It's diablo 3, amazing anyway. D2 looks shit but who cares?
Juno since i like you i shall try to explaint the following with as less flaming as possible
Moxx is not trolling if thats what you guys ment, he is just pointing the obvious, and i dont think it was neccecery for him to have had to explain himself if people just used their brains, so when he says ''early in the game'' one could have figured out that he ment ''early in development'', witch is logic and speaks foritself.
Another thing is, why people tend to whine about graphics that are old and they know for a FACT that the graphics from nowadays look much more better, like Moxx sayd, just look @ Beta gameplay.
I'm not concerned about it.
The screen shots are pretty poor, there's no arguing that. That's not a statement on the entire game, just the screen shots in question.
I do think it's poor choice to provide a major magazine running an exclusive article on your game very poor quality screen shots that DO NOT represent the final product at all. They surely have better screen shots from ACT 3 that they could have supplied than this.
The game is uggly even in beta... Thats eye killing material ¬¬
Adn serioulsy the amount of fanboys is much more annoying then the amount of trolls.
Troll > fanboy any time, anywhere.
sooooo, if I like ANYTHING that blizz does, I'm a fanboy? Instead I should instantly hate / rage on everything blizzard to avoid being called a fan (which not only I am, but you are too) and instead become a troll? You guys make no sense.
Wow, what's with all the crying and worrying over a few pictures taken probably months ago, from a magazine? Have any of you watched the beta videos? The game looks great! Stop worrying over a few pixelated pictures...jeez, some people.
The game is uggly even in beta... Thats eye killing material ¬¬
Adn serioulsy the amount of fanboys is much more annoying then the amount of trolls.
Troll > fanboy any time, anywhere.
sooooo, if I like ANYTHING that blizz does, I'm a fanboy? Instead I should instantly hate / rage on everything blizzard to avoid being called a fan (which not only I am, but you are too) and instead become a troll? You guys make no sense.
No.
You're a fanboy when you like stuff only because it's Blizz. If another company would make that execly same graphic people would not like it that much.
I called some on this thread fanboys because noone would never call D3 "brillhant". The game doesn't have dynamic light, the polygom count is pretty low, there are terrible textures in game (like the vomit of putrid mothers and the purple stuff spilled in arcane damage kills) and the animation is not motion captured. That pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about...
Those 4 points alone makes D3's graphics kind bad. Blizz is allways bad at the graphical part.
sooooo, if I like ANYTHING that blizz does, I'm a fanboy? Instead I should instantly hate / rage on everything blizzard to avoid being called a fan (which not only I am, but you are too) and instead become a troll? You guys make no sense.
No.
You're a fanboy when you like stuff only because it's Blizz. If another company would make that execly same graphic people would not like it that much.
I called some on this thread fanboys because noone would never call D3 "brillhant". The game doesn't have dynamic light, the polygom count is pretty low, there are terrible textures in game (like the vomit of putrid mothers and the purple stuff spilled in arcane damage kills) and the animation is not motion captured. That pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about...
Those 4 points alone makes D3's graphics kind bad. Blizz is allways bad at the graphical part.
Diablo has never been about amazing graphics, if you noticed by D2 you can see it's not overly developed for even a game of that time. And "pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about" just shows you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about. Call me a fanboy, cause frankly I don't give a shit if you do. You're some random on the internet.
sooooo, if I like ANYTHING that blizz does, I'm a fanboy? Instead I should instantly hate / rage on everything blizzard to avoid being called a fan (which not only I am, but you are too) and instead become a troll? You guys make no sense.
No.
You're a fanboy when you like stuff only because it's Blizz. If another company would make that execly same graphic people would not like it that much.
I called some on this thread fanboys because noone would never call D3 "brillhant". The game doesn't have dynamic light, the polygom count is pretty low, there are terrible textures in game (like the vomit of putrid mothers and the purple stuff spilled in arcane damage kills) and the animation is not motion captured. That pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about...
Those 4 points alone makes D3's graphics kind bad. Blizz is allways bad at the graphical part.
Diablo has never been about amazing graphics, if you noticed by D2 you can see it's not overly developed for even a game of that time. And "pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about" just shows you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about. Call me a fanboy, cause frankly I don't give a shit if you do. You're some random on the internet.
The fact that no blizz game is about good graphics doesn't change the fact that graphics in Blizz games are indeed bad. If people said "D3 graphics is just ok, but it doesn't matter because thats not what i'm looking for" it would be ok, but no... Fanboys are saying D3 graphics are good.
And yeah, i'm not a computational design student so, yeah, theres plenty of technical stuff i can't talk about. But non techical details (polygon counts, light effects, animation) we all can talk about and the fact is, D3 technology is outdated (by those criterias) and thats a 100% objective fact, not a matter of opnion.
And i just said fanboys are annoying because they don't have a constructive opnion about anything in the game. Fanboy infested forums sucks because all threads is filled with comments like "this game rules !!11111!" instead of information/analysis of how the games gonna be.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"In time the hissing of her sanity
Faded out her voice and soiled her name
And like marked pages in a diary
Everything seemed clean that is unstained
The incoherent talk of ordinary days
Why would we really need to live?
Decide what is clear and what's within a haze
What you should take and what to give" - Opeth
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I'm not concerned about it.
The screen shots are pretty poor, there's no arguing that. That's not a statement on the entire game, just the screen shots in question.
I do think it's poor choice to provide a major magazine running an exclusive article on your game very poor quality screen shots that DO NOT represent the final product at all. They surely have better screen shots from ACT 3 that they could have supplied than this.
Adn serioulsy the amount of fanboys is much more annoying then the amount of trolls.
Troll > fanboy any time, anywhere.
sooooo, if I like ANYTHING that blizz does, I'm a fanboy? Instead I should instantly hate / rage on everything blizzard to avoid being called a fan (which not only I am, but you are too) and instead become a troll? You guys make no sense.
No.
You're a fanboy when you like stuff only because it's Blizz. If another company would make that execly same graphic people would not like it that much.
I called some on this thread fanboys because noone would never call D3 "brillhant". The game doesn't have dynamic light, the polygom count is pretty low, there are terrible textures in game (like the vomit of putrid mothers and the purple stuff spilled in arcane damage kills) and the animation is not motion captured. That pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about...
Those 4 points alone makes D3's graphics kind bad. Blizz is allways bad at the graphical part.
Diablo has never been about amazing graphics, if you noticed by D2 you can see it's not overly developed for even a game of that time. And "pluss a tons of technical stuff i don't kno about" just shows you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about. Call me a fanboy, cause frankly I don't give a shit if you do. You're some random on the internet.
The fact that no blizz game is about good graphics doesn't change the fact that graphics in Blizz games are indeed bad. If people said "D3 graphics is just ok, but it doesn't matter because thats not what i'm looking for" it would be ok, but no... Fanboys are saying D3 graphics are good.
And yeah, i'm not a computational design student so, yeah, theres plenty of technical stuff i can't talk about. But non techical details (polygon counts, light effects, animation) we all can talk about and the fact is, D3 technology is outdated (by those criterias) and thats a 100% objective fact, not a matter of opnion.
And i just said fanboys are annoying because they don't have a constructive opnion about anything in the game. Fanboy infested forums sucks because all threads is filled with comments like "this game rules !!11111!" instead of information/analysis of how the games gonna be.