More there are, more Crazy it will be .. I think!
Just gotta evade the Geeks =p
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Be a Gamer or Die Tryin'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- " And So our Tale ends, Bruenor BattleHammer.. In battle, as it should" -Drizzt Do'Urden -Ice Wind Dale-
I think they made 4 people to be the maximum on purpose. well that was obvious
anyway it is a lot more fun to always try to come up with new tactics rather than have all the 5 classes and it's always the same. if you understand...
but what if you want 'huge' (if you can call 8 people huge) 8 people trading games like in d2? ugh o well actually now that i think about it 4 isnt too bad, as d1 was heaps fun.
4 per game is gay, to me some of the funnest times were when ladder resets and having a party of 8 was a must...blizzard said that this game is made for people to play together online and im sure everyone here has more than 3 other friends that he/she would like in their game, plus im sure people here already have a lvling party when d3 starts which was probably bigger than a 4 people group
errrrrrrrrrrr I was hoping for 8 or even more. Oh well im sure I will survive and enjoy the game :P. Id love to see trading and dueling games have more tho if possible
Nowhere do I see a suitable option for me on that poll....
8 People or more per game please.... Please, Please, Please.
I believe option number 5 is the correct one for you:
4, wtf? this sucks. blizzard is using the mfing and transfering as a scapegoat
As for me, I think four can work. The game will be tailored for it, and there will probably be a much smoother and more fitting increase in diffculty between the number of players this time around, instead of simply multiplying health and damage as in D2.
PlugY for Diablo II allows you to reset skills and stats, transfer items between characters in singleplayer, obtain all ladder runewords and do all Uberquests while offline. It is the only way to do all of the above. Please use it.
Supporting big shoulderpads and flashy armor since 2004.
:confused: huh? how is less better. so by that logic one person per game would be superior to all. so just cut the multiplayer aspect out of the game, sounds great...
Not so bright, are you? You completely butchered what I meant by that. 4 is the perfect number. I always thought it to be that way, and not too overcrowded. Apparently, Blizzard are retards who don't know what they're doing, and you, dear sir, should fill in the shoes of "Lead Designer" since you apparently know better.
4 is my opinion, don't ride my hump for it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Just gotta evade the Geeks =p
" And So our Tale ends, Bruenor BattleHammer.. In battle, as it should" -Drizzt Do'Urden -Ice Wind Dale-
but what if you want 'huge' (if you can call 8 people huge) 8 people trading games like in d2? ugh o well actually now that i think about it 4 isnt too bad, as d1 was heaps fun.
Done......
To find the truth, you must risk everything.
8 People or more per game please.... Please, Please, Please.
There should be at least 5 (one fo each class) and come on like they wont release a d3 expansion with at least 2 more class's in the future.
I wont feel fulfilled until I game with every class at the same time at least once.
4 Per game would be taking a step backwards in my opinion, but I will leave it to Blizz as it is their choice.
you do me a great service again good sir, my respect to you
i meant the wtf blizzard scapegoat one to be wanting more than 8, sorry i did not make that clear
As for me, I think four can work. The game will be tailored for it, and there will probably be a much smoother and more fitting increase in diffculty between the number of players this time around, instead of simply multiplying health and damage as in D2.
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
How would less be better?
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
:confused: huh? how is less better. so by that logic one person per game would be superior to all. so just cut the multiplayer aspect out of the game, sounds great...
4 is my opinion, don't ride my hump for it.
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions