members, even if some were non active.
but on the subject of posts, i suppose me reaching 6000 should yield some sort of interest.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
now if we could just work on the (active) members milestones. Members List says there are 2304 (at the time i posted this). wonder if we will get to 3000.
i remember at sorcerers.net things got pretty interesting the nearer we got to 10,000 members, even if some were non active.
but on the subject of posts, i suppose me reaching 6000 should yield some sort of interest.
Man was that unpredictable.. except maybe for someone who actually watched the post count.
I doubt we will get any higher than that for active members, we rarely have an active member count over 100. Or so I see..
Maybe on your 10,000th post we will all go crazy =P
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"There's no doughnuts in Diablo. Oohhhh, I just threw it down. BlizzCon exclusive: no doughnuts. -Jay Wilson
Man was that unpredictable.. except maybe for someone who actually watched the post count.
I doubt we will get any higher than that for active members, we rarely have an active member count over 50. Or so I see..
Maybe on your 10,000th post we will all go crazy =P
I put active in brackets for a reason.
too many inactive people here. half the time it seems like there isnt even 100 people here that would be considered active. and that is shocking.
Soon as D3, new game in the diablo universe, new patch for LOD, ladder reset for LOD is announced things should change, at least for a while, like they did with the SCII announcement.
lol maybe, but it would require someone else to try and beat me there. wont be the same if i achieve it by myself unchallenged.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
And If I timed it correctly, it really is. So....yeah.
Ya, thats me angry.
now if we could just work on the (active) members milestones. Members List says there are 2304 (at the time i posted this). wonder if we will get to 3000.
i remember at sorcerers.net things got pretty interesting the nearer we got to 10,000 members, even if some were non active.
but on the subject of posts, i suppose me reaching 6000 should yield some sort of interest.
Man was that unpredictable.. except maybe for someone who actually watched the post count.
I doubt we will get any higher than that for active members, we rarely have an active member count over 100. Or so I see..
Maybe on your 10,000th post we will all go crazy =P
Im saying that for people who werent it was unpredictable. I thought it would hit 100,000 later than this.
I put active in brackets for a reason.
too many inactive people here. half the time it seems like there isnt even 100 people here that would be considered active. and that is shocking.
Soon as D3, new game in the diablo universe, new patch for LOD, ladder reset for LOD is announced things should change, at least for a while, like they did with the SCII announcement.
lol maybe, but it would require someone else to try and beat me there. wont be the same if i achieve it by myself unchallenged.
Post 6,666 is the best one after 666 so it may be a while.
Number was 648.