Lmfao?!?? Did u not read the posts about how a BOX can have interchangeable sides but NOT a rectangle? Like the WALL. Lmao wow dude you facepalmed yourself so epically with the box example when this was said at the beginning.
Lmfao?!?? Did u not read the posts about how a BOX can have interchangeable sides but NOT a rectangle? Like the WALL. Lmao wow dude you facepalmed yourself so epically with the box example when this was said at the beginning.
Winning still.
a wall... is not a rectangle, it is a rectangular prism. Fun fact: a CUBE(box lol) is also a rectangular prism
Lmfao?!?? Did u not read the posts about how a BOX can have interchangeable sides but NOT a rectangle? Like the WALL. Lmao wow dude you facepalmed yourself so epically with the box example when this was said at the beginning.
Winning still.
a wall... is not a rectangle, it is a rectangular prism. Fun fact: a CUBE(box lol) is also a rectangular prism
Wow. Box with equal sides somehow = rectangle without equal sides? With that logic how could I possibly argue? Most insane post so far.
Zombie wall shape does not = cube. All 3 sides are different. Unlike the cube. Holy moly you kids keep surprising me with the brainlessness
Lmfao?!?? Did u not read the posts about how a BOX can have interchangeable sides but NOT a rectangle? Like the WALL. Lmao wow dude you facepalmed yourself so epically with the box example when this was said at the beginning.
Winning still.
a wall... is not a rectangle, it is a rectangular prism. Fun fact: a CUBE(box lol) is also a rectangular prism
Wow. Box with equal sides somehow = rectangle without equal sides? With that logic how could I possibly argue? Most insane post so far.
Zombie wall shape does not = cube. All 3 sides are different. Unlike the cube. Holy moly you kids keep surprising me with the brainlessness
wait just one fucking second..... are you really not understanding that a square is technically a rectangle and that a cube is technically a rectangular prism? WOW dude, I...... ughghnmnggn someone please make him understand.......
I ignored that because it's irrelevant. Cube with equal sides does NOT equal the zombie wall shape. Anyone can clearly see that. And that makes his cube argument illogical to this considering the wall is not equal on all sides.
I ignored that because it's irrelevant. Cube with equal sides does NOT equal the zombie wall shape. Anyone can clearly see that. And that makes his cube argument illogical to this considering the wall is not equal on all sides.
Maybe the rubik's cube example is just to elegant for you, but the point he is trying to make is that the names your give the dimensions of the cube are related to your orientation to the cube and the same applies to other rectangular prisms. Maybe the best approach for you isn't to look at the structure as a wall but instead as several individual zombies. How long are zombies? Do zombies have a length? I would describe the distance from shoulder to shoulder of a zombie to be it's width. And if that distance could indeed be referred to as a width, would the combined width of 4-5 zombies be length? Or would the combined width of 4-5 zombies be width? These words ARE interchangeable, of coarse there are times when it would be silly to call that particular dimension of the wall the the width. For example I wouldn't call the Great Wall of China 88518km wide. But as the dimensions get smaller and smaller, your orientation to the object becomes more relevant and the distinction between the length and the width begins to blur.
There comes a point when you HAVE to realize that you are wrong! When almost everyone posting in this thread is against you.When you are claiming that everyone who is disproving you is "trolling". When you are acting like a douche (as you agreed to be doing). *sigh* Some people eh?
4-5 people on a random D3 forum disagreeing with me is hardly "everyone". considering during this argument i got RL opinions from about 14 other people. posted it on FB and 7 other people on there. and every single one agreed with me and said it was common sense. and none of them were 16 which is probably most of the people disagreeing. regardless of how old they say they are. so i know I'm right. i really dont care what random troll kids on a D3 forum say, lmao.
All I could think when I saw this post.
Also, how this guy has a wife and kids is astounding to me.
There comes a point when you HAVE to realize that you are wrong! When almost everyone posting in this thread is against you.When you are claiming that everyone who is disproving you is "trolling". When you are acting like a douche (as you agreed to be doing). *sigh* Some people eh?
4-5 people on a random D3 forum disagreeing with me is hardly "everyone". considering during this argument i got RL opinions from about 14 other people. posted it on FB and 7 other people on there. and every single one agreed with me and said it was common sense. and none of them were 16 which is probably most of the people disagreeing. regardless of how old they say they are. so i know I'm right. i really dont care what random troll kids on a D3 forum say, lmao.
All I could think when I saw this post.
Also, how this guy has a wife and kids is astounding to me.
There comes a point when you HAVE to realize that you are wrong! When almost everyone posting in this thread is against you.When you are claiming that everyone who is disproving you is "trolling". When you are acting like a douche (as you agreed to be doing). *sigh* Some people eh?
4-5 people on a random D3 forum disagreeing with me is hardly "everyone". considering during this argument i got RL opinions from about 14 other people. posted it on FB and 7 other people on there. and every single one agreed with me and said it was common sense. and none of them were 16 which is probably most of the people disagreeing. regardless of how old they say they are. so i know I'm right. i really dont care what random troll kids on a D3 forum say, lmao.
All I could think when I saw this post.
Also, how this guy has a wife and kids is astounding to me.
He has a wife and kids?
According to his sig he does, but then again he lives in make believe world so I really don't want to know what his definitions of wife and kids are.
no i don't have a wife and kids i left them? obviously. or did they leave me? i don't remember
from an architectural stand point of the length width and height of a wall in a structure. or height depth length are always the same. wither you are looking at architectural plans for building a wall or you are standing beside the wall, or in front of the wall. your view makes ZERO difference. your an architect and someone says increase the width, you increase the shortest side and double the depth of the wall, not the length.
if you want to say "the wall is a relative object and i can turn it any which way" then OF COURSE the sides can change, the zombie wall can't float off the ground and stand up on its side can it? no. architectural stand point is how I'm looking at this not arguing that "technically if you looked at it a way that it doesn't appear the sides change". sure you live in a world where walls float and flip on its side.
if you took that wall and layed it on its side, the sides would change. the depth would become the height. it would stop being a wall and become a platform.
if you flipped it sideways on its side, the depth would remain the same but length would become the height. it would still be a wall, just not how it was meant to be looked at.
so if the zombie wall never falls on its side and becomes a zombie platform. the depth will ALWAYS be the same. feel free to argue further in vein because i actually asked an architect to prove my point. because i needed to be sure i was right THAT badly. don't really care if you believe me, now I'm just all that much more confident. <3333
see you guys in 3 months when we find out I'm right. I've changed my mind to make a WD first now. just to get to act 2, find an indigo rune and post the results of what it does as soon as humanly possible.
So you are sticking with the assumption that the wall of zombies allows monsters to pass through?
most likely considering it would make the most sense. walking through would be better IMO, they slowly walk through the wall while being bombarded for a good amount of dmg.
well it being able to be attacked makes sense too. EITHER WAY my double width argument works for both of those. because why double the length if it can be beaten through? monsters would just nom nom through the first part they touch, "barricade" makes more sense for width as well.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Posts got moderated genius. Lmao
Lmfao?!?? Did u not read the posts about how a BOX can have interchangeable sides but NOT a rectangle? Like the WALL. Lmao wow dude you facepalmed yourself so epically with the box example when this was said at the beginning.
Winning still.
Wow. Box with equal sides somehow = rectangle without equal sides? With that logic how could I possibly argue? Most insane post so far.
Zombie wall shape does not = cube. All 3 sides are different. Unlike the cube. Holy moly you kids keep surprising me with the brainlessness
learning shapes
All I could think when I saw this post.
Also, how this guy has a wife and kids is astounding to me.
According to his sig he does, but then again he lives in make believe world so I really don't want to know what his definitions of wife and kids are.
from an architectural stand point of the length width and height of a wall in a structure. or height depth length are always the same. wither you are looking at architectural plans for building a wall or you are standing beside the wall, or in front of the wall. your view makes ZERO difference. your an architect and someone says increase the width, you increase the shortest side and double the depth of the wall, not the length.
if you want to say "the wall is a relative object and i can turn it any which way" then OF COURSE the sides can change, the zombie wall can't float off the ground and stand up on its side can it? no. architectural stand point is how I'm looking at this not arguing that "technically if you looked at it a way that it doesn't appear the sides change". sure you live in a world where walls float and flip on its side.
if you took that wall and layed it on its side, the sides would change. the depth would become the height. it would stop being a wall and become a platform.
if you flipped it sideways on its side, the depth would remain the same but length would become the height. it would still be a wall, just not how it was meant to be looked at.
so if the zombie wall never falls on its side and becomes a zombie platform. the depth will ALWAYS be the same. feel free to argue further in vein because i actually asked an architect to prove my point. because i needed to be sure i was right THAT badly. don't really care if you believe me, now I'm just all that much more confident. <3333
see you guys in 3 months when we find out I'm right. I've changed my mind to make a WD first now. just to get to act 2, find an indigo rune and post the results of what it does as soon as humanly possible.
most likely considering it would make the most sense. walking through would be better IMO, they slowly walk through the wall while being bombarded for a good amount of dmg.