Let me explain, i was reading the Wizard's profile page and in the story they were using a female type to tell the story, which would make the female wizard the canon character for this class. So my question is, will male and female characters in D3 have a canon story each or are we gonna have to know which type of class ( male or female ) is the canon one ?
Wrong. They confirmed that the storyline will take gender into consideration.
which could mean simply changing the pronoun in monologues directed at your character
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
they'll never see me coming.. life is a sequence of tragedies, inconsistent only by fleeting, elusive moments of pleasure,
serving only to ensure absolute vulnerability to the pain of their inevitable absence.
dimebog thanks for your reply
was there an interview where he said that? or were you present when he responded?
just remember this before:
Quote from From a Leipzig interview »
Question: The Barbarian is indeed the exact same as the one in D2, only 20 years later. So what impact will it have on the story when I select a femaleBarbarian instead?
Wilson: I'm not sure if we've decided what we're going to do in regards to that. In general, we want to make sure that each class has their own unique background and history, and should also note that these stories won't differ between male and female versions. The Barbarians will of course have a few little things that need to be changed, but in large part, the genders are similar. We'll probably only change small textual things about the femaleBarbarian. The Witch Doctor will be treated as an outsider, being from foreign lands, but the Barbarian is very intimidating because of his size and strength. We want him to have a stronger feeling as a roleplaying game character by making him have a unique impact on the world and not be so generalized.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
they'll never see me coming.. life is a sequence of tragedies, inconsistent only by fleeting, elusive moments of pleasure,
serving only to ensure absolute vulnerability to the pain of their inevitable absence.
Yes, and (hopefully) we'll see atleast some character/gender specific (side/random) quests and responses from the NPC's.
But i see that as being apart from the main storyline (like it was in D I and II) where the hero itself is actually completely irrelevant, the only thing relevant is that there is a hero, who it is or what their backstory is is of no consequence whatsoever. (i like this duality, it makes it seem as if no matter what, the story is inevitable, planned, faith)
I agree with what you said about the story/end already planned, but can't the end be the same while the way you get to it change by being a male/female character ?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
They'll be forced to do that anyways with the barbarian.
Why just the barbarian and not the others ?
which could mean simply changing the pronoun in monologues directed at your character
they'll never see me coming..
life is a sequence of tragedies, inconsistent only by fleeting, elusive moments of pleasure,
serving only to ensure absolute vulnerability to the pain of their inevitable absence.
Well thx, i guess this ends this thread heh. I don't know about you but i was hoping gender would be taken into consideration.
was there an interview where he said that? or were you present when he responded?
just remember this before:
they'll never see me coming..
life is a sequence of tragedies, inconsistent only by fleeting, elusive moments of pleasure,
serving only to ensure absolute vulnerability to the pain of their inevitable absence.
I agree with what you said about the story/end already planned, but can't the end be the same while the way you get to it change by being a male/female character ?