Build Guide
Sup, I'm Uberjager#6563, you may remember me when I told you that you were gearing WW barb wrongly in vanilla D3 in 2013. Or when I changed the DH meta in early RoS 2014 from the 2H bows/xbows to the 4.15 breakpoint.
This guide has been revised after info from 2.4's PTR. Take note once Dfans update the build section with new legs replace the cubed strongarms with Aquila Cuirass. Endless walk set is crap (hopefully they revise it) so its still going to be FnR usage.
Bareknuckle#1182 has come up with his own variation of the build. Here's a link for his setup and show him some support by hopping over and liking his guide if you like his variant. (might have to manually copy paste the URL):
http://www.diablofans.com/builds/62323-istvans-paired-blades-hota-gr71-group
Here's his Bnet profile:
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Bareknuckle-1182/hero/66678240
_________________________________________________________________________
Just so I don't sound like some random player without any form of credentials, here are two of my previously published guides.
I wrote this in 2013:
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/7200300874?page=1
And this is 2014:
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/forum/topic/14277647739
_________________________________________________________________________
Istvan's paired blades are an extremely underutilized weapon mainly because they're difficult to obtain. You've to roll them with ideal stats as you're ideally going to reroll the IAS on little rogue and the socket on slanderer
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. THIS BUILD IS EXTREMELY HARD TO GEAR.
Can be run on non-seasonal but your pushing ability is hampered by the lack of stricken gem.
With no IAS on weapons and gear, max paragon, WoTB up and 0 PE stacks you will be at the 4.00 APS breakpoint on HoTA which will give you 2 stricken stacks every second. (this is WITHOUT snapshotting.)
The theorcrafting for why dual sword setups > 2 handed might weapon setups is due to 3 reasons:
1. Avg damage rolls on weapons and weapon IAS.
2. The value of CHD on HoTA which caps CC.
3. Breakpoint optimization on HoTA is a paradigm not entertained or thought about by present top tier players *cough* *scrubs*
4. You have stricken, snapshotting it along with your attack speed would allow you to overcome the differential of the loss of 50% Elite damage.
5. Once you're top heavy on strength most barbs start to add AVG damage to rings which benefit faster weapons than slower ones.
6. Istvan's buff now makes this build superior compared to gavel + cubed furnace in all instances.
I won't go in-depth into 1 and 2 but Nubtro has 3 perfectly nailed down:
_________________________________________________________________________
Quoted from Nubtro from the D3 barb forums:
7% Istvan swords
4.00000 HPS = no additional ASI needed = 2.519636 aps = 3.779454 aps incl. Men
-> baseline breakpoint for this setup as you already have 80% ASI
4.28571 HPS = 0.2% additional ASI needed = 2.699396 aps = 4.049094 aps incl. Men
-> 1 bleed @ PE
-> or Enchantress
-> or one additional slot (5-7%)
4.61538 HPS = 14% additional ASI needed = 2.90612 aps = 4.35918 aps incl. Men
-> two 7% slots
5.00000 HPS = 30.2% additional ASI needed = 3.148796 aps = 4.723194 aps incl. Men
-> two 7% slots with Gogok + Enchantress/third slot
-> or two 7% slots with 6 bleeds @ PE
-> or four 7% slots with Enchantress
5.45455 HPS = 59.4% additional ASI needed = 3.436412 aps = 5.154618 aps incl. Men
-> for example Slam Dance with 10 bleeds @ PE
6.00000 HPS = 72.2% additional ASI needed = 3.777956 aps = 5.666934 aps incl. Men
non-IAS Istvan swords
4.00000 HPS = no additional ASI needed = 2.52 aps = 3.78 aps incl. Men
-> baseline breakpoint for this Istvan setup as you already have 80% ASI
4.28571 HPS = 12.8% additional ASI needed = 2.6992 aps = 4.0488 aps incl. Men
-> two slots (6% + 7%)
4.61538 HPS = 27.6% additional ASI needed = 2.9064 aps = 4.3596 aps incl. Men
-> four 7% slots
-> ASI slots / PE / Gogok / Enchantress combo that gives 27.6% ASI
5.00000 HPS = 45.0% additonal ASI needed = 3.15 aps = 4.725 aps incl. Men
5.45455 HPS = 65.4% additonal ASI needed = 3.4356 aps = 5.1534 aps incl. Men
6.00000 HPS = 90% additonal ASI needed = 3.78 aps = 5.666934 aps incl. Men
From the looks of it, IAS Istvan swords will usually achieve one faster Hammer breakpoint given similar gearing for the cost of 2 primary stats. As always, PE bleeds are pouring a lot of RNG into our calcs/assumptions.
_________________________________________________________________________
This is my current setup.
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Uberjager-6563/hero/25307580
Non-seasonal Rank of 70 was achieved by a long time friend and countryman DAKKON#6113 using this build. He's currently at rank 2 on NS. Here's his profile (his gear might change)
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/DAKKON-6113/hero/8428604
Gearing for Istvans will be out of reach for most barbs. If you're unable to run the setup listed above it's probably more ideal that you stick to using the gavel.
I also didn't want to publish this build mainly because I think Istvan's sucks now (its set bonus is so ridiculously underwhelming given its rarity) it's only because of the way HoTA interacts with CHD/ IAS that make it better than Gavel. But I'm publishing this because I believe in free access to information for everyone to make better choices and also because I believe you have the right to make decisions for yourself with all information available.
I'm actually pushing for Istvan's to have the following set bonuses so PLEASE ASK FOR IT when they do PTR testing for 2.4:
(2)
Every time you spend a primary resource you gain 6% increased attack speed for 5 Seconds. This effect stacks up to 5 times.
(2)
Every time you generate a primary resource you gain 10% increased damage for 5 seconds. This effect stacks up to 5 times. (this damage bonus is multiplicative like FnR)
Istvan just got buffed:
Current set bonus:
(2) set: Every time you spend a primary resource, gain 6% attack speed, damage (multiplicative), and armor for 5 seconds. This effects stacks up to 5 times.
_________________________________________________________________________
Shoutouts:
Shoutout to mannercookie (even though we had our differences rofl) for running Istvan's as well and reaching to the same conclusion as I did about Istavan's HoTA (although you probably haven't optimized your setup yet) . GL to your IRL stuff. Diablo's a game gotta take a break some time and get things sorted out.
Shoutout to DAKKON who actually believed in the build and was willing to spend the time and effort to push for higher GRifts to show that the buld works.
Shoutout to anyone in OPOG: Men of Mayhem for all the bounty runs during the weekend event that gave me enough mats to roll my little rogue.
Shoutout to suddenzenith who I still talk to regularly and occasionally theorycraft with. Come back to the game whenever your life's in order. More theorycrafting and optimization awaits you. :3
Shoutout to the manliest of barbars Nubtro for your excellent analysis and breakpoint charts. Optimizing this build would have been impossible without you.
Lastly shoutout to Leland. http://www.d3barb.com/ is an invaluable resource, thanks and keep it up man.
_________________________________________________________________________
Cheers guys. Happy Barbing.
Questions/ Comments go below. I'm willing to debate with any of you scrubs.
I'm using a variation of this build as well, can u explain how u are at 4.0 APS without the buffs you reference. My APS gets to about 2.8 even running PE gem. Does the 50% attack speed buff from BOFM not show up on your character sheet?
The attack speed from BoFM is multiplicative and does not show up on character sheet.
Edit: Also 4.00 is HOTA APS, Nubtro refers to it as HPS or HoTAs Per Second, it is the result of hitting the 3.78 breakpoint for HoTA.
In layman terms, you get 4.00 HoTAs a second at 3.78 APS (after BoFM buff) which is 2.52 APS sheet APS with all buffs up.
Yeah, i'm still waiting on section 3-6 on that WW guide
Was my go to guide back in vanilla, good to see you back Über
Haha I skipped section 3-6 because it was all AH profit strategies which didn't stay static. The moment I posted a strategy it'd exhaust itself and I had to come up with another one so I just gave up.
Law of one price is pretty fucked up.
Double post. :/ Delete pls
On non seasons?
Both I and Dakkon have about... 1.3M HP?
Socket Esoteric instead of BoP and you've got enough EHP for high GRs.
Take note that Dakkon is an extremely skilled player.
He might have dropped vit for CC on that particular run. We usually run Str/vit/socket/HoTA damage for pushes. Perhaps he was comfortable being at 1.1.
So i did a little test on NS for a apple to apple comparison Uberjager .. And your claims don't seems to add up with reality (ingame:) ?
Take a look at this video where i compare "bis" 7%ias + 10% damage istvans with a 10% damage gavel. (all needed information is included in the video)
https://youtu.be/wrS7s8sdJGk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DW killtime vs T10 Ghom = start @ 01.05 -> done @ 2.14 = 1min and 9 sec = 69 sec
67154829312 / 69 = 973258395 edps
2-handed killtime vs T10 Ghom = start @ 04.20 -> done @ 05.05 = 45 sec
67154829312 / 45 = 1492329540 edps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried to limited my own edps while still hitting the 4.28571 HPS mark, for longest possible killtime and consistency.
Conclusion: DW Istavan's still sucks for non season.
If you think i did something wrong in the video, please let me know.
I thought Stricken stacking was solely based on sheet APS and ignored the extra APS from the bracers?? Unless something changed or that info was inaccurate..
I don't get the parameters of your test. Also try restricting your posts to one thread (i.e. barb forums) so I don't have to post twice on both sides.
Det0x stated the parameters for his test (on barb forums) were:
No Battlerage
No Ancients
No Restraint proc
No CoE
No Damage passives
No Follower
This is my critique on the test:
1. You're not going to drop CoE on istavan's because your increased sustain and mobility and vit off Istavans would mean that you won't ever drop CoE for Unity. Check DAKKON's loadout. He did a 69 without using unity.
2. Istavan's set lacks CC and HoTA damage because the set doesn't get extra fury nor does it get HoTA damage on weapon. You have 15% less HoTA damage on helm, no crit on your left ring and you're top heavy on strength which favors a Gavel setup. (you're a gavel barb at 1400 paragon)
3. Ancients does more damage on Istavans than Gavel because of the APS. Leaving it out skews results to gavel again.
4. You're fighting Ghom. Which benefits off elite damage. The basis of Istavan being better lies with trash clear, the reason why stricken is crucial for seasons is because increased stricken stacking helps to compensate for the lack of elite damage.
This guide and gear setup is not for someone who's just decided on a whim to start playing the build. You have to optimize it before it shows results and only with the top end gear of both Gavel and Istavans will you then see a difference. As mentioned in the guide, this build isn't for everyone. Also, link your gear.
Hi. I use a Gavel and can't think for myself. Thanks for making this great guide so I don't have to think for myself some more. Kappa
Cuz whether Istavans beats gavel or not is entirely subjective on the gear you have available. In short, have this gear setup as a goal you want to accomplish not something you need to achieve now. Run Gavel till you get better gear. (I ran gavel till I got my Istavans.)
IN YO FACE MANNERCOOKIE
Hey,
I have both the Slanderer and The little Rogue trying out the build now to see how it compares to the gavel. will let you know. also farmed myself a second gavel so I can use a non-ancient gavel to compare to my non ancient dual swords and see how fast they die. Will record it and upload it once I have time away from my daughter and let you guys see the differences and help us all see.
You can interchange that how you want to I have a 196 dmg first men but switched it out for my 29% strongarm. but those two are always interchangeable for what you have better.
5th passive from hellfire?
Superstition
Having tested this last night and clearing a GR71 in 2 player with it. The build works. The problem is the gavel build is more consistent DPS. The berserker rage passive is what is breaking this build. In the rift clear phase of a GR you will not be able to keep your fury maxed and keep the passive active. This puts your dps well behind the gavel since gavel is always going to be at max fury. IF you could keep the fury maxed in density, istaven would win. There isn't enough pet damage to compensate this loss, the gap is a good billion dps and the difference in pets without ber. rage is far too small. Once we get to the RG, I can go in with a capped APS snapshot and stricken flies, which is awesome, I killed Ghom faster on Istaven than I did Rime with gavel at gr71, but it's just not enough to compensate the sustained dps loss through the grift. I love the build, but it just doesn't seem to be consistent enough. We did test a lot of alternatives to make the build full functional and consistent(live on stream I might mention). We cubed cindercoat, t&t, and several other options, and while cindercoat helped us a TON in keep fury, the resulting full grift loss of strongarm debuff just wasnt worth the extra bits of uptime on berserker rage. Maybe I missed something, but build vs. build(at least in group) gavel build is going to win out.