Well, I was bored and I looked up Blizzards release years of their games, focusing mainly on each franchise and see how they line up in terms of a pattern.
1994: Warcraft: Orcs and Humans
1995: Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness
1996: Warcraft II Explansion: Beyond the Dark Portal
1998: StarCraft Expansion: Brood War
2000: Diablo II
2001: Diablo II Expansion: Lord of Destruction
2002: Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos
2003: Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
2004: World of Warcraft 2006: World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade
2008: World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King 2009?: StarCraft II?
2009?: Diablo III?
Now as far as I see it, the pattern seems to be: Warcraft, Diablo, Starcraft, and finally Diablo again. Then it restarts with Warcraft. Now, this is a theory, but wouldn't it seem correct (according to this pattern) that a Diablo game would come next and a StarCraft game after that?
blizzard canned ghost because it sucked or something didnt they
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.